Another year, another Worms game. After Worms Forts, which quite a few people didn't like, the
Worms are back in a more traditional setting, though sadly not
2D.
Worms 4 seems to be along the same lines as Worms Armageddon, with some mission based gameplay. Why does everything
have to have missions these days? Looking at the game, my initial thought is it looks a lot like
Hogs of War, which I played about four years ago on the PS1.
The game is due this Spring.
Reader Comments (2)
Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:47PM (Unverified) said
What's wrong with 3D? I've played many different Worms games over the years and have found Worms 3D (which I've played on GameCube and Mac OS) to be at least as fun, if not more fun that the original Worms 2D games.
Reply
Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:47PM (Unverified) said
The problem with 3D is the game is originally a 2D game, so by being forced into 3D, it's very hard to capture the same atmosphere and gameplay.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Vita 'UMD Passport' won't be offered in US 221 comments
- Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning review: A tempting fate 153 comments
- David Jaffe leaves Eat Sleep Play, layoffs hit developer [Update] 107 comments
- Blizzard taking Valve to court over 'DOTA' trademark 96 comments
- Don't call it a remake: Final Fantasy X is a 'remaster,' to be clear 95 comments
