| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (8)

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yes! Rare=teh pwnage
Although, they have been in a slump lately with making good games. All the N64 games they made were the best. Hmm, I wonder, maybe a sequal to their game on the 64? Doubt it but a jet force gemini sequal would pwn. =)
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
In its coverage of this news, gamespot say this move was considered highly unlikely if not lunacy. Well can anybody else not see this: Its more of an attempt to bring more and more attention on DS rather than PSP (which already is not doing well). Sony is already not benefiting a good lot from PSP and MS just wants to tackle Sony on all ends. Using the legendary name of Rare and given its success with nintendo platform, not only MS will make lots of money on the software but also give a deep blow to Sony. This is entirely possible simply because MS probably does not consider the Revolution an as direct competitor as the PS3, so if supporting nintendo can mean damage to Sony, then game on for MS. Good move.
I just hope Mr.Kutragi stops with the useless word battle and once again drop another bombshell to make some of this more exciting.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I didn't know Rare made Banjo Kazooie / Tooie... Sweet!!! And #2, - "again drop another bombshell to make some of this more exciting" - I have a good feeling that the Sony will make a humongous impact on gaming history. So don't worry lol.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Rare is a non-factor. Their projects over the past 4 years are as follows:

Star Fox Adventures - A ho-hum Zelda clone with the Star Fox characters. Not very good.

Grabbed by the Ghoulies - A sucktastic waste of time.

Conker: Live and Reloaded - Port of an old game.

Otherwise, what have they done of note? Rare isn't anything special. They've only done a handfull of decent games (Killer Instinct, Conker) with the rest being nothing to get excited over.

The Rare factor: Whoever has Rare on their side has to factor in them being a money sink.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ok #4.. So what about Goldeneye, Banjo Kazooe/Tootie, Perfect Dark.. They also made the Donkey Kong games; imagine what this could do for this hand-held system. If perfect-Dark came out on the DS it would be a top seller, same with Goldeneye, Conker, Banjo and Donkey Kong.

Rare are working on some long term projects such as Kameo and Perfect Dark Zero, sure Grabbed by the Ghoulies isn't exactly a good game but it's not aimed at people your age, it's aimed at children.

I won't say you are a complete retard because that’s just nasty, lets just say your intellectually challenged.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Banjo-Kazooie/Tooie were not that good. They were at best over-hyped scavenger hunts.

So, since 1997, we have the following titles that are undisputedly good:

Goldeneye
Perfect Dark
Conker

That is 3 titles in 8 years. Add two DK games, Battletoads and Killer Instinct to spread that to 7 games in 14 years.

Rare has been involved with around 60 different titles, and only 7 of them can be classified as good. That is a terrible track record if you ask anyone.

Rare has made absolute crap like Taboo: The Sixth Sense and Time Lord, and you've got what is best known as a totally underwhelming company.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Furthermore, Donkey Kong Country was a child's game, so there is no excuse for Grabbed by the Ghoulies to be bad.

Even furthermore, Kameo has been in development for a long time and has jumped platforms three times. Previous games that tried this and succeeded: 0. Here is a list of titles that have done the multiple platform jump before release:

Duke Nukem Forever - Vaporware
Daikatana - Destroyed John Romero's career.

The future for Kameo isn't looking good as jumping platforms like that tends to screw up the programming.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Okay, LaughingTarget, obviously your not exactly the biggest fan of Rare, to say the least. But that doesn't mean that Rare hasn't had a succesful past. I remember Donkey Kong 64 was one of my favourite games of all time, and the crack about banjo kazooie? Just take a look at IGN's rating, or anywhere else for that matter....it was a well received game, but whether or not it sold well I don't claim to know.

My point is this: you can say that YOU think Rare is junk, but don't go trying to convice otherpeople, who love the old stuff Rare has done, that Rare is worthless.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW