Engadget & Joystiq's live coverage of Sony's PlayStation 3 launch
Hey everyone, we're at Sony's press event in Culver City to cover their unveiling of the PlayStation 3 this afternoon. Things are just getting started, to stay tuned for our comprehensive live coverage on Engadget and Joystiq!
Update: the parking lot ordeal was harrowing — they almost didn't let us in! It was a mob scene out there. Some journos were so desparate to get in that they went through all sorts of contortions for the gatekeepers. Check this lady out. That's a pushup with one foot above her head.
Ouch.
The presentation started with a little game history. "PlayStation 2 defined digital entertainment.... PlayStation
Portable, the next revolution!" The chest thumping was accompanied by thumping speakers.
First up: Kaz Hirai. "Are you guys excited about E3?" The audience barely cheered, so he had to try again. C'mon, show us the goods, then we'll be excited... maybe.
He does the numbers: 190 million units of hardware, 2 billion units of software. He does the backwards compatibility thing. These are the Sony strengths, so he reminds the audience that these are the goods that Microsoft can't match. No surprises here, but a specific response to the Xbox team, who weren't so sure last week whether they'll be able to make the Xbox 360 play Xbox games. [Update: Xbox 360 will be backwards compatible.]
Queue pointless interlude of flashy CGI graphics (not sure what that was for).
Ken Kutaragi introduced, and he proceeds to give the audience another lesson on the history of the PlayStation consoles. From "Real-time 3D-CG" to "Emotion Engine." He confirms backwards compatibility of the PlayStation 3, eliciting the first audience applause since he took the stage.
Cut to a video of an IBM dude woodenly reading from a teleprompter (his eyes dart quickly left-to-right) about the cell processor system. "Even though at times it seemed like an impossible journey, the entire team overcame impossible challenges to meet the goals.... We are very excited to look forward to see all the entertainment this chip will help create." All that's missing from this mess of trite mumbo-jumbo the word "synergy."
Highly technical performance overview given, including the following slides:
Sony's let go of the final specs and shots of the PlayStation 3. Here you go!
- It will support Blu-ray (obviously), DVD±R/W, CD-R/RW
- Backwards compatible with the PlayStation 2 and original Playstation
- One 3.2GHz Cell processor—total system performance rated at 2.18 teraflops (uh, that's actually about twice what Microsoft is claiming the Xbox 360 will do); it will have 256MB system RAM 3.2GHz, and 256MB GDDR VRAM at 700MHz
- The nVidia graphics will be called the RSX ("Reality Synthesizer"), and will trump the Xbox 360 with 1080p (yes, that's a p) graphics support.
- There will be a 2.5-inch hard drive (i.e. laptop hard drive) attachment—a first for a Sony launch (no, we don't
count the PSX and/or the FF add-on)
- Memory Stick Duo slot, and very surprisingly, an SD and CF slots
- Bluetooth support with up to seven wireless controllers
- Six USB system ports
The Technology Demos
So the specs are beginning to wear on the audience and people around us are shifting in their seats. Show us the graphics already!
Sony is only too happy to oblige. In one of the earliest demos they show a gas station blowing up, repeatedly. Lots of bits and pieces flying through the air to prove that the processer can handle the detritus of an explosion with ease. Another demo showcased a flyover of luscious and detailed landscapes that had been generated through procedural software routines only. That's like fractals, right? Well, it looked good.
This was followed by a demo showcasing the PS3's new LOD technology, or "Lots of Ducks" as the executive showcasing the technology referred to it. It was a reference to the little rubber duckling that was shown during the PS2 "Emotion Engine" demo. Hey — it's been 6 years since the PS2 launched and still nobody can explain to us what the hell the "Emotion Engine" is, other than great marketing.
So back to the LOD technology. The old PS2 demo was shown and morphed into the PS3 rendering of the same scene. Ok... better graphics, same damned duck. Then they popped in a couple of pirate battleships, each with impressively animated sails getting shot through with cannonballs.
So what's better than a bathtub with one rubber ducky and a couple of toy ships? Well, there's probably as much plastic in an E3 booth babe as in one of those ducks, but unfortunately Sony filled the tub with about a thousand more ducks. They all bobbed happily on top of each other, each individually rendered and beautifully colliding.
Sony also demoed a new and improved EyeToy interacting with the water in the bathtub. Holding a cup in each hand, the demonstrator dipped them into the water and filled them up, and poured them out. He filled one cup and poured it into the other. This was very cool and one of the wow moments of the presentation. Ripples of excitement bounced through the audience. Sony clearly wants everyone to know that the PS3 makes bath time lots of fun.
(Photo: this is one of those "architecture" slides. Does it actually tell us anything? Someone sic Tufte on the Sony people, quick.)
Games, games, games.
The game demos were divided into two groups: established franchises and new stuff. The demos of established franchises were arguably the more impressive and more polished of the two batches.
New: Motor Storm (Sony). This demo included about 60 seconds of truly chaotic game footage. It's a racing game, but a wonderfully muddy, violent and georgeously rendered-one from the looks of this footage, which definitely jazzed the audience. On reaction alone this was a crowd favorite. In the footage, motor vehicles of all types (dirtbikes, ATVs, dune buggies, rally cars) crashed into each other as they raced through muddy gulches and over high embankments. Motorcycles rode over the tops of slower vehicles and sometimes got crushed by larger vehicles. The violence was crunching and visceral and the entire experience immersive as a result of the realistic way in which mud, people, and parts of vehicles flew absolutely everywhere. Screenshot shows a motorcycle rider about to get creamed by an exploding rally car that's flying through the air at him.


Established title: Killzone (Sony) This game about interplanetary strife appears to be Sony's answer to Halo. All of the elements are here: explosions, guns, high-tech vehicles that drop marines into hostile territory at great risk of bodily harm, blah blah. The demo footage looked extraordinary, and maybe this time developer Guerilla will nail Sony's answer to Halo. One of the reviewers of Killzone for the PS2 said:
The potential for Guerrilla to develop a truly impressive FPS title on the PS2 is obviously there, but it's a learning curve that players won't be scaling anytime soon. The PS2's answer to "Halo"? Don't make us laugh.
Here's to hoping that the game lives up to the impressive footage we saw during the PS3 unveiling.





Get a WordPress.com Blog





Reader Comments (Page 1 of 13)
Biggie @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
Please tell me thats not the console....
I.B @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
Biggie, thats just a speculative picture.
Stinky McJones @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
Wow That is butt ugly. I don't really like the Xbox360, but comparatively it looks awesome.
Jmoney2786 @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
Ima laugh now if it is, HAHAHAHAHA
Perry @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
Why? What is wrong with it? Looks better than the 360 - at least this one matches other A/V components. Does not look like a toy either.
It looks like the PSX replacement version.
dukmahsik @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
that console is ugly
ps3prophet @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
The pic is not real...it's old. Blu-ray disks are no longer inside cartridges like that.
SetupWeasel @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
I don't think Sony should be reminding anyone of the PSX.
steve o 3000 @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
that thing looks horrible. not sleek, not sexy. I'd go as far to say that it looks worse than the current xbox. i pray to god that is not it.
limpfalife @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
#4
I totally agree with you
marlo @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
Why does the console's appearance matter so much anyway? Shouldn't the relevant factor for criticism be the quality of the gaming expereince it provides?
Kenton @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
Anybody know when the unveiling might be? I'm on a bit of a schedule but I don't want to miss this. Going to my friends to play Halo 2 but he doesn't have net access. Blegh. But I wanna see the ps3.
Bob @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
doesnt matter, thats not the official design
Corrupt Mind @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
It looks like a old dvd player/ugly generic sliver box. How un video game-ish. The XBOX 360 looks WAY cooler.
jaba @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
Guys, that picture has been a ps3 concept for like 2 years.
look:
http://images.google.com/images?q=ps3%20concept&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&sa=N&tab=wi
Nine @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
hope the games will not be so bad that i have to watch the console rather that the games ;)
Mike Thorpe @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
Guys, that pic has already been proved as false. Calm down! :-)
It's a slightly altered version of the first design of blu-ray player, i think.
Morten @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
#8 - It matters because it's all we have at this time. ;o)
DakkaUT @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
#8
For hardcore gamers, sure. But the average person isn't going to get it if it doesn't look good, since they'll be looking at it more than they play it. Sure it's dumb, but it happens.
David K @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
#8: Yes, but:
1. Since it is going to be part of your living room, you might as well as have a machine decent enough to show to your guests.
2. Imagine you decided to play LAN multiplayer with several - and I don't mean one or two - of your friends. So some people will have to carry the console. The console better be light or at least sleek as well, no?
Scott @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
"Why does the console's appearance matter so much anyway? Shouldn't the relevant factor for criticism be the quality of the gaming expereince it provides?"
Because the console's appearance is what makes the first impression for the majority of consumers.
~J~ @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
Crikey! I daren't say I like the design for fear of getting lynched!!
Anyway, I like to design, I think it's a nice sleek design and fits in with the rest of Sonys other home entertainment systems. Plus the xbox360 will look lovely placed on top of it!!!
Scott @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
"Why does the console's appearance matter so much anyway? Shouldn't the relevant factor for criticism be the quality of the gaming expereince it provides?"
Because the console's appearance is what makes the first impression for the majority of consumers.
Kenton @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
Does anyone know if we can probably be expecting to see the real ps3 within the next hour or so? Engadget is making it sound like this is basically all going down right now.
HentaiDesi @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
I hope that is not the console..it looks jarring and ugly..seems like Xb0x 360 has a winner if this is the console for change3 (PS3)
Jason McCabe Calacanis @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
Oh boy.... i guess we are doing the whole Steve Jobs keynote thing again. 100,000 people trying to get breaking news from Engadget and www.joystiq.com -- not good.
niC @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
Hey guys i think that the PS3 is not that bad looking. If you were to look at it in person it would look good plus it fits into todays entertainment system styles.
Post #3. Perry
I can't believe you said it looks better then the xbox360. It sure doesn't look better... i don't think it's ugly once you look at it in person but i'll disagree that it looks better then the xbox360. The Xbox360 looks cool but i guess people would have to see it live to judge better.
One more note guys... did you forget that Electronics are often products of concept art. There was a leak of a few xbox360 cocept art and they were real concept art. Just that in the end they were not choosen. I think that this is possibly legit!!! As far as a 160gb, blue ray included in the PS3 and the cell processor, expect this to be real expensive around the 700 dollar area if they are to make a profit.
Reality Bandit @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
It... is.. NOT.. the.. PS3. Calm down kids.. soon we shall see greatness, mwhahaha
sketcharoo @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
come on engadget, more info!!
pi3rc3 @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
it seems like they wont be showing pics...guess they didnt allow cameras in teh press confrence
Pharaoh @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
Hey how about we stop talking about the picture and start talking about how laggy this is because everyone wants to see the updates?
john @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
^
Exactly. Takes forever to reload, and it was like this on Friday with X-Box on MTV.
dzer0 @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
HOLY SH*T! Servers are getting HAMMERED!! I Can barely refresh and Joystiq is down!!!
peter @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
i like it. PS3 is one of those things that doesn't look extremely sexy in pictures, but will definitely kick ass when its sitting in front of you.
xbox630 looks great in pictures, but im not sure if i would want something looking like that in my home entertainment center.
try to imagine what the thing would look like in person, not in photos. theres a big difference. (especially if the photo is just at one angle, such as this)
the PS2 didn't look all that great, but after i got it i grew to really like the design. sony hasn't failed in the looks dept.
Daanish @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
Gamespot has some info:
http://www.gamespot.com/news/2005/05/16/news_6124681.html
HentaiDesi @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
According to gamespot..PS3 will have HDMI outputs, CompactFlash and memory stick slots, 2.2 Tflops of performance..basically kicks x360 out of the playing field w.r.t perf. Hope the design doesn't suck
Sonic_Extreme @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
its official specs..
http://www.gamespot.com/news/2005/05/16/news_6124681.html
what do you guys think?
wtf!! @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
I don't know what you are talking about HentaiDesi, gamespot hasn't given us any more information than we have known for months:
1. Bluray
2. Mid-2006
3. Official name is Playstation 3
There was no mention of any of the details you just said. Me smells a rabid fanboy. Take your pills now you don't want to go off the deep end.
sketcharoo @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
e3insider.com being updated? new pics u reck'? AMAZING specs from sony, beats the ass of any xbox fanboy!
PS3RULEZ @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
THIS PS3 CONSOLE IS AWESOME BUT EVEN IF ITS NOT THE RIGHT ONE THE REAL ONE WILL BE AWESOME TOO XBOX AND NINTENDO SUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!
snipa22 @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
if u could read ud see taht what he said is in the article.. fanboy...
andrew wilson @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
2 teraflops off of 3.2 ghz? not happening guys...
Pharaoh @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
Very tasty specs. I'm looking forward to finding out the price... :[
glitched @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
no look again, gamespot does have that info
Mark Jones @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
More PS3 launch info here:
http://www.firstadopter.com/fa/archives/000988.html
ExtremeIced @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
"Sony also laid out the technical specs of the device. The PlayStation 3 will feature the much-vaunted Cell processor, which will run at 3.2 Ghz, giving the whole system 2.18 teraflops of overall performance. It will sport 256mb XDR main RAM at 3.2 Ghz, and have 256MB of GDDR VRAM at 700mhz.
Sony also unveiled the PS3's graphics chip, the RSX "Reality Synthesizer based on Nvidia technology. The GPU will be capable of 128bit pixel precision, 1080p resolution, some of the highest HD resolution around. It also has over 300 million transistors, larger than any processor available commercially today. It was manufactured using the 90nm process with 8 layers of metal. The RSX is more powerful than two GeForce 6800 ultras, which would cost rough $1000 if bought today."
This an update from gamespot.
Erik J @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
The PlayStation 3 will feature the much-vaunted Cell processor, which will run at 3.2 Ghz, giving the whole system 2.18 teraflops of overall performance. It will sport 256mb XDR main RAM at 3.2 Ghz, and have 256MB of GDDR VRAM at 700mhz.
Sony also unveiled the PS3's graphics chip, the RSX "Reality Synthesizer based on Nvidia technology. The GPU will be capable of 128bit pixel precision, 1080p resolution, some of the highest HD resolution around. It also has over 300 million transistors, larger than any processor available commercially today. It was manufactured using the 90nm process with 8 layers of metal. The RSX is more powerful than two GeForce 6800 ultras, which would cost rough $1000 if bought today.
Sound expensive
Matt @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
I think Gamespot is full of crap. Anyway, who really cares how powerful the system is, that says nothing about the quality of the games. How bout some new gameplay possibilities, isn't anyone sick of the same rehashed games offered by current systems and input controls? I R.
Joey Geraci @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
You guys gotta keep in mind that even if the performance comparisons that Sony is citing here are accurate, only a very small percentage of games actually use a significant amount of that power in actual games.
And I by no means assume that these are accurate. Remember what Sony said about how the Playstation 2's Emotion Engine was going to revolutionize gaming, and how it would be able to render Toy Story. Sony execs have a habit of exaggeration and, dare I say it, bald-faced lies (they certainly aren't alone in that affliction)
Steve @ Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM
"Sony Computer Entertainment head Ken Kutaragi introduced it as a "Super computer for computer entertainment."
If I wanted a computer, I would buy a computer. I want a video game console.