| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (627)

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Please tell me thats not the console....

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Biggie, thats just a speculative picture.

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow That is butt ugly. I don't really like the Xbox360, but comparatively it looks awesome.

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ima laugh now if it is, HAHAHAHAHA

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why? What is wrong with it? Looks better than the 360 - at least this one matches other A/V components. Does not look like a toy either.

It looks like the PSX replacement version.

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
that console is ugly

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The pic is not real...it's old. Blu-ray disks are no longer inside cartridges like that.

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't think Sony should be reminding anyone of the PSX.

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
that thing looks horrible. not sleek, not sexy. I'd go as far to say that it looks worse than the current xbox. i pray to god that is not it.

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
#4

I totally agree with you

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why does the console's appearance matter so much anyway? Shouldn't the relevant factor for criticism be the quality of the gaming expereince it provides?

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Anybody know when the unveiling might be? I'm on a bit of a schedule but I don't want to miss this. Going to my friends to play Halo 2 but he doesn't have net access. Blegh. But I wanna see the ps3.

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
doesnt matter, thats not the official design

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It looks like a old dvd player/ugly generic sliver box. How un video game-ish. The XBOX 360 looks WAY cooler.

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Guys, that picture has been a ps3 concept for like 2 years.

look:
http://images.google.com/images?q=ps3%20concept&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&sa=N&tab=wi

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
hope the games will not be so bad that i have to watch the console rather that the games ;)

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Guys, that pic has already been proved as false. Calm down! :-)

It's a slightly altered version of the first design of blu-ray player, i think.

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
#8 - It matters because it's all we have at this time. ;o)

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
#8
For hardcore gamers, sure. But the average person isn't going to get it if it doesn't look good, since they'll be looking at it more than they play it. Sure it's dumb, but it happens.

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
#8: Yes, but:
1. Since it is going to be part of your living room, you might as well as have a machine decent enough to show to your guests.
2. Imagine you decided to play LAN multiplayer with several - and I don't mean one or two - of your friends. So some people will have to carry the console. The console better be light or at least sleek as well, no?

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Why does the console's appearance matter so much anyway? Shouldn't the relevant factor for criticism be the quality of the gaming expereince it provides?"

Because the console's appearance is what makes the first impression for the majority of consumers.

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Crikey! I daren't say I like the design for fear of getting lynched!!

Anyway, I like to design, I think it's a nice sleek design and fits in with the rest of Sonys other home entertainment systems. Plus the xbox360 will look lovely placed on top of it!!!

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Why does the console's appearance matter so much anyway? Shouldn't the relevant factor for criticism be the quality of the gaming expereince it provides?"

Because the console's appearance is what makes the first impression for the majority of consumers.

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Does anyone know if we can probably be expecting to see the real ps3 within the next hour or so? Engadget is making it sound like this is basically all going down right now.

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I hope that is not the console..it looks jarring and ugly..seems like Xb0x 360 has a winner if this is the console for change3 (PS3)

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh boy.... i guess we are doing the whole Steve Jobs keynote thing again. 100,000 people trying to get breaking news from Engadget and www.joystiq.com -- not good.

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hey guys i think that the PS3 is not that bad looking. If you were to look at it in person it would look good plus it fits into todays entertainment system styles.

Post #3. Perry

I can't believe you said it looks better then the xbox360. It sure doesn't look better... i don't think it's ugly once you look at it in person but i'll disagree that it looks better then the xbox360. The Xbox360 looks cool but i guess people would have to see it live to judge better.


One more note guys... did you forget that Electronics are often products of concept art. There was a leak of a few xbox360 cocept art and they were real concept art. Just that in the end they were not choosen. I think that this is possibly legit!!! As far as a 160gb, blue ray included in the PS3 and the cell processor, expect this to be real expensive around the 700 dollar area if they are to make a profit.

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It... is.. NOT.. the.. PS3. Calm down kids.. soon we shall see greatness, mwhahaha

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
come on engadget, more info!!

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
it seems like they wont be showing pics...guess they didnt allow cameras in teh press confrence

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hey how about we stop talking about the picture and start talking about how laggy this is because everyone wants to see the updates?

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
^
Exactly. Takes forever to reload, and it was like this on Friday with X-Box on MTV.

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
HOLY SH*T! Servers are getting HAMMERED!! I Can barely refresh and Joystiq is down!!!

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i like it. PS3 is one of those things that doesn't look extremely sexy in pictures, but will definitely kick ass when its sitting in front of you.

xbox630 looks great in pictures, but im not sure if i would want something looking like that in my home entertainment center.

try to imagine what the thing would look like in person, not in photos. theres a big difference. (especially if the photo is just at one angle, such as this)

the PS2 didn't look all that great, but after i got it i grew to really like the design. sony hasn't failed in the looks dept.

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Gamespot has some info:
http://www.gamespot.com/news/2005/05/16/news_6124681.html

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
According to gamespot..PS3 will have HDMI outputs, CompactFlash and memory stick slots, 2.2 Tflops of performance..basically kicks x360 out of the playing field w.r.t perf. Hope the design doesn't suck

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
its official specs..

http://www.gamespot.com/news/2005/05/16/news_6124681.html

what do you guys think?

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't know what you are talking about HentaiDesi, gamespot hasn't given us any more information than we have known for months:

1. Bluray
2. Mid-2006
3. Official name is Playstation 3

There was no mention of any of the details you just said. Me smells a rabid fanboy. Take your pills now you don't want to go off the deep end.

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
e3insider.com being updated? new pics u reck'? AMAZING specs from sony, beats the ass of any xbox fanboy!

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
THIS PS3 CONSOLE IS AWESOME BUT EVEN IF ITS NOT THE RIGHT ONE THE REAL ONE WILL BE AWESOME TOO XBOX AND NINTENDO SUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
if u could read ud see taht what he said is in the article.. fanboy...

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
2 teraflops off of 3.2 ghz? not happening guys...

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Very tasty specs. I'm looking forward to finding out the price... :[

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
no look again, gamespot does have that info

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
More PS3 launch info here:

http://www.firstadopter.com/fa/archives/000988.html

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Sony also laid out the technical specs of the device. The PlayStation 3 will feature the much-vaunted Cell processor, which will run at 3.2 Ghz, giving the whole system 2.18 teraflops of overall performance. It will sport 256mb XDR main RAM at 3.2 Ghz, and have 256MB of GDDR VRAM at 700mhz.

Sony also unveiled the PS3's graphics chip, the RSX "Reality Synthesizer based on Nvidia technology. The GPU will be capable of 128bit pixel precision, 1080p resolution, some of the highest HD resolution around. It also has over 300 million transistors, larger than any processor available commercially today. It was manufactured using the 90nm process with 8 layers of metal. The RSX is more powerful than two GeForce 6800 ultras, which would cost rough $1000 if bought today."

This an update from gamespot.

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The PlayStation 3 will feature the much-vaunted Cell processor, which will run at 3.2 Ghz, giving the whole system 2.18 teraflops of overall performance. It will sport 256mb XDR main RAM at 3.2 Ghz, and have 256MB of GDDR VRAM at 700mhz.

Sony also unveiled the PS3's graphics chip, the RSX "Reality Synthesizer based on Nvidia technology. The GPU will be capable of 128bit pixel precision, 1080p resolution, some of the highest HD resolution around. It also has over 300 million transistors, larger than any processor available commercially today. It was manufactured using the 90nm process with 8 layers of metal. The RSX is more powerful than two GeForce 6800 ultras, which would cost rough $1000 if bought today.

Sound expensive

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think Gamespot is full of crap. Anyway, who really cares how powerful the system is, that says nothing about the quality of the games. How bout some new gameplay possibilities, isn't anyone sick of the same rehashed games offered by current systems and input controls? I R.

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You guys gotta keep in mind that even if the performance comparisons that Sony is citing here are accurate, only a very small percentage of games actually use a significant amount of that power in actual games.

And I by no means assume that these are accurate. Remember what Sony said about how the Playstation 2's Emotion Engine was going to revolutionize gaming, and how it would be able to render Toy Story. Sony execs have a habit of exaggeration and, dare I say it, bald-faced lies (they certainly aren't alone in that affliction)

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Sony Computer Entertainment head Ken Kutaragi introduced it as a "Super computer for computer entertainment."

If I wanted a computer, I would buy a computer. I want a video game console.

Featured Stories

Image

Silver Lining: I Am Alive's unfeeling world

Posted on May 25th 2012 7:30PM

Image

Game Of Thrones and the paradoxes of adaptation

Posted on May 25th 2012 5:00PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW