| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (8)

Posted: Jan 4th 2006 9:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, there's always Stringer's speech tommorow morning. Weren't we promised "significant presence" for the PS3 at CES back at E3? Hmm, well that sucks big time if they don't show any new stuff until next month's Playstation Meeting
Reply

Posted: Jan 4th 2006 10:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
WOW!!! So instead of making must have 100% ORIGINAL system sellers I get to watch TV anywhere in the world with my PSP and other new features I could care less about.



Good job Sony!!!



/end sarcasim
Reply

Posted: Jan 5th 2006 1:06AM Agent X said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I hope to see some new footage of Daxter really soon. This is one of the most promising games of the new year, and one I am eagerly anticipating!

Reply

Posted: Jan 5th 2006 9:06AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
OK Sony, nobody cares about location free TV. You're putting way too much money on a horse very few are interested in here... why on EARTH am I going to buy your base station for this? If I could watch TV anytime, anywhere, this would be one thing. But I need to be near a wi-fi connection. Given the lack of decent speed public wifi access points, this is HARDLY location free. Example:



I'm trying to play World of Warcraft on my Powerbook in JFK airport. There's "free wifi" there, but I'm getting so much lag the game is unplayable. Too many people logged on, not enough bandwidth, I don't care. It doesn't work nearly well enough to make me believe that a live feed of TV will come through properly.



Sony, I don't freaking care. I was completely onboard with the PSP when it came out. I wanted to play games, and you let me down. Stop trying to invent the wheel, you stink at it. I loved your Playstation, and I'm hoping you can capture more of that magic on PS3 than you did on PS2.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2006 4:47AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ok guys, how many times do I have to tell you? It's I COULDN'T care less about. Meaning, it isn't possible to cary any less than you care about it now. Now, how in the hell does COULD care less about make any sense.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2006 11:14AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thank you Vince Carter!



To everyone else on the internet:



Vince has a firm grasp on the niceties of caring less, or not. I get that feeling every time someone says "they could care less", you know, the one you get when someone rakes their fingernails down a chalk board.



If you could care less, then you are not at a point of absolute apathy. In fact, you are leaving open the possibility that you care very much, as you are indicating that there is a whole range of caring that is below your current level of pathos. If you don't care at all, then you COULDN'T CARE LESS. Let this be a lesson to you all.



Thank you Vince Carter. You saved my Monday.
Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2006 11:27AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sorry to double post, but I figured I should separate the off-topic from the on-topic, the wheat from the chaff, etc.



This is awefully funny. Sony did the same thing competing against the Dreamcast. "Hype, hype, hype, delay, hype some more, delay, here is your console. It is not everything we promised? Ah, sucks to be you."



I had been holding out some hope for a post-holiday PS3 release from Sony. Not for purposes of buying, mind you, as I own a 360 and am happy with it, but I had hoped that they were being smart and using this for business strategy, instead of incompetent. There was always the possibility that Sony was quiet on the PS3 front during and leading up to the holiday season to protect PS2 sales. However, it is becoming painfully obvious that they just don't have their stuff together.

I find it interesting that, in many ways, Sony and Microsoft are standing where their competitor stood in the last generation. Microsoft is releasing first and has more games in development and seems to be opening up its genre library in a big way. Sony is releasing late, with a smaller library, and, relative to the PS2 offerings, a less diverse catalogue of games. That may be due to the fact that we really don't know what the launch titles will be. Sony yet may have some sinister purpose for which they have foregone releasing information that would entice gamers to hold off on purchasing a 360 (as enough become available to satisfy demand), but I doubt it.

Reply

Posted: Jan 9th 2006 4:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The silence you hear from Sony is just another in a long line of misfirings they have had in this latest clash with Microsoft.



As a gamer first and foremost more than a console layalist, I am very disappointed that Sony is still refusing to produce an online gaming service in the mold of Xbox live. In my opinion this is a major mistake on their part. As good as Xbox Live has always been, Microsoft has really taken it to the next level with the 360.



It's funny to me that one of the most popular games on this "next-gen" system is an Asteroids type game, albeit with tremendous graphics, called Geometry Wars, which is only available through Xbox Live Marketplace.



I love my 360, and have had no problems with it, thankfully. It was well worth the 11 hours I spent in line to get it at launch.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW