| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (18)

Posted: Apr 8th 2006 3:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Are You kidding? This is the awesomest game ever! So worth 60 bucks! Frank,Did you hit your head or something?
Reply

Posted: Jan 26th 2006 5:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh really this is not next-gen a totally crap piece of game.

PS3 wil be much, much better.
Reply

Posted: Jan 26th 2006 6:02PM einhanderkiller said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Oh really this is not next-gen a totally crap piece of game.

PS3 wil be much, much better."

Your name is "Xbox Fanboy". Why are you praising the PS3? :/

I'm confused. Is it opposite day?
WHY DIDN'T YOU GUYS TELL ME THAT IT'S OPPOSITE DAY?
Reply

Posted: Jan 26th 2006 6:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have to totally disagree with your rating. I have nearly every 360 game and this is the only one that I would categorize as complete crap. Have you honestly played this? I played it on an HD plasma and the graphics are horrible. The enemies seem to be crappy renderings on a beautiful background. Throwing flaming spears at sticker bushes to clear the path is game play? How about spinning around a post to open a gate?This game is $60 well wasted.
Reply

Posted: Jan 26th 2006 6:51PM chrisgrant said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Let's say we disagree Bob.
Reply

Posted: Jan 26th 2006 7:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If nothing else this game is an excellent 'experience'. It may not have the best gameplay but as an extremely polished cinematic experience it is a trip worth taking. The lack of a HUD is also refreshing with some innovative control aspects. I would not recommend buying it at $60 but it is an ultimate rental. I can see being bitter for buying it at that price but for those who rent it you won't regret a minute of this game.
Reply

Posted: Jan 26th 2006 7:18PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm with Bob.
The graphics are not that good. It's way too dark and drab. (often 2 or 3 shades of color at most)
The voice acting is terrible. Only Kong is well animated.
There are no cutscenes and hence you often find yourself looking in one direction while something you are supposed to see happens in another.

The gameplay is repetitive...as Bob said, the two main elements are burning bushes to clear a path and finding levers to open gates...plus shooting at all sorts of creatures that jump at you...
The story is without emotion...I never cared about any of the characters...

Playing as Kong is the only satisfying piece of the game...even though the New York level is quite bad...

Brief, this is the kind of game that feels like work after 3 hours of play.

I would give it 4.5/10.
Reply

Posted: Jan 26th 2006 8:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thank you for posting this review so quickly Joystiq. After all I waited a few months after the release of the game and held off just so I could read your review and make a decision on whether to purchase it.
Reply

Posted: Jan 26th 2006 8:45PM AoE said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
granted, 8.5's a little high for a game with no replayability, but have Mr. Grant and I been playing different copies than the rest of you, or what?

I've played it on both an HDTV and a monitor. In both cases, the video was never too dark. Granted some of the gameplay gets repetitive, and some levels get boring, but just when you're about to give up and pop in a better game; they throw something breathtaking, or entertaining at the very least at you.

As with BG&E, the integration of the story into the actual gameplay is what made this game something that, despite it's flaws, and as much as i wanted to (it being a movie game) I was unable to hate.

I will say I noticed at least a handful of bugs on nearly every level of the game, and it had moments that made it feel REALLY rushed to market, but even with that, It's still good stuff.

And as for it being the worst of the 360 launch titles Bob? I can only assume you haven't played NFS: Most Wanted (15fps and tearing at EVERY corner? complete crap), Kameo (boring gameplay, subpar graphics, pedantic storyline), or PD0 (don't even get me started on this pile of doo-doo). Go play those games, and then get back to us ;)
Reply

Posted: Jan 26th 2006 9:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This game is crap and i finished it in a day .The graphic are nothing special and the animation is laughable for a so called next gen game.The game play is boring and sluggish,It way to dark on a normal TV too.I just tried out the regular Xbox version weeks ago and i can hardly tell the difference between them .I rarely trade games in but this one went back the same week.Just another reason i put the 360 on Ebay.
Reply

Posted: Jan 26th 2006 9:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Peter Jackson was dissapointed with the Lord of The Rings games and he thinks This King Kong game is good ?.WTF is he smoking.It's about time he did something original himself too.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2006 1:15AM ushman said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
are you people serious??? i thought the rating was right on the mark. i think you guys must of got the ps2 version of the game or something
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2006 2:03AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The simple gameplay completely sucks you in. The visuals are at such a caliber that I think all games should strive to match if not to surpass it. This is one of few games that actually does a good job of making you feel as if you were outside. If this game is too dark its because your tv is not properly calibrated. My only cripe with this game was its short length. I was actually rather sad when the game ended so quickly. The reviewer of this article was dead on, unlike the overly pretentious self satisfied as well as jaded "gamers" who posted the above comments. However, I do agree this game is not worth $60 simply because, as I have said, it is too short of an experience. This game is very ripe for renting though.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2006 3:03AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I actually liked the game better than the movie (I was pretty disappointed in the film). It really was a great title. Too bad it wasn't about twice as long and it didn't fall apart in the New York levels. All in all was it worth the $29 I paid for it? Yep. Just my 2 cents (or $29.99).

Sloopydrew's XBOX 360 January 7th, 2006 - January 26th, 2006. Aged 19 days. Passed away due to natural causes (red ring of death). XBOX Live Arcade Gauntlet and Geometry Wars: $10.00. 3 mediocre games: $180.00. XBOX Live Gold subscription: $50.00. A broken 360? Worthless.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2006 7:50AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i'd tend to agree more with the people who think it's crap. i mean it's not bad, but it's not a good game either, and it annoyed me more than Kameo. it's one of the worst looking 360 launch games, if not the worst, and that's visible even on a standard definition tv. some of the graphics look about at the level of some N64 games like for instance when Ann wakes you up. it can be fun at times, like a few of the King Kong sequences.

it's definetly one of the better movie to game conversions in a long while, but that's not, in itself, reason enough for such praise.

it is an incredibly easy 1000 gamerscore points though if you're into collecting them.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2006 10:03AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
god I absolutely hated this game and sold it. This is the first game that actually made me nauseous the frame rate wasn't smooth enough. Also, some of the game mechanics are questionable.
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2006 10:23AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i remember playing this at the xbox kiosks back in nov. i thoguht the graphics were pretty amazing..espcially the foliage and rocks and stuff..characters look ok..nothing special..but kong looked pretty good and that sequence was pretty entertaining..overall it was not that fun ..the controls were iffy on some parts ont he demo...it only held my attention for 2-3 minutes before i went back to COD2 lol...
Reply

Posted: Jan 27th 2006 12:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I read this review and it's like being in the bizarro world.

The game is so bad it seems more like an April Fool's joke than a serious game effort. The graphics are bad, the action is lame, it gives no feel for the King Kong experience.

Did the reviewer even see the game?
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW