Eurogamer reports that a leaked
Sony marketing document reveals further details about the God of War sequel. Referred to as God of War
2, the game is currently scheduled for a February 2007 release on the PlayStation 2. The sequel will build upon
the successful elements of the first game. This time around, Kratos will be able to ride Pegasus, sport the Golden
Fleece, and even rob Icarus of his wings. According to the marketing document, God of War 2 will sport
next-genish visuals.So why doesn't Sony make God of War 2 a PS3 launch title? With over 100 million PS2 units in circulation, the answer should be clear. But rest assured, the God of War franchise will make it onto Sony's next-gen console the third time around.



















(Page 1) Reader Comments
Can't wait for this one.
This kind of stuff is why I'm holding off on NextGen for now. There's better stuff coming out for PS2 and XBox. It looks like I'll wait till this Christmas before making any nextgen decisions...
Reply
Maybe the short term income is small at the beginning, but PS3 will eventually be much more popular than the PS2.
They can only sell God of War 2 for a year on the PS2, tops. But if they released it for the PS3, we're talking about 3+ years.
Reply
Reply
The economics of this are obviously in favor of a PS2 release although a PS2 and PS# release I would think is more likely...
I though will not be investing in PS3 and look forward to seeing this game on PS2 while duking it out on my N Revolution...
Reply
Reply
The puzzles in it were fun and were really well integrated with the rest of the game's action. I just home they make them just a little bit harder for this one.
Reply
Reply
With this, they help reinforce brand loyality towards PlayStation, and a lot more money is earned, let alone the PS2 specs are fully taken advantage off, instead of cutting their generation short in order to deliver a 1.5 experience.
Once devs learn to use PS3 kits, we will probably see a decent God of War 3 and a decent Shadow of the Colossus.
"Maybe because no one wants the PS3...."
Can't joystiq immediately delete posts from trolls? Thanks.
Reply
The PS3 can play PS2 titles, so those who wish to play it on the PS2 will be able to, as well as those who wawnt to play it on their PS3's. That means it can have as long a life as it would have if it had been a strictly PS3 release, along with the bonus of larger sales do to the fact that those who only have PS2's will be able to play it.
Thanks to backwards compatibility if they wanted to release a new PS1 game they could, and it would capture players who currently only have PS1's, but also PS2, and PS3 owners. It woudln't sell as well in light of today's gamers screaming for graphical improvement, but that doesn't mean it couldn't be done.
A game like God of War will have the high demand though, and those who bought a PS3 will prolly still pick it up, even if it is a PS2 title; while Sony will laugh their way to the bank, thanks to it also picking up sales from current gen owners.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
"Since most PS2 games will work on PS3 (unlike Xbox 1.5) this shouldn't be a problem. If you have a PS2, play it on the PS2. If you have a PS3, you can still play it on the PS3 with better graphics. It's a win win situation for Sony AND customers."
What exactly are you basing your assumptions on there?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
ITS FEBRUARY 2006!!!, and they are discussing a PS2 game for 2007? By 2007, the PS2 should be in the bargain bin...unless the PS3 still brand new, and still $400 in 2007.
I doubt we will see any Xbox 1 games released in 2007. Nintendo should be selling the Revolution in record numbers by then too. Sony has put all their eggs in one basket, and now they cant deliver before they spoil. Its to bad. I love my minidisc player too.
Reply
Does any know of any game currently avliable (or avlibale soon) other than GT4 that supports 1080i on the PS2?
Reply
Reply
i just wish it was coming out THIS february.
Reply
The PS2 Slimline can't even play every PS2 game.
What makes you think the PS3 will be any better at backwards compatibility than the 360?
If a new version of a current gen system can't play the same games as the old version... that bodes poorly for the next gen.
Fortunately people like you don't ever question things like this and keep lapping up the exaggerations all 3 game companies spin. That keeps the rest of us swarmed in hype that never comes true.
Reply
Sales will be more massive on ps2. 100 million installed base is a no brainer. PS3 is only gonna have around 5-15million installed base consoles out there by mid-late 2007.
"think this is pretty simple really. I dont' recall where I read it but Kutargi-san stated that support for the PS2 will continue for the next 3-5 years AFTER the launch of the PS3. So obviously, they aren't expecting the disgustingly high sell rate this time around-especially if the PS3 is "
I heard this from sony with the ps1-ps2 crossover. The support from sony in house developers will twindle off within a yr of ps3 release. Support will then die off very quickly with the better developers (it's already started really), then you will see nothing but budget games from crappy developers that rush stuff out with minimal effort or development expense, knowing that there will be plenty of people to lap up any new release on the old hardware.
This is how it works.
Reply
Sony is showing no faith in their ability to sell PS3's between now and the launch of this game...
...in 2007!
The PS3 is nowhere near ready.
Reply
What makes you think the PS3 will be any better at backwards compatibility than the 360?"
by MosquitoControl
What PS2 titles can't the PS2 slimline play ?.This is news to me.
Reply
Clint, the "Xbox 1.5" tag has been done to death. Some originality, if you please.
Reply
Reply
What makes you think the PS3 will be any better at backwards compatibility than the 360?"
You mean, Final Fantasy XI?
Secondly, the 360 uses emulation, software emulation. The Playstation 3 will play PS2 and PS1 games using hardware, not software emulation.
If this report is true, I'm not suprised. The PS2 user base is huge, mega huge and ofcourse they'll target it. Most of the people who are getting it have played GOW1 and have PS2, but that doesn't mean they'll buy a PS3, so they're targetting the audience they want.
But I doubt this report is true. Isn't Jaffe working on a PSP game?
Reply
Reply
That's not true. The PS3 will use emulation to run older PS system title. The architecture is vastly different, as both the PS2 and PS3 use eccentric methods of processing.
However, due to its pure number crunching power, the PS3 will not have a problem with PS2 games, just like the 360 has no problem with Xbox games. It's only a matter of having programmers taking the time work on each title which, hopefully, they do more of than MS did with the 360.
Reply
PS3 launch, price doubts batter Sony stock
Share price sinks 3.6 percent on predictions of $900-per-console manufacturing cost, spring 2007 US launch; contradictory corporate statements follow.
Across the United States, most Americans were relaxing this Monday, courtesy of the long Presidents' Day holiday weekend. Not so across the Pacific in the corporate offices of Sony. The electronics and entertainment giant saw its stock price sink 3.6 percent, dropping to 5,300 yen ($45) per share. The fall affected the entire Tokyo stock market, with the Nikkei index dropping 1.75 percent to 15,437.93 yen ($130.57).
Monday's drop follows a 2.8 percent decline in Sony stock on Friday, after Wall Street stock-brokerage firm Merrill Lynch published a report skeptical of the company's next-generation console plans. It predicted that the launch of the PlayStation 3 console could be delayed by 6 to 12 months from its current spring 2006 window, resulting in an autumn launch in Japan and a late-2006 or early-2007 launch in the US.
"We wrote last November that Sony’s design choices for the PS3 had resulted in an expensive and difficult-to-manufacture product," read the report, "and we think that we're seeing the consequences of those choices play out now. In particular, we think the problem points are the Sony Cell processor and the Blu-ray drive." Merrill Lynch also cited heat-generation issues with PS3 hardware and the far-from-finished state of most games for the platform as factors.
While other analysts have predicted that the PS3 might not hit North America until Q4 2006 or Q1 2007--which would miss the all-important holiday shopping season--Merrill Lynch's stature made many a trader skittish. The fires of unease were fueled further by another component of the report, which predicted that the manufacturing cost of the console could be much higher than previous estimates of around $500 per unit.
"Our updated analysis indicates that the initial bill of [production] materials for PS3 could approach $900," read the report. The report said that the production cost of a single Cell processor will be $230 at launch, with the Blu-ray drive setting Sony back $350 per unit. However, the $900 price tag presumably includes a $100 optional hard drive, as a breakdown of component costs in the report totals just $795.
If the $900 estimate is correct, that means the PS3 would have to sell for around $775-$800 to maintain a $100-$125 per-unit loss similar to that of Microsoft's Xbox 360. If the $795 estimate is correct, the console could sell for around $699--within the range recently forecast by a group of analysts and developers polled by CNN/Money.
Merrill Lynch expects that PS3 production costs will start falling after 2007, when Sony can shift the Cell chip's manufacture from the complex 90nm process to the more cost-effective 65mn process. Scaling Blu-ray to other devices will also bring down the drive's price. Merrill Lynch predicts that the PS3's production cost will fall to $320 in the three years after its launch, by which time the Cell will cost only $60 per unit and the Blu-ray drive only $100 per unit.
In the wake of the report, Sony issued a series of contradictory statements. In Japan, Sony Computer Entertainment spokesperson Kei Sakaguchi flatly denied that there would be any delay to Bloomberg News and other press outlets, saying, "There isn't any change in our plan to release the console in spring 2006."
However, a Sony Computer Entertainment America spokesperson was more cautious when she spoke with USA Today. "We're aiming for spring, but we haven't announced specific regions," she told the daily broadsheet. "We're waiting for [final PS3 specifications] until the last possible minute, but the launch could be pushed back if they're not decided soon."
Reply
Reply
over i love
this game i mean after the first game there is no way they can top
this but i am sure that this one will be bloddier and better then the
first
Reply
Reply
l83rz LUKEY BOI
Reply