Joystiq Review: Peter Jackson's King Kong (Xbox 360)
After disappointment with EA’s
video game adaptations of his The Lord of the Rings films, director Peter
Jackson sought famed game designer Michel Ancel (and his team at Ubisoft’s Montpellier studios) to help him
create a game for his latest movie, an adaptation of King Kong. With (the verbosely titled) Peter Jackson's King Kong: The Official Game of the Movie, the two of them have created the rarest of things: an exceptional movie-based game. The finished product is unusually polished; the graphics, voicework, story, and gameplay have all been scripted into an elegant, if notably short, product.
Monkey Ape Business
King Kong puts you in the first-person perspective of Jack Driscoll as you traverse Skull Island. Your weapons are limited to a single gun at a time, or bones and spears you’ll find littered throughout the island. There is no on-screen display telling you how many bullets you have left or what level your health is at. With the press of a button Jack will call out his ammo count, and if hit your screen will flash red until you recuperate. The simplicity of this system eliminates any interference between you and the game.

The game is divided into short chapters, each one a small exercise: finding Ann, saving Hayes, or defeating a T-Rex. While these stages are linear - don’t expect to wander off the track and investigate Skull Island - they are thrilling. There is a palpable tension propelling you; with a massive T-Rex just behind you or an enormous chasm beneath you, the game excels at pushing you through it.
The few scenes where you play as Kong himself - er, yourself - are as different from Jack's scenes as Kong is from Jack. Playing as Jack, patience and wit help you survive. As Kong, you run, climb and swing with no chance of falling to your death. It too is straightforward and scripted, but manages to capture the size and strength of the massive ape. Playing as Kong during the final scenes in New York City offers a unique point o
f view both similar to the movie, but perhaps
even surpassing it. The initial realization that you are controlling Kong, shackled on screen, is frightening. Breaking
free from his bondage and rampaging across midtown Manhattan is thrilling, though fatalistic: you already know what
happens, it is inevitable. Being on rails in this stage lends a certain poignancy to Kong's fate. Perfect Dark Kong?
The games graphics are, for the most part, exceptional. The art direction of the entire game is superb, and is equally owed to both Ubisoft’s expertise and Jackson’s vision. The scale and detail of the environments, their inhabitants, and the lack of interface obstruction, creates a uniquely immersive experience. Curiously, the admission that the Xbox 360 port was tested solely on high definition monitors, resulting in an image that is often too dark on standard definition televisions, wasn't apparent to this gamer. If anything, many scenes were too dark on both high definition and standard definition screens, with no distinction between the two.

The game has also accrued a reputation for being especially loose with its gamerscore points. You can gather every single achievement the game offers, netting you a cool 1000 points, by doing nothing more than beating it straight through. Even more curious was the revelation there is indeed a second unlockable ending, attainable after completing the game once, and then again while scoring over a certain number of points; a bona fide achievement goal if ever there was one. Despite this obvious attraction, it's hard to recommend the Xbox 360 variant when, at $60, it offers little extra in exchange for that premium price. The title's online scoreboards are outside of the Xbox 360 Live service, and the graphics, while a notable improvement, lend little to the gameplay above and beyond their surface appeal.
Despite being linear and, at six to eight hours,
exceedingly short, King Kong never feels simplified. It was designed, in part,
for novice gamers, eager to play a polished, cinematic game without cumbersome controls and punishing difficulty. But
gaming veterans will also find an elegant and thoughtfully designed game, owing as much to classic survival horror
titles as it does to the movie it's based on.Overall Rating: 8.5 out of 10
At $60, Kong is a very highly recommended rental, if for no other reason than to rack up all of those gamerscore points. But if you're interested in owning one of the best movie based games out there, either pick up a cheaper current-gen version, or wait for that price to come down.
(Update 1: Score has been amended to reflect Joystiq's grading scale using increments of 0.5)











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Jake Briggs @ Apr 8th 2006 3:03PM
Are You kidding? This is the awesomest game ever! So worth 60 bucks! Frank,Did you hit your head or something?
Xbox Fanboy @ Jan 26th 2006 5:25PM
Oh really this is not next-gen a totally crap piece of game.
PS3 wil be much, much better.
Einhanderkiller @ Jan 26th 2006 6:02PM
"Oh really this is not next-gen a totally crap piece of game.
PS3 wil be much, much better."
Your name is "Xbox Fanboy". Why are you praising the PS3? :/
I'm confused. Is it opposite day?
WHY DIDN'T YOU GUYS TELL ME THAT IT'S OPPOSITE DAY?
Bob Johnson @ Jan 26th 2006 6:06PM
I have to totally disagree with your rating. I have nearly every 360 game and this is the only one that I would categorize as complete crap. Have you honestly played this? I played it on an HD plasma and the graphics are horrible. The enemies seem to be crappy renderings on a beautiful background. Throwing flaming spears at sticker bushes to clear the path is game play? How about spinning around a post to open a gate?This game is $60 well wasted.
C. Grant @ Jan 26th 2006 6:51PM
Let's say we disagree Bob.
Dave @ Jan 26th 2006 7:06PM
If nothing else this game is an excellent 'experience'. It may not have the best gameplay but as an extremely polished cinematic experience it is a trip worth taking. The lack of a HUD is also refreshing with some innovative control aspects. I would not recommend buying it at $60 but it is an ultimate rental. I can see being bitter for buying it at that price but for those who rent it you won't regret a minute of this game.
Dralt @ Jan 26th 2006 7:18PM
I'm with Bob.
The graphics are not that good. It's way too dark and drab. (often 2 or 3 shades of color at most)
The voice acting is terrible. Only Kong is well animated.
There are no cutscenes and hence you often find yourself looking in one direction while something you are supposed to see happens in another.
The gameplay is repetitive...as Bob said, the two main elements are burning bushes to clear a path and finding levers to open gates...plus shooting at all sorts of creatures that jump at you...
The story is without emotion...I never cared about any of the characters...
Playing as Kong is the only satisfying piece of the game...even though the New York level is quite bad...
Brief, this is the kind of game that feels like work after 3 hours of play.
I would give it 4.5/10.
Nintendohaw @ Jan 26th 2006 8:05PM
Thank you for posting this review so quickly Joystiq. After all I waited a few months after the release of the game and held off just so I could read your review and make a decision on whether to purchase it.
AoE @ Jan 26th 2006 8:45PM
granted, 8.5's a little high for a game with no replayability, but have Mr. Grant and I been playing different copies than the rest of you, or what?
I've played it on both an HDTV and a monitor. In both cases, the video was never too dark. Granted some of the gameplay gets repetitive, and some levels get boring, but just when you're about to give up and pop in a better game; they throw something breathtaking, or entertaining at the very least at you.
As with BG&E, the integration of the story into the actual gameplay is what made this game something that, despite it's flaws, and as much as i wanted to (it being a movie game) I was unable to hate.
I will say I noticed at least a handful of bugs on nearly every level of the game, and it had moments that made it feel REALLY rushed to market, but even with that, It's still good stuff.
And as for it being the worst of the 360 launch titles Bob? I can only assume you haven't played NFS: Most Wanted (15fps and tearing at EVERY corner? complete crap), Kameo (boring gameplay, subpar graphics, pedantic storyline), or PD0 (don't even get me started on this pile of doo-doo). Go play those games, and then get back to us ;)
Tech @ Jan 26th 2006 9:22PM
This game is crap and i finished it in a day .The graphic are nothing special and the animation is laughable for a so called next gen game.The game play is boring and sluggish,It way to dark on a normal TV too.I just tried out the regular Xbox version weeks ago and i can hardly tell the difference between them .I rarely trade games in but this one went back the same week.Just another reason i put the 360 on Ebay.
Superzapper @ Jan 26th 2006 9:29PM
Peter Jackson was dissapointed with the Lord of The Rings games and he thinks This King Kong game is good ?.WTF is he smoking.It's about time he did something original himself too.
ushman @ Jan 27th 2006 1:15AM
are you people serious??? i thought the rating was right on the mark. i think you guys must of got the ps2 version of the game or something
Bodah @ Jan 27th 2006 2:03AM
The simple gameplay completely sucks you in. The visuals are at such a caliber that I think all games should strive to match if not to surpass it. This is one of few games that actually does a good job of making you feel as if you were outside. If this game is too dark its because your tv is not properly calibrated. My only cripe with this game was its short length. I was actually rather sad when the game ended so quickly. The reviewer of this article was dead on, unlike the overly pretentious self satisfied as well as jaded "gamers" who posted the above comments. However, I do agree this game is not worth $60 simply because, as I have said, it is too short of an experience. This game is very ripe for renting though.
Sloopydrew @ Jan 27th 2006 3:03AM
I actually liked the game better than the movie (I was pretty disappointed in the film). It really was a great title. Too bad it wasn't about twice as long and it didn't fall apart in the New York levels. All in all was it worth the $29 I paid for it? Yep. Just my 2 cents (or $29.99).
Sloopydrew's XBOX 360 January 7th, 2006 - January 26th, 2006. Aged 19 days. Passed away due to natural causes (red ring of death). XBOX Live Arcade Gauntlet and Geometry Wars: $10.00. 3 mediocre games: $180.00. XBOX Live Gold subscription: $50.00. A broken 360? Worthless.
soco @ Jan 27th 2006 7:50AM
i'd tend to agree more with the people who think it's crap. i mean it's not bad, but it's not a good game either, and it annoyed me more than Kameo. it's one of the worst looking 360 launch games, if not the worst, and that's visible even on a standard definition tv. some of the graphics look about at the level of some N64 games like for instance when Ann wakes you up. it can be fun at times, like a few of the King Kong sequences.
it's definetly one of the better movie to game conversions in a long while, but that's not, in itself, reason enough for such praise.
it is an incredibly easy 1000 gamerscore points though if you're into collecting them.
helo @ Jan 27th 2006 10:03AM
god I absolutely hated this game and sold it. This is the first game that actually made me nauseous the frame rate wasn't smooth enough. Also, some of the game mechanics are questionable.
Embassy @ Jan 27th 2006 10:23AM
i remember playing this at the xbox kiosks back in nov. i thoguht the graphics were pretty amazing..espcially the foliage and rocks and stuff..characters look ok..nothing special..but kong looked pretty good and that sequence was pretty entertaining..overall it was not that fun ..the controls were iffy on some parts ont he demo...it only held my attention for 2-3 minutes before i went back to COD2 lol...
Frank the Commish @ Jan 27th 2006 12:13PM
I read this review and it's like being in the bizarro world.
The game is so bad it seems more like an April Fool's joke than a serious game effort. The graphics are bad, the action is lame, it gives no feel for the King Kong experience.
Did the reviewer even see the game?