In the most recent survey sent out to members of Sony's Gamer Advisory Panel (sorry, it's invite-only), Sony asked
gamers a few questions about what's important to them in online games.
The three questions involve not only how to improve your online gaming experience, but also how important certain
online features are to "your overall console online gaming experience"—such as a web browser, a hard drive, and voice
chat—as well as how you arrange online games with friends. Non-GAPers can check out
these
scans of the one-page survey.
We don't know whether this pertains to online services for the PS2 or PSP as well, but the answers would most
certainly be relevant for development of the PS3 and its supporting services. Maybe we'll even hear something about
them next month!
[Thanks, Dmitri]
Sony online gaming survey for the PS3?
67
Reader Comments (67)
Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:37PM (Unverified) said
Crazy american, I won't even point the irony of the fact that you call me a retard. You make me laugh all the time, thanks.
Anyway, the point about mentioning Hi Def is that Microsoft has no business in bragging about Hi Def when it barely supports 720p and it doesn’t have a next generation media drive, Period. At least Nintendo isn't as hypocritical and says: "You don't even need it."
And also, get your numbers right putz, the Xbox has sold by now little more than 22 million worldwide, and gamecube is getting close to the 20 million mark worldwide, twilight princess could as well push a lot of cubes, I never said 5 million, lol.
The cube could as well end up tied with Xbox, just think: 360 will sink Xbox sales in a month, because no must own game will come out on Xbox after 360 comes out, which is no surprise regarding the fact that MSFT said that they want the transition to 360 to be immediate, that's why the backwards compatibility is so feeble.
Tim says: "any idiot can go on a P2P/Torrent service and download a huge 25 gig ROM pack of every nintendo game ever made. "
Yeah, anyone that gives enough of a shit to play games in their PC that they didn't play because they weren't even born yet, or that is too much of a loser to either not afford AN OLD CONSOLE, or worse, not find anyone to borrow from that still has a SNES with a lot of games. I still have my old consoles (except PS1 which is useless when you have a PS2) with games, and if I ever feel like it, I just have to connect it, and if I don't have a game, I borrow it from anyone I know, or at least get it from ebay. Or buy it again, just check all the remakes that are coming out.
I agree with you in the fact that you are not a well informed person, Nintendo already said that these games will be updated graphically, and with some revolution features (like online play for example). That is what you are paying for. You can get none of these things "for free", let alone that getting them "for free" isn't even legal you putz. Of course, you don't give a shit, but just because of people like you, gamers have to pay a prime included in every game to protect companies from piracy. I hope you and everyone that does that get busted, so we gamers can get the price we deserve. Oh well, it's just a matter of time.
And also you say:
"If Revolution has free online, it will be because it's worth that. Nothing."
Thanks for your "intelligent review" Tim, I’ll be sure to consider it when it comes out.
Anyway, the point about mentioning Hi Def is that Microsoft has no business in bragging about Hi Def when it barely supports 720p and it doesn’t have a next generation media drive, Period. At least Nintendo isn't as hypocritical and says: "You don't even need it."
And also, get your numbers right putz, the Xbox has sold by now little more than 22 million worldwide, and gamecube is getting close to the 20 million mark worldwide, twilight princess could as well push a lot of cubes, I never said 5 million, lol.
The cube could as well end up tied with Xbox, just think: 360 will sink Xbox sales in a month, because no must own game will come out on Xbox after 360 comes out, which is no surprise regarding the fact that MSFT said that they want the transition to 360 to be immediate, that's why the backwards compatibility is so feeble.
Tim says: "any idiot can go on a P2P/Torrent service and download a huge 25 gig ROM pack of every nintendo game ever made. "
Yeah, anyone that gives enough of a shit to play games in their PC that they didn't play because they weren't even born yet, or that is too much of a loser to either not afford AN OLD CONSOLE, or worse, not find anyone to borrow from that still has a SNES with a lot of games. I still have my old consoles (except PS1 which is useless when you have a PS2) with games, and if I ever feel like it, I just have to connect it, and if I don't have a game, I borrow it from anyone I know, or at least get it from ebay. Or buy it again, just check all the remakes that are coming out.
I agree with you in the fact that you are not a well informed person, Nintendo already said that these games will be updated graphically, and with some revolution features (like online play for example). That is what you are paying for. You can get none of these things "for free", let alone that getting them "for free" isn't even legal you putz. Of course, you don't give a shit, but just because of people like you, gamers have to pay a prime included in every game to protect companies from piracy. I hope you and everyone that does that get busted, so we gamers can get the price we deserve. Oh well, it's just a matter of time.
And also you say:
"If Revolution has free online, it will be because it's worth that. Nothing."
Thanks for your "intelligent review" Tim, I’ll be sure to consider it when it comes out.
Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:37PM (Unverified) said
b
we know you won't consider anything because your narrow minded. Its cool, we all know you are.
I make you laugh do I? have you seen my porno pics or what?
The 360 barely supports 720p? wow try 1080i. Way to try and b a reatard.
Revolution said you don't need it? when did MS said you NEED it? the correct answer is never. They have said its nice, but never have said it is a must.
Don't talk about Hard Drives either. As far as I know (correct me if im wrong) MS is the only one launching with a Hard Drive (premium). Sony doens't, Nintendo doesn't. So really its not a logical argument on your part that the 360 doesn't have a big enough one. Its big enough for most gamers. If you need more, buy a bigger one, just like your friend (he must be pretty smart eh?)
And how many times you gunna say putz? you got some self esteem issues? does it make you fell better to try and put other down? Thats cool.
Your a cool kid
we know you won't consider anything because your narrow minded. Its cool, we all know you are.
I make you laugh do I? have you seen my porno pics or what?
The 360 barely supports 720p? wow try 1080i. Way to try and b a reatard.
Revolution said you don't need it? when did MS said you NEED it? the correct answer is never. They have said its nice, but never have said it is a must.
Don't talk about Hard Drives either. As far as I know (correct me if im wrong) MS is the only one launching with a Hard Drive (premium). Sony doens't, Nintendo doesn't. So really its not a logical argument on your part that the 360 doesn't have a big enough one. Its big enough for most gamers. If you need more, buy a bigger one, just like your friend (he must be pretty smart eh?)
And how many times you gunna say putz? you got some self esteem issues? does it make you fell better to try and put other down? Thats cool.
Your a cool kid
Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:37PM (Unverified) said
"we know you won't consider anything because your narrow minded. Its cool, we all know you are."
Yeah, I'm narrow-minded, despite the fact that I already said that I will get all three consoles even when the 360 is my last choice because it's just a small improvement over 360. Wow, you are smart, man.
"And how many times you gunna say putz? you got some self esteem issues? does it make you fell better to try and put other down? Thats cool."
So I have "issues" because I say "putz", yet you don't when you call me a retard? I love it when people try to play the shrink role when they are just acting like preconceiving dipshits. Like that works for making a point on anything. Man, you are just hilarious.
Yeah, Xbox has 1080i resolution, so? PS3 has 1080p, so MSFT can stop bragging about that. And the fact that they don't say explicitly that you need Hi Definition, but that MSFT brags all the time about it, it's implicit that they wanted to make Xbox an important choice for Hi Definition users. Too bad PS3 is better at that. Too bad it can't play hi definition movies, so it's a mediocre choice for Hi Definition users.
And no, MSFT is not the only one launching with a Hard Drive. Nintendo has Flash Memory, which is more reliable than a hard drive that can fail. Besides, the 360 needs it for "backwards compatibility... sort of" and for game patches, that's why Nintendo can afford to just launch with 512 MB of storage. Also, the PS3 will launch with optional and much bigger hard drives.
Also, crazy American, you say "NINTENDO DONT SUPORT HD LOL" but recently they said that they are considering it, so stop passing bullshit as facts. You just have to read a little.
Yeah, I'm narrow-minded, despite the fact that I already said that I will get all three consoles even when the 360 is my last choice because it's just a small improvement over 360. Wow, you are smart, man.
"And how many times you gunna say putz? you got some self esteem issues? does it make you fell better to try and put other down? Thats cool."
So I have "issues" because I say "putz", yet you don't when you call me a retard? I love it when people try to play the shrink role when they are just acting like preconceiving dipshits. Like that works for making a point on anything. Man, you are just hilarious.
Yeah, Xbox has 1080i resolution, so? PS3 has 1080p, so MSFT can stop bragging about that. And the fact that they don't say explicitly that you need Hi Definition, but that MSFT brags all the time about it, it's implicit that they wanted to make Xbox an important choice for Hi Definition users. Too bad PS3 is better at that. Too bad it can't play hi definition movies, so it's a mediocre choice for Hi Definition users.
And no, MSFT is not the only one launching with a Hard Drive. Nintendo has Flash Memory, which is more reliable than a hard drive that can fail. Besides, the 360 needs it for "backwards compatibility... sort of" and for game patches, that's why Nintendo can afford to just launch with 512 MB of storage. Also, the PS3 will launch with optional and much bigger hard drives.
Also, crazy American, you say "NINTENDO DONT SUPORT HD LOL" but recently they said that they are considering it, so stop passing bullshit as facts. You just have to read a little.
Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:37PM (Unverified) said
"is my last choice because it's just a small improvement over 360"
I meant over Xbox, oops
I meant over Xbox, oops
Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:37PM (Unverified) said
I forgot to mention:
"So really its not a logical argument on your part that the 360 doesn't have a big enough one. Its big enough for most gamers. If you need more, buy a bigger one, just like your friend (he must be pretty smart eh?)"
Yeah, but then I'd be wasting the 20 GB HD. Also, Can I buy one universal 2TB hard drive that costs only thrice the piece of shit 20GB XBOX ONLY, or does it have to be an "Xbox only" hard drive? If it is an Xbox only hard drive, will I be able to install all my games, besides my music and some movies, or will it be a shitty hard drive with a shitty system that won't let me do that? Don't forget that MSFT said that their piece of shit system is "hack-proof". If I can't buy a cheaper and much better hard drive, then it's useless. I'll wait 'till that happens.
"So really its not a logical argument on your part that the 360 doesn't have a big enough one. Its big enough for most gamers. If you need more, buy a bigger one, just like your friend (he must be pretty smart eh?)"
Yeah, but then I'd be wasting the 20 GB HD. Also, Can I buy one universal 2TB hard drive that costs only thrice the piece of shit 20GB XBOX ONLY, or does it have to be an "Xbox only" hard drive? If it is an Xbox only hard drive, will I be able to install all my games, besides my music and some movies, or will it be a shitty hard drive with a shitty system that won't let me do that? Don't forget that MSFT said that their piece of shit system is "hack-proof". If I can't buy a cheaper and much better hard drive, then it's useless. I'll wait 'till that happens.
Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:37PM (Unverified) said
b
You rock my socks off
if the 360 is a piece of shit, don't buy it. People don't want you on it anyway.
512 Mb of flash memory oh man....simply amazing. thats like, half a Gb. Oh snap. By the way, its not a hard drive is it?
Also if you don't wanna spend money on a 20 gig hard drive, buy the core and upgrade.
Its a shitty system because it doesn't come with a big enough hard drive to put all you games on? who the fuck wants that. You stated earlier you want your stupid ass disks. There you go, you don't need a hard drive. oh wait but you want one to put all your games on. That seems a bit contradictory doesn't it?
I never called you a retard. Good thing you are beastly at reading though.
And you think the ps3 is all that cuz the ps2 was a piece of shit, correct? it seems like a huge jump, and it is, but only cuz the ps2 was severly underpowered. The xbox is a beast of a machine.
Yeah your one crazy mofo: in your previous post you said the 360 barely supports 720p, now it supports 1080i. Glad we got somewhere. Shows how narrow minded you really are.
OH the 360 doesn't have 1080p, which no tv has, and it doens't have two hdmi outputs. That is really important to a system.
I see now why you love the ps3. No hard drive, 1080p with not a single tv that will support it, and 2 outputs which no one will use.
And Nintendos 512 Mb flash memory justifies that purchase.
Nice talking to you
You rock my socks off
if the 360 is a piece of shit, don't buy it. People don't want you on it anyway.
512 Mb of flash memory oh man....simply amazing. thats like, half a Gb. Oh snap. By the way, its not a hard drive is it?
Also if you don't wanna spend money on a 20 gig hard drive, buy the core and upgrade.
Its a shitty system because it doesn't come with a big enough hard drive to put all you games on? who the fuck wants that. You stated earlier you want your stupid ass disks. There you go, you don't need a hard drive. oh wait but you want one to put all your games on. That seems a bit contradictory doesn't it?
I never called you a retard. Good thing you are beastly at reading though.
And you think the ps3 is all that cuz the ps2 was a piece of shit, correct? it seems like a huge jump, and it is, but only cuz the ps2 was severly underpowered. The xbox is a beast of a machine.
Yeah your one crazy mofo: in your previous post you said the 360 barely supports 720p, now it supports 1080i. Glad we got somewhere. Shows how narrow minded you really are.
OH the 360 doesn't have 1080p, which no tv has, and it doens't have two hdmi outputs. That is really important to a system.
I see now why you love the ps3. No hard drive, 1080p with not a single tv that will support it, and 2 outputs which no one will use.
And Nintendos 512 Mb flash memory justifies that purchase.
Nice talking to you
Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:37PM (Unverified) said
My ps1 stopped working during the metal gear rex fight of metal gear solid. My Ps2 hates GTA 3 and all Dvd roms, and no joke my old sony 20 inch crapped out on me a year ago. I think sony is on the right track. If you make a p.o.s console people will have to buy it again when the first one breaks. Microsoft and Nintendo take note!
Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:37PM (Unverified) said
I've never had a hard drive fail, in my decade using computers. Just thought I'd point out the rarity of your argument.
The Halo 2 map packs took up 250MB of space. A similar map pack with Hi-Definition textures, and possibly larger levels for more players, could easily take up more than 3 times as much space. Suddenly that 512MB of Flash Memory (that never fails! Whoopie!) doesn't seem so big. It couldn't even fit a Map Pack.
Each KOTOR save was roughly 10MB, if I recall, and being the type of player I am, I like to save to a different slot every couple hours. 20 saves, 200MB. Make it a little bigger, considering the extra complexity next-gen Bioware games will likely have.
I'm not saying Flash memory is bad, I'm just saying Hard Drives are better, and useful.
In response to the "anti-ROM" crap b was going on about -
Game companies aren't making money off of those any more, so I have no clue what you're talking about.
"Of course, you don't give a shit, but just because of people like you, gamers have to pay a prime included in every game to protect companies from piracy."
I don't like to be rude, but you were very rude to me. So - Are you completely retarded? Do you think Joe Blow on Ebay is going to sell me a SNES cart, walk down the street to his local "Nintendo Store" and give them their cut? Nintendo isn't making money off of me buying it off of Ebay, and they aren't making money off of me when I download it. They don't even make the games anymore, you moron.
The Halo 2 map packs took up 250MB of space. A similar map pack with Hi-Definition textures, and possibly larger levels for more players, could easily take up more than 3 times as much space. Suddenly that 512MB of Flash Memory (that never fails! Whoopie!) doesn't seem so big. It couldn't even fit a Map Pack.
Each KOTOR save was roughly 10MB, if I recall, and being the type of player I am, I like to save to a different slot every couple hours. 20 saves, 200MB. Make it a little bigger, considering the extra complexity next-gen Bioware games will likely have.
I'm not saying Flash memory is bad, I'm just saying Hard Drives are better, and useful.
In response to the "anti-ROM" crap b was going on about -
Game companies aren't making money off of those any more, so I have no clue what you're talking about.
"Of course, you don't give a shit, but just because of people like you, gamers have to pay a prime included in every game to protect companies from piracy."
I don't like to be rude, but you were very rude to me. So - Are you completely retarded? Do you think Joe Blow on Ebay is going to sell me a SNES cart, walk down the street to his local "Nintendo Store" and give them their cut? Nintendo isn't making money off of me buying it off of Ebay, and they aren't making money off of me when I download it. They don't even make the games anymore, you moron.
Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:37PM (Unverified) said
“They are not making the games anymore” Does that make it legal? It's called piracy Tim, didn't you know? Disregarding the fact that gamers have to pay primes for that, it is not legal. Do you care? No. Anyone does? Neither. Your point basically is: “A company should make the assumption that people act illegally against their right to make a profit of their intellectual property in order to not take any action to stop that and keep making profit”.
But maybe, just maybe you could make some sense, Nintendo will think "Oh, gamers can get games for free illegally, so we shouldn't improve upon our classics and sell them for a little prime to the ones that would actually like to". Perhaps you are right though, that's probably why iTunes never got released, because companies thought "they can get our songs free through Napster/Kazaa/Limewire, so why bother?", so maybe you have a point in that. (But just maybe)
In eBay you can find anything, didn't you see the past game auctions? Of course, they were expensive, but there are tons of very cheap auctions at eBay in which you could get games for a dollar. Yes, you have to pay for shipping, that's why you buy multiple games to disperse the cost. If another gamer lets you have his game for a little money, it is not piracy or is it? Is he violating copyrights? Nobody is making illegal copies, so no. He’s not making a profit either, since he is selling it for less than what it cost him (and nobody can make the assumption of the contrary when there is no proof). Hell, if EB and Gamestop do it and it’s legal when they are ripping us off, I don’t see why not buy them cheaper from someone to stop these EB and GS assholes. You’ll think it’s not practical to do it the legal way, but that’s what you do if you want to not brake the law, but “everyone does it”, that is why companies will start to offer things online, which is legal, and it makes up for gamers. "Everyone does it, so why shouldn't I?” That is a lame pretext.
And by the way, if Halo was complete and not rushed out, you wouldn't have needed the hard drive. That's something Nintendo doesn't like doing, that's why they delayed Zelda, and I'm glad. Nintendo will never need updates, and I'm sure 512MB are enough for just game saves and a few revolution games. Of course, you can always buy more flash memory as memory cards, and not have to get another freaking hard drive, which if 20GB is 100 dollars, I wonder how much will a 200GB will cost?
I said that I wouldn't download ROMs from Nintendo if they didn't have a single update as Iwata said they would. I don't remember being let down by Nintendo anyway. If they are indeed updated, and it's legal to do it, then I have no problem on downloading a few games that are 64 Megs in size, TOPS (A 64 game). Besides, I could get two flash memories for just games, and another two (tops) for game saves, which is too much anyway, considering I rarely fill up a memory card, like almost anyone (and that is a very extreme case; I think 512 MB will be more than enough; when I said I want a huge hard drive for PS3, I know it’s more than enough, but that’s because I want it as a commodity, so if the 360 HD is a “commodity”, I consider it mediocre, and if I get a 360 I have to get that, or the shitty core bundle).
And in that extreme case, it would be even cheaper than a 100 dollars hard drive, considering that at least it’s more secure than hard drives, and that the hard drive is necessary for games you already bought. But that only happens with Xbox.
In your case, probably hard drive failure is rare, but in my case, my last Toshiba Laptop (that I still use, but it is the last one I will use) had several disk failures. Some said due to “extreme use”. I had warranty for two of the three disk failures, but unfortunately I couldn’t back up all my info. Some said “it happens when the disk is old or over used”; but with flash memory that just won’t happen. Also, Toshiba is a piece of shit, I’m never getting one again, and neither should you. I’m not the only dissatisfied customer, I know several close friends that had problems with it, like a burned motherboard in the FIRST WEEK, and now his computer died, even when he bought it after I did LOL. I’m still having problem with shitty ATI Radeon, too bad nVidia doesn’t make video cards for laptops. I wonder if Microsoft having an alliance with ATI and Toshiba in different areas is just coincidental.
But anyway, it still happens, even if not as often, with all hard disks, sooner or later. That’s why I rather have flash memory, and discs as back up, instead of having to download a lot of content. I’ll say it again; I want the hard disk as a commodity to install all my discs, but not to heavily rely on it as with Xbox.
Sorry if I was repetitive, but i'm really tired.
But maybe, just maybe you could make some sense, Nintendo will think "Oh, gamers can get games for free illegally, so we shouldn't improve upon our classics and sell them for a little prime to the ones that would actually like to". Perhaps you are right though, that's probably why iTunes never got released, because companies thought "they can get our songs free through Napster/Kazaa/Limewire, so why bother?", so maybe you have a point in that. (But just maybe)
In eBay you can find anything, didn't you see the past game auctions? Of course, they were expensive, but there are tons of very cheap auctions at eBay in which you could get games for a dollar. Yes, you have to pay for shipping, that's why you buy multiple games to disperse the cost. If another gamer lets you have his game for a little money, it is not piracy or is it? Is he violating copyrights? Nobody is making illegal copies, so no. He’s not making a profit either, since he is selling it for less than what it cost him (and nobody can make the assumption of the contrary when there is no proof). Hell, if EB and Gamestop do it and it’s legal when they are ripping us off, I don’t see why not buy them cheaper from someone to stop these EB and GS assholes. You’ll think it’s not practical to do it the legal way, but that’s what you do if you want to not brake the law, but “everyone does it”, that is why companies will start to offer things online, which is legal, and it makes up for gamers. "Everyone does it, so why shouldn't I?” That is a lame pretext.
And by the way, if Halo was complete and not rushed out, you wouldn't have needed the hard drive. That's something Nintendo doesn't like doing, that's why they delayed Zelda, and I'm glad. Nintendo will never need updates, and I'm sure 512MB are enough for just game saves and a few revolution games. Of course, you can always buy more flash memory as memory cards, and not have to get another freaking hard drive, which if 20GB is 100 dollars, I wonder how much will a 200GB will cost?
I said that I wouldn't download ROMs from Nintendo if they didn't have a single update as Iwata said they would. I don't remember being let down by Nintendo anyway. If they are indeed updated, and it's legal to do it, then I have no problem on downloading a few games that are 64 Megs in size, TOPS (A 64 game). Besides, I could get two flash memories for just games, and another two (tops) for game saves, which is too much anyway, considering I rarely fill up a memory card, like almost anyone (and that is a very extreme case; I think 512 MB will be more than enough; when I said I want a huge hard drive for PS3, I know it’s more than enough, but that’s because I want it as a commodity, so if the 360 HD is a “commodity”, I consider it mediocre, and if I get a 360 I have to get that, or the shitty core bundle).
And in that extreme case, it would be even cheaper than a 100 dollars hard drive, considering that at least it’s more secure than hard drives, and that the hard drive is necessary for games you already bought. But that only happens with Xbox.
In your case, probably hard drive failure is rare, but in my case, my last Toshiba Laptop (that I still use, but it is the last one I will use) had several disk failures. Some said due to “extreme use”. I had warranty for two of the three disk failures, but unfortunately I couldn’t back up all my info. Some said “it happens when the disk is old or over used”; but with flash memory that just won’t happen. Also, Toshiba is a piece of shit, I’m never getting one again, and neither should you. I’m not the only dissatisfied customer, I know several close friends that had problems with it, like a burned motherboard in the FIRST WEEK, and now his computer died, even when he bought it after I did LOL. I’m still having problem with shitty ATI Radeon, too bad nVidia doesn’t make video cards for laptops. I wonder if Microsoft having an alliance with ATI and Toshiba in different areas is just coincidental.
But anyway, it still happens, even if not as often, with all hard disks, sooner or later. That’s why I rather have flash memory, and discs as back up, instead of having to download a lot of content. I’ll say it again; I want the hard disk as a commodity to install all my discs, but not to heavily rely on it as with Xbox.
Sorry if I was repetitive, but i'm really tired.
Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:37PM (Unverified) said
The Halo Map Pack was bonus content made after the game was complete. Something that Xbox Live account subscriptions no doubt paid for.
---
"Hell, if EB and Gamestop do it and it’s legal when they are ripping us off, I don’t see why not buy them cheaper from someone to stop these EB and GS assholes."
Or download it, to stop these EB and GS assholes.
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for being able to download old nintendo games. I'm saying it's no big deal. I don't know why anyone cares. It's not a feature so much as it is extra, unnecessary fluff. Just like Xbox Live Arcade. Just like (insert whatever stupid junk Sony ends up throwing in.)
I love Steam. I don't know if you play HL or any of it's mods, so maybe you don't use it. I think it's great and I love the ease of use. Buying video games online is awesome.
Sorry about your laptop.
I can't even remember what I'm arguing about, so I'll switch over to something you mentioned earlier.
The PS3 cannot and will not compete with a half decent Media Center PC. If you're looking for a media hub or whatever, Windows MCE is the way to go. Xbox 360 happens to work excellently with one. And on that PC, you can literally have terabytes (if you're made of money) of all the HD media you could possibly want. You can upgrade it for cheaper than you can upgrade your PS3 or Xbox, you can have access to BluRay AND HD-DVD, not to mention everything else you can imagine.
I'm not saying 360 is better for this reason. But MCE is the best for Media, no matter what. There's no reason to tout the PS3 as some Media Champion.
How they stack up to each other as game machines is all that matters. Backwards compatibility, Classic games, Live Arcade, none of that matters.
How can you congratulate Nintendo's frankness in stating that High Definition is unnecessary, and then criticise a lack of 1080p capabilities?
I'm tired too and this is too long.
Summary: PS3s media capabilities will never stack up to a good media center PC, and the best console will, as always, be determined by games, not the extra junk.
---
"Hell, if EB and Gamestop do it and it’s legal when they are ripping us off, I don’t see why not buy them cheaper from someone to stop these EB and GS assholes."
Or download it, to stop these EB and GS assholes.
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for being able to download old nintendo games. I'm saying it's no big deal. I don't know why anyone cares. It's not a feature so much as it is extra, unnecessary fluff. Just like Xbox Live Arcade. Just like (insert whatever stupid junk Sony ends up throwing in.)
I love Steam. I don't know if you play HL or any of it's mods, so maybe you don't use it. I think it's great and I love the ease of use. Buying video games online is awesome.
Sorry about your laptop.
I can't even remember what I'm arguing about, so I'll switch over to something you mentioned earlier.
The PS3 cannot and will not compete with a half decent Media Center PC. If you're looking for a media hub or whatever, Windows MCE is the way to go. Xbox 360 happens to work excellently with one. And on that PC, you can literally have terabytes (if you're made of money) of all the HD media you could possibly want. You can upgrade it for cheaper than you can upgrade your PS3 or Xbox, you can have access to BluRay AND HD-DVD, not to mention everything else you can imagine.
I'm not saying 360 is better for this reason. But MCE is the best for Media, no matter what. There's no reason to tout the PS3 as some Media Champion.
How they stack up to each other as game machines is all that matters. Backwards compatibility, Classic games, Live Arcade, none of that matters.
How can you congratulate Nintendo's frankness in stating that High Definition is unnecessary, and then criticise a lack of 1080p capabilities?
I'm tired too and this is too long.
Summary: PS3s media capabilities will never stack up to a good media center PC, and the best console will, as always, be determined by games, not the extra junk.
Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:37PM (Unverified) said
who cares about online games. If its online, it looses its story and sense of direction. Take halo2 for example I own it so I know what its about the single player mode is great so is the coop 2 player story but when you play online it doesnt have a story at all just mindless shooting not to put the game down but I think developers need to maintain the story in games or it will all go to hell.
Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:37PM (Unverified) said
Which brings me to the thing I forgot, now that it's morning.
Live is not a frivolous nothing-service like Arcade. I love playing online with my friends, and the more that games utilize this service (Apparently PGR3 is the pinnacle of it) the better the online is.
Re: Andrew's Story Argument
Racing Games.
Also, I'm extremely confident in saying that millions of people don't require a story in their (multiplayer) game. Years of counterstrike and "5-WAY MAZE DEFENSE!!!!@!" can attest to that.
Live is not a frivolous nothing-service like Arcade. I love playing online with my friends, and the more that games utilize this service (Apparently PGR3 is the pinnacle of it) the better the online is.
Re: Andrew's Story Argument
Racing Games.
Also, I'm extremely confident in saying that millions of people don't require a story in their (multiplayer) game. Years of counterstrike and "5-WAY MAZE DEFENSE!!!!@!" can attest to that.
Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:37PM (Unverified) said
b-
I read your entire post and i really have no idea what the hell you are rambling on about.
I honestly don't know how to respond to that. I'll excuse your for your tiredness because you're usually better in your arguments (no sarcasm).
But i do totally agree with Tim:
"How can you congratulate Nintendo's frankness in stating that High Definition is unnecessary, and then criticise a lack of 1080p capabilities(one the 360)?"
Andrew-
I don't really play games for their single player stuff. XBL is the deciding factor for me in a console. I play halo 2 online nonstop. I can honestly say i haven't ever gotton past the first half of the game.
I read your entire post and i really have no idea what the hell you are rambling on about.
I honestly don't know how to respond to that. I'll excuse your for your tiredness because you're usually better in your arguments (no sarcasm).
But i do totally agree with Tim:
"How can you congratulate Nintendo's frankness in stating that High Definition is unnecessary, and then criticise a lack of 1080p capabilities(one the 360)?"
Andrew-
I don't really play games for their single player stuff. XBL is the deciding factor for me in a console. I play halo 2 online nonstop. I can honestly say i haven't ever gotton past the first half of the game.
Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:37PM (Unverified) said
Tim
I criticize 360 and nor revolution for trying to be something like a PS3, which in fact is half way between Revo and PS3. I don't criticize revolution because they aren't as hypocritical, and because at least Nintendo is also doing a big leap in other areas, perhaps the most important: gameplay (and they also haven’t ruled out the possibility of HDTV capabilities anyway). And I just consider Sony to have a huge advantage with Blu-ray, at least for me. I seriously can’t wait to get 10 seasons of “The Simpsons” in one Disc, for example (Fox is going to publish in Blu-ray format anyway, so that could happen). I just see these two as the both the great extremes, I don’t want the “middle” where you are halfway between gameplay experiences and next generation media.
I also said that I'd love a 2TB disk on my console, but don't get me wrong, I never said I needed it. What I meant was that if I ever wanted a hard drive, it would better be a big one. So If I buy an ultimate bundle, I'd get a mediocre hard drive, but if I get the core, it's more expensive to upgrade later. But I'll just wait till everything 360 comes cheaper. It's a shame it doesn't include HD-DVD right out of the box. And I think they should have waited till 2006 for that, a bigger hard drive, 1080p (which is called “Real Hi definition” for something), gameplay, and perhaps a little more power, instead of remaining in the Xbox 1.5 level, improving solely on power and LIVE, but not that much.
Their only "advantage" is LIVE which costs 60 dollars a year, and that sucks because I mostly play on vacations/holidays so I would have to pay the more expensive fee of 10 dollar a month, but whatever. And still, I don't even know if it is going to be an advantage. We have yet to try Nintendo Wi-Fi connection, and Sony's new redesign of their shitty PSO, which don't cost as much. Some say LIVE is "worth it" because you can see it's that good for what MSFT spends on it (twice what you actually pay, or that's what they said), which is half truth because I just think it costs MSFT so much because they are not an efficient company.
I criticize 360 and nor revolution for trying to be something like a PS3, which in fact is half way between Revo and PS3. I don't criticize revolution because they aren't as hypocritical, and because at least Nintendo is also doing a big leap in other areas, perhaps the most important: gameplay (and they also haven’t ruled out the possibility of HDTV capabilities anyway). And I just consider Sony to have a huge advantage with Blu-ray, at least for me. I seriously can’t wait to get 10 seasons of “The Simpsons” in one Disc, for example (Fox is going to publish in Blu-ray format anyway, so that could happen). I just see these two as the both the great extremes, I don’t want the “middle” where you are halfway between gameplay experiences and next generation media.
I also said that I'd love a 2TB disk on my console, but don't get me wrong, I never said I needed it. What I meant was that if I ever wanted a hard drive, it would better be a big one. So If I buy an ultimate bundle, I'd get a mediocre hard drive, but if I get the core, it's more expensive to upgrade later. But I'll just wait till everything 360 comes cheaper. It's a shame it doesn't include HD-DVD right out of the box. And I think they should have waited till 2006 for that, a bigger hard drive, 1080p (which is called “Real Hi definition” for something), gameplay, and perhaps a little more power, instead of remaining in the Xbox 1.5 level, improving solely on power and LIVE, but not that much.
Their only "advantage" is LIVE which costs 60 dollars a year, and that sucks because I mostly play on vacations/holidays so I would have to pay the more expensive fee of 10 dollar a month, but whatever. And still, I don't even know if it is going to be an advantage. We have yet to try Nintendo Wi-Fi connection, and Sony's new redesign of their shitty PSO, which don't cost as much. Some say LIVE is "worth it" because you can see it's that good for what MSFT spends on it (twice what you actually pay, or that's what they said), which is half truth because I just think it costs MSFT so much because they are not an efficient company.
Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:37PM (Unverified) said
b-
If you are judging whether or not a system is next gen or not based on the optical drive, you are way wrong.
Using your logic, you would therefor have 1 next gen console and two that are not. Totally wrong (to me).
We know you hate the 360, and the only reason you wish it was delayed untill 2006 is so your two favorite companies didn't fall so far behind. We know you don't want whats best for MS and their xbox.
Which to me seems like you would like the xbox and the 360 a little bit. Without the xbox, ps3 probably WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN AS POWERFUL. MS and thier competition pushed sony with the ps3. We know Nintendo woulnd't have done so.
And your comment is way off:
"I criticize 360 and nor revolution for trying to be something like a PS3..."
The 360 isn't trying to be anything. Its being itself. If anything, the ps3 would be trying to be a 360, being that it comes out later correct?
The revo is a great extreme? what is it a great extreme of, normality? averageness? it is underpowered, and the only thing it has going (supposedly) is a remote that will make one arm really strong. Yeah, extreme, extremely lame.
And no High Def drive does not mean something is hypocrytical. DVD player support high Definition, but they don't have High Def drives, so does that mean those companies and products are hypocrytical about High Definition? (the answer is no)
If you are judging whether or not a system is next gen or not based on the optical drive, you are way wrong.
Using your logic, you would therefor have 1 next gen console and two that are not. Totally wrong (to me).
We know you hate the 360, and the only reason you wish it was delayed untill 2006 is so your two favorite companies didn't fall so far behind. We know you don't want whats best for MS and their xbox.
Which to me seems like you would like the xbox and the 360 a little bit. Without the xbox, ps3 probably WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN AS POWERFUL. MS and thier competition pushed sony with the ps3. We know Nintendo woulnd't have done so.
And your comment is way off:
"I criticize 360 and nor revolution for trying to be something like a PS3..."
The 360 isn't trying to be anything. Its being itself. If anything, the ps3 would be trying to be a 360, being that it comes out later correct?
The revo is a great extreme? what is it a great extreme of, normality? averageness? it is underpowered, and the only thing it has going (supposedly) is a remote that will make one arm really strong. Yeah, extreme, extremely lame.
And no High Def drive does not mean something is hypocrytical. DVD player support high Definition, but they don't have High Def drives, so does that mean those companies and products are hypocrytical about High Definition? (the answer is no)
Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:37PM (Unverified) said
I don't think he hates it so much as he doesn't see the good parts of it. He's just a pessimist.
Instead of the HiDef, Live, Media Center, and games, he sees the "no 1080p, live gold account costs, no Blu Ray."
Honestly, the guy with a Windows Media Center is going to come out on top as far as all this mumbo jumbo. They'll have Blu Ray, they'll have HD DVD, they'll have hybrids if they come along, and they'll easily upgrade to include anything else that comes along in the next 5 years. They'll be able to stream all of these things directly to their Xbox 360.
The games, which in this generation Microsoft seems to have a very good handle on, are important.
Live is a huge advantage, and a huge boost to those games. b clearly just doesn't have time to use it, or can't afford it, or doesn't have time to play games online (despite having plenty to play offline?) and so he won't bother looking at the benefits of such a well thought out service.
52 weeks = 104 weekend days
60$ / 104 = 58 cents a day.
And that's assuming you never ever play it during the week. And if that's the case, why even buy a console? Just drop 50 bucks on a PC game and forget about all this.
Instead of the HiDef, Live, Media Center, and games, he sees the "no 1080p, live gold account costs, no Blu Ray."
Honestly, the guy with a Windows Media Center is going to come out on top as far as all this mumbo jumbo. They'll have Blu Ray, they'll have HD DVD, they'll have hybrids if they come along, and they'll easily upgrade to include anything else that comes along in the next 5 years. They'll be able to stream all of these things directly to their Xbox 360.
The games, which in this generation Microsoft seems to have a very good handle on, are important.
Live is a huge advantage, and a huge boost to those games. b clearly just doesn't have time to use it, or can't afford it, or doesn't have time to play games online (despite having plenty to play offline?) and so he won't bother looking at the benefits of such a well thought out service.
52 weeks = 104 weekend days
60$ / 104 = 58 cents a day.
And that's assuming you never ever play it during the week. And if that's the case, why even buy a console? Just drop 50 bucks on a PC game and forget about all this.
Posted: Dec 18th 2005 9:37PM (Unverified) said
ok can i just ask one thing.....
will ps3 have a central online thingy????
this is really important for next-generation and it can be a huge succes, they can also make every xbox fanboy eat their words.
will ps3 have a central online thingy????
this is really important for next-generation and it can be a huge succes, they can also make every xbox fanboy eat their words.
Featured Stories
Stiq Figures, May 7 - 13: I'mma can't use any of my dominoes edition
Posted on May 20th 2012 11:30PM


