| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (8)

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think the author is right that there are large costs associated with running a *good* MMOGs, and having the proper numbers of quality staff is vital for a games success. Because of that, I don't think lowered hardware costs will change the viability of running most games.

I'd also comment that it seems like no one so far has put together a quality game and figured out how to keep it "new" for players over a period of years. Simply opening a new area is not enough to keep the interest of veteran players who have already burned out on the game. Until someone comes up with the right model, I think all MMOGS that run in persistent worlds will have this fate hanging over them.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Um, yeah, MMOs get shut down, but unles they're total failures (AC2), they don't get shut down until they've after they've been producing income for years longer than most games. Ultima Online is approaching the decade mark, and continues to generate what, $15-20 million a year in revenue or more? Is there a console game out there that was released in 1997 and that's still selling the equivalent of 150,000 copies a month at $10-15 each? I have no idea, but I doubt it.

I don't really see what's short about the MMO tail here. MMOs that die are the exception rather than the rule. Which other shut-down games are you talking about that need to be revived?
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Mike: the long tail is a phenomenon measured in terms of decades. An MMO does throw off cash for longer than a traditional game, but if you compare it to a TV series like "Friends" you'll see that it's still making this money during its primary launch window. There is no aftermarket for MMOs.

1997 to 2005: no big deal.
1997 to 2050: not gonna happen for MMOGs in the way that it is currently happening for Atari console games.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, I'd submit that we don't have the data for the 2005-2050 period yet, so it's impossible to say. MMOs are very sticky places. Given the kinds of strong relationships that form there, I wouldn't be surprised if some worlds go on generating cash for decades. There are text-based MUDs that have been around for 25 years (though most of these are free). Graphical MMOs in general aren't even ten years old yet (Meridian 59 was released in 1996), and are just starting to become places that are tied more strongly to their residents' real lives. Television has been around for half a century. I wonder whether there are any shows from the first decade of television that are still generating revenue. (I wouldn't be surprised either way, but I wouldn't know what they are off the top of my head either.)

Let's just say I'm more optimistic.

--Mark
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually - I think the solution to this may come from, of all places, the MMO hacker community. For some games there's a pretty healthy Private Server community. I think the MMO gamemakers (especially the ones with games that near an end-of-supported-life situation) may do well to embrace this idea of releasing their server software to the public for their waning titles. And hey, they may even still be able to make a buck off of their client software for a while longer.

Worked for the FPS's, ya know?
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
But 'the pile of bodies' in the diagram only occurs very rarely, hardly enough to be considered. Are there that many of them playing Madden 1999 or even Simcity classic? It's just a very small minor bleep for most games.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Mike: the long tail is a phenomenon measured in terms of decades."

No, the long tail is simply what portion of the sales (or whatever you're measuring) fall under your amplitude threshold. The subscriber base for something like Puzzle Pirates falls below any reasonable popularity threshold, so any money derived from it would contribute to long tail.

Long tail is often used to refer to two different things: one, the sale of items below a certain threshold; two, the sale of a product after its initial high sales period. With conventional media, it's often okay to conflate the two meanings, but they're distinct.

The latter meaning-- money generated from a product after its initial high sales period-- seems artificial. It would mean that Puzzle Pirates could be considered long tail now if it used to be twice as popular, but if it's been steadily popular, it can't be. That data, though, has nothing to do with affordable server load and support.

The fact is, there is a point where an MMO can be profitable, but still dwarfed by blockbusters. This point is lower for a company that runs multiple MMOs, and can exploit economies of scale (SOE). Planetside is another that I'd consider long tail at this point.

Of course, in the current environment, short tail dwarfs long tail. That doesn't mean long tail doesn't exist, simply that it's small.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
In the event an MMO is shut down, the maker should release the server binaries, if not the server source code, to the private server community. Of course I could see why they may not want to release the code.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW