| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (6)

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I seriously doubt that this will be good for the consumer. While the Nintendo/Atari argument is a good story, it just doesn't play out that way anywhere else. Would we say that the Windows XP "platform" is being drowned under a sea of low-quality software? Okay, maybe we would, but it doesn't make PCs less appealing or prevent good software from coming out. In fact, it's the software that keeps people coming back to Windows rather than switching to Mac.

Monopolistic control almost always leads to less competition, lower quality, and reduced innovation. That's true of games and it's true of peripherals as well. A Microsoft tax on peripherals will hurt the console in the long run.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
n8 - i don't know about that. here's what i do know... 18. that's the number of mad catz controllers my friends and i went through in two months after the first xmas the xbox was out. we played halo once a week and every week someone was going through a controller, same problem... right trigger. mind you we used it a lot, but 18 of them? luckily for me i was smart enough not to buy the 3rd party peripherals to begin with, and my "duke" controller still works just fine (especially as a paper weight) but i know i could plug it back in and play nearly 4 years later.

in all fairness, mad catz repaired all the controllers. we sent them all back in one big box after we couldn't contact anyone about their "guarantee", but it was still a quality factor that will hopefully be dealt with through this agreement.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I feel your pain, but I seriously doubt that Microsoft is really getting into the business of testing peripherals. In other words, it'll be more focused on compatibility than quality.

On the flip side though, MS will be able to reject any peripheral that they don't like - those that have "too many buttons" or include cheat features, integrate functions of devices that only MS wants to sell, etc.

Example: what if madcatz wants to make a controller with an integrated keyboard, microphone and headphone jack, but Microsoft doesn't want devices with too many functions integrated because it reduces the number of times they collect their new peripheral tax? They deny the certification, and consumers now have to buy three devices - the controller and the headset, and the keyboard.

Example 2: Microsoft decides that because many of the games for the x360 are going to be online, it doesn't want any controllers that include programmable buttons or autofire buttons that would give one player an advantage over another. Cert denied.

That's just a few ways that MS can shoot themselves or the consumer in the foot with this plan. I'm sure there are others.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
All this will lead to is higher price accessories, and more unlicensed homebrew ones.

The Nintendo/Atari story is of no relevance, because it applies to SOFTWARE not HARDWARE. Requiring SOFTWARE titles to be licensed is one thing. It gives control over game content to the console manufacturer. Wether this is good or bad depends on how tight a grip they maintain over the process. It worked for the NES. And there are still a lot of homebrew UNLICENSED games around.

Hardware licensing will prevent people from using the XBOX any way that MS doesn't want them too.

That being said, the XBOX 360 will probably kick ass, just like the XBOX. But I'll probably won't buy one for the same reason I don't own an XBOX: Microsoft.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
>"In fact, it's the software that keeps people coming back to Windows rather than switching to Mac."<

Uh, HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! *snicker* "Its the software..." *snicker*


Thank God the companies (okay, M$ only at this present time) are starting to do this again so we don't get craptacular products from craptacular companies anymore...
At least I hope this will happen..
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Uh, what's so funny, Tia? I said software, not OS. There are few people I know who wouldn't prefer to use Mac OS, but they feel like they can't because they won't have access to the software they like - whether that's games, shareware, or defacto industry standards that are only available on Windows.

If you've got a different view, don't just snicker, 'splain!
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW