| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (50)

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
great picture, really captures her...um...those things ...um...oh nevermind.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If you can't set up a website that isn't compatible with Firefox, your website isn't worth my time. Figures MTV would pull some bullshit like that.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
#1 ... I believe the term you're looking for is "lovely lady lumps"
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Touching is good" Where's my stylus?
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
BOOOOOOBIES!!!!!!!!!!!!

HAHAHAHA I was in that crowd. TO bad it is crappy resolution video. I am sure the original was alot better. I'd like to pic my self out of that shot in the beginig.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
#1, #4

bewbies? they're not too bad but i've always been a leg and ass man.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Can some of you big boobie people wear some 360 logo shirts so the pictures will flood the news stations and the system will sell well?, thanks bye.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
hehe, sorry to have sabotaged my fellow writers comments with sexual innuendo - yes, yes, boobies, lovely lady lumps, melons, bosoms, hooters, atom smashers, bazongas, bouncing bettys, flesh fujis, hammocks for two, major league mammaries, omigods, pillows, pom poms, rotunda grandes, snow cones, ta ta's, tits, wonkas, yazoos, zoombas....

ok, i have now successfully made a situation worse than i thought possible.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You forgot Sweater meat and it isn't your fault that MTV zoomed in on this young girls chest. ANd by the way she is probably only 16 LOL!!!!! I think they were trying to point out the Miyamoto Is GOd on her shirt but UH, you know there is probably a 80% male video game population and well you did post some BREASTISIS Yes I said it BREASTISIS!
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
#1 - Those are rediculously huge (I'm sorry but I REALLY had to say that)

#2 - Miyamoto is GOD
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
#8 Personally I prefer the term funbags.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Those breasts aren't that huge. That's fairly average around here. See bigger quite often here.

Anyways, really sucks the coverage gaming gets on MTV... Scares me.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
she really mammorialized that moment forever.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Good thing the Nintendo Revolution controller can be used with one hand judging by all these comments! lmfao!
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Those breasts aren't that huge. That's fairly average around here. See bigger quite often here

----

That was the Mayor of Flab City. Thanks for chiming in with the update.

Back to you, Ken.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I want one of those Tshirts for my missurs' !
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Miyamoto is God.
Clapton is God.
Does that mean that Shigeru Miyamoto is Eric Clapton?
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
any more pics of the girl?
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"That was the Mayor of Flab City. Thanks for chiming in with the update.

Back to you, Ken."


huh?
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Congrats Dan and Ross... way to go alienating half the population, objectifying the female body, and promoting such sexism.

I can understand your wanting to have fun, this is a gaming site afterall, but you really need to stop promoting sexism. I am not saying that you have to cover the social/economic impact of videogames in developing nations, but stop the blatent sexist crap. please...
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I actually didn't crop any of the image from that picture, jc; if you watch the video, that's really the best view MTV gave of what was on the shirt. Looking back in hindsight, however, I guess I should've chosen another image (based purely on the majority of the responses we've got here). Sorry about that. My bad.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
After reading these comments, is it any wonder the rest of the world thinks that gamers are immature, sexist, isolated and lonely pigs?
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Poor Luigi. Not even his own creator acknowledges his existence.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That shot actually shows the logo in question. Any other shot were the logo isn't that readable would have been a moot point. You can't stop up from acting like immature 13 yr olds, and you can't stop jc from being over senseative (oops mispelled). Most of the comments were funny. I don't think that everyone in the world reads your blog and probably most of them are male. Sorry jc, but we actually do see women in a sexual way even when we lie and say we don't. oh, by the way it's not actually sexism. He would have had to deny her or somehow mistreat her based on her gender. Maybe if he took out her picture and they edited her out of the MTV show because she was female and some men might make sexual comments. That would be sexism.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You know, that's someone's daughter. Lighten up.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What happens when you have a thread about a woman's t-shirt in a video game blog?

BOOBIES!!1! OMGLOLZZZZZ T3h r0xx0rzzzzz!!1!one!
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
kuroshi, if you can't see that as being sexism... you have bigger problems than just not being able to spell.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No, Yuji Naka is a god.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
#20, #22,

God, you're a bunch of sad fucks. Being attracted or turned on a woman's body is not sexism.

Oh wait, lemme guess -- if a guy checks out a woman long enough, its visual rape, right?
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Being attracted by a woman's body is *natural*.

Making disparaging comments is *sexism*.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
While not very indepth, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexism does offer a very basic understanding. I suggest some books, and actual conversations with strong women who know what the issues are.

Sexism is a difficult issue to understand, and once you do start 'getting it' you realize that by not standing out against it, you are infact promoting it.

I was 'required' to learn about it for one of my jobs, but now that I have a basic understanding I feel I can treat people with more respect. If you honestly love women, or want to in the future... you owe it to everyone (including yourself) to learn at least a basic understanding. What do you have to lose?

Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What a bunch of whiny little snots we have here! Get a dictionary, djSyndrome:

Sexism:
1. Discrimination based on gender, especially discrimination against women.
2. Attitudes, conditions, or behaviors that promote stereotyping of social roles based on gender.

Saying "nice rack" is not sexism. Giving her a free DS instead of the pudgy guy next to her because she has a nice rack IS sexism.

But I'm sure she's ecstatic that she has a bunch of nerdy little white knights to save her from lecherous Internet dwellers. Keep up the good fight guys, you're not only saving her innocence, you're also making the world a better place by deriding people for saying they like a set of breasts.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
#32,

Well said.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Chris, what if that was a logo on a close up of a man wearing underwear... or a logo on an ethnic head piece... or (insert sex/race/religion)

One of the issues is that you are insecure, and to overcome that loss (feeling powerless)... you overcompensate by putting others down.

I can't stop you Chris from treating people with a lack of respect, but I will be damed if I stand by and not do anything. I am not here to 'save innocence', I am speaking out because I have women friends/family/partner that I love and respect. I enjoy nice breasts/body parts on women, but I also see them as a whole being... not somthing to objectify.

Chris, do you not see that onjectifying women is sexism?
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Gee Chris, must be great living in a world of absolutes. The color gray is a wonderful thing, and comes in many shades. You should check it out sometime.

When I said 'disparaging comments', it can be easily inferred that a comment leaves a lot to interpretation and the context it is used in. Depending on the target audience, your example of 'Nice Rack' can be taken as a compliment, harassment, or something in between.

For example, if I commented on my wife's 'rack', well, in our relationship I can do that sort of thing, and she'll be more than okay with it.

But if the guy behind the counter at the corner store does it, she's going to flatten him into the floor posthaste.

To disprove your example, it can be argued that making a comment about someone's rack *can* promote a social example that women are little more than objects. Which fits pretty nicely with your second definition of 'sexism'.

A dictionary isn't the end-all and be-all of the English language. But thanks for playing!
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Whoa.

Ummm..

I <3 Nintendo

That was pretty funny 1337Thespian
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How about instead of high-browing down guys who remark on a woman's anatomy (whether or not it's done directly to the woman's face and meant lasciviously or humorously doesn't seem to matter to some people, mind you), we invest in educating women on how to make remarks about a guy's anatomy?

Anybody?

*sigh* oh well then, while a few of you continue Taking Things Too Seriously in your quest to become Popes of the Holy Moaning Empire, I'll slip this in:

Miyamoto, Murakami, Miyazaki - three four-syllable Japanese names beginning with 'M' that have altered my little universe forever. Almost as much as boobies did.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
JC, are you asking if I would talk differently if it were a man? Yes, I wouldn't say the same things. But my fiance might say "nice ass" if it were a good looking guy.

As for feeling insecure, well, she obviously doesn't feel insecure, wearing a tight T-shirt with a logo on the chest. And someone's insecurities really aren't my concern anyway.

While I can't say I don't stare at attractive women (I live in a college town; they're everywhere), I do it discreetly and passively. I don't whistle at women or say things to them like you might expect. I'm not going to avert my eyes from a low-cut shirt, but I'm not going to stare at a waitresses' chest while she asks for my order, either.

I don't see commenting on a woman's appearance as objectification. It's an observation. I wouldn't feel objectified if a woman complimented me on my looks.

Now, a strip club or porn can certainly be objectifying, but objectification is done by the guy looking regardless of the medium. The same guy who goes to a strip club to "look at all the tits" is going to look at the college girls walking down the street the same way, while someone like you or I might just look and think "hey, she's got a nice rack", and move on.

And DJ, there is no gray area in the misuse of terminology. I'm no more sexist for commenting on a woman's body than I am racist for calling Michael Jordan the greatest basketball player ever. Don't just throw pejorative terms around.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Chris, the point I was trying to make is that there can be a gray area in the application of adjectives like 'sexist'. It's all up to the interpretation. You spend three paragraphs espousing your flexible standards when it comes to how you view women, yet you state that the term 'sexism' is a yes or no question? That hardly seems realistic.

And before you think otherwise, it would be unfair of you assume that just because I look to personally define sexism in slightly feminist terms that I also do not enjoy looking at women in a sexual way ;)
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"I don't see commenting on a woman's appearance as objectification. It's an observation."

Chris, the difference between observation and objectification is usually what comes out of your mouth.

Do you see the difference between: 'that girl has nice breasts' and 'yes, yes, boobies, lovely lady lumps, melons, bosoms, hooters, atom smashers, bazongas, bouncing bettys, flesh fujis, hammocks for two, major league mammaries, omigods, pillows, pom poms, rotunda grandes, snow cones, ta ta's, tits, wonkas, yazoos, zoombas....' ???

To me the later is infantile and derogitory... whilst the first is not.

"What a bunch of whiny little snots we have here!" Dude, repsect starts at home. I am guessing taht you can't respect what I am saying... or anyone else for that matter. Enjoy your life...
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hey, come on guys, there's room in the gaming world for gay gamers too.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"After reading these comments, is it any wonder the rest of the world thinks that gamers are immature, sexist, isolated and lonely pigs?"

This would happen in any other hobbyist blog/forum. I mean, how many car mags(commonly thought of as a "man's hobby") are dedicated solely to staring at boobs. Same thing with musicians, same thing anything. Guy sees breasts, guys drools and makes catcalls. Guys are and will always be thought of as immature sexist isolated and lonely pigs, regardless of their profession or hobby. The funny part about that is that the role of hunter and prey have switched with the younger generation, as most guys I know are pegged down for sex by the girls ages 18-23.

I don't quite get why you folks are so serious about it. This is a gaming forum. Through the anonymity of the internet, everyone has backbone and refuses to back down/change their views on subjects. You might as well be preaching to a brick wall.

That or just deal with the fact that man sees boobs, man drool. Unless the woman is being harassed("boy i'd love to leave a pearl necklace around that rack!" when she could read it)... There's really no harm aside from people trying to defend people who don't even care to be defended. Some people just like to take offensive to everything.

Besides, I'm sure the girl would be flattered as long as she stayed anonymouse. Humans like to be appreciated for their body, that's a well documented fact.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How about you geeks stop arguing over womens breasts until you've actually become familiar with them in every conceivable manner of which a boyfriend is with his girlfriends body, sorry, i just had to say it, i mean, it figures the only people in the world who'd have a huge debate over a regular rack behind a normal, fairly witty t-shirt, are guys (and maybe gals O_o) who've never got to see them beyond porno.

Take it from someone who knows, yes their soft and warm and nice to hug up to and they make sex all the more fun, but, their not the kinda thing that requires a massive debate over, when the original article concerns women gamers admiring a game developer god.

Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reddy, I think your comments prove beyond any doubt that you might just fall into the exact category of people you describe.

There should really be an age and/or intelligence limit on who can post comments.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Uh. You guys are perverts, I actually know this girl and she just IMed me all freaked out about you guys talkin about her boobs.

Sheesh.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reddy... if you are so against pointless arguments over a girls breasts then why the hell did you comment? why did you make a post to make yourself feel good like you told off all the people commenting when you know its just going to cause more comments, so you can eventually get into another argument? jesus christ kid. think about what you do. i mean come on... boobs, woot! nothing wrong with that. this is the way the world is, there is nothing you can do to change it. just drop it and think what you will of the people. no matter what anyone posts there is someone who wants to argue with it. my own post not excluded, i'm sure there will be someone who wants to "out-wit" me or try to say i'm stupid, but the difference is Reddy, i don't care. they are entitled to think what they want. it's the order of the world. just flow with it man.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i was actually beside this girl when the video was taken, and I knew just from the angle and the way he zoomed out that this was going to happen.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
When this picture was taken of me, I didn't realize it would start all of this. Imagine how disturbed I am to read some of these comments. I guess it's my own fault for allowing the shot to be taken in the first place, although I didn't think it would show up anywhere like this. No harm done, I suppose. It's just a little bit creepy.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, maybe you should've signed for a waiver or something, or at least insist on a face-to-face interview. That way, people might view you more as a legit Nintendo fangirl than, say, that pair of sweater muffins you got up there.
Reply

Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
We waited in line over six hours and did *not* get to meet Miyamoto. Maybe next time...

Anyway, I posted a bunch of photos and video clips on my web site. Have a look:

http://www.robdicaterino.com/miyamoto.html

There are even photos of the sidewalk everyone signed while waiting in line.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW