A warning to curious Joystiq'ers: the video presented above is long... very, very long. It's a (presumably) undoctored video detailing the time to get from menu to gameplay in THQ's WWE SmackDown! Vs. RAW 2006 for the PSP. The following sites had this to say about the loads:
- Gamespot: "You will need to suffer through some lengthy loads prior to wrestler entrances, and then another lengthy load prior to the match. Thankfully, the in-game action doesn't suffer from any slowness or technical issues, but getting into a match does take a touch longer than it ought to."
- 1UP: "...being a PSP game, you should expect some ridiculous load times, which thankfully can be shortened by simply turning off those entrances that you've already seen a million times over."
- Yahoo! Games: "The load times may annoy you, but they're pretty much on par with the rest of the PSP library."
[Thanks, Joe]
UPDATE: Updated the video link after the earlier one stopped working.













(Page 1) Reader Comments
Reply
Reply
Reply
I'll stick to my 2 second ds load times, thank you very much.
Reply
on a side Note...The benny hill song made my night..
Reply
m3mnoch.
Reply
With that said, I would have totally tossed my PSP into a dusty corner and actually went outside to play with nuts if I had to be tortured with that IRL.
Reply
Reply
"And IGN actually gave that an 8.7?!? Flush some more credibility right down the toilet why don'tcha."
Talk about being biased...Gamespot, 1up.com and Yahoo! games all gave nearly identical scores. But then again you wouldn't know that b/c you didn't click the links.
I wonder what is worse...this game or the EA titles? The EA PSP titles have some pretty pathetic load times as well.
I wonder how long it would actually be if you actually watched each cinematic completely.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Now, of course, this was SEASON MODE. If you wanted to play an exhibition game, you'd get there in half the time.
Reply
Reply
THQ and/or Jakk's just need to learn how to manage the PS2 and PSP memory better. Actually strike the word "better" and replace it with "period."
It's also worth pointing out that for both the video time and the PS2 time, two cut scenes were skipped. Yes, it's not interaction, but they are there for a reason. Skipping them just makes you stare at loading screens with less interruption.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Sony, "U R teh poo-head, we big dumb gorrilaz put big fast wisbang umd n movin parts in thing, thing make pretty, hold lot of pretty."
Nintendo, "You do what you gotta do, but I know what I'm doing. Been doing it for 20 years.. but of course that means nothing to you."
*Sony torques the psp and launches a umd in Nintendo's face*
Jesus what do you expect. It's not a portable device, it's an hot little brick that has battery life the length of a firecracker fuse. It's a device you play at home, after you just destroyed your TV from launching the controller through it.
Moving parts? Discs? Power? These things not the handhelds crave. Leave the juice and discs at home with your consoles.
That said I do own a psp, ahahahaha, but that doesn't mean I don't agree with the poor decisions Sony has made regarding their handheld platform. Gonna be gettin me a DS Lite soon so I can play new games on the go.
Pixels for my people,
Anticrawl
Reply
Reply
Reply
That is one of the most funniest things I've ever read.
Kudos to you Anticrawl.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Shaving 5-10 seconds off by clicking through faster? Real players would likely read the screens first and take longer.
I seriously hope you're kidding.
(btw, another thing I dislike about the star rating system on joystiq...Was your comment modded to 4 stars because it was funny or did someone really find that to be insightful? (sorry for the slashdot approximations~ heh)
--Hoffy, #18...
"This video was clearly edited. Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the PSP have a widescreen format? ((snip)) maybe whoever made this video had a special 4:3 formatted PSP. Come on Joystiq, you're better than that."
Of course it was edited... There is no timer or captions on the real game...or the Benny Hill song (which TOTALLY worked for this video). It is a very trivial matter to change the aspect ratio of captured video in just about any NLE software. This does nothing to ruin the authenticity of the clip and makes it a more universally accepted aspect ratio. (It was likely recorded by camcorder and then 'trimmed' to be full screen 4:3. "Joystiq you're better than that"....hmmm....how about Sony/THQ, you're better than that?
(with this said, I'm pretty happy with the load times on MG:Ac!d...the last game I bought (and kept) for my TWO PSPs...(why two? one permanently at 1.50 and one set aside for playing any forthcoming must-have games...which have yet to come along unfortunately.....which sucks, given my investment in them)
I eagerly await its sequal....MG:Ac!d 2...gimmicky glasses and all...bring it on damnit!)
Reply
I would be interested to know if anyone actually bought Finding Nemo for PS2, because you could probably blow through the entire second season of family guy waiting for the menu screen.
Reply
If that was the case then I would just buy a PSTwo with an LCD attachment and external battery.
Reply
Reply
it was when he was moving through the menus. you know. up to easy. no wait. down to hard.
i was trying (keyword there: trying) to be funny with saving the 5-10 seconds out of a 6 and a half minute video....
oh lord... and it was so long, benny hill had to start over! twice! heh. god that was funny. um. in a sad kinda way, of course.
m3mnoch.
Reply
I could've played myself into a sweat on my DS by the time that dumb game loaded.
Also that Benny hill music played like 5 times!!!
for portable gaming, NOTHING beats a DS.
If you want portable media players, screw the PSP, get yourself a, iriver or archos, or even a creative PMP.
Reply
Except that I'd have practically completed an entire Grand Prix in Mario Kart DS by the time this thing is done *loading*.
This is the difference between portable and home gaming. At home, you're sitting in front of your TV with a lovely beverage, you're relaxed, you're not going anywhere (literally). When you play a portable system, you may only have six minutes. You may have 10. Or 20. Or five. It's completely ridiculous for a game to take longer to *load* than the time you've got to play it.
If Sony and THQ don't understand this, then they don't understand the handheld market. (And that's a rhetorical "if", because I already know they don't.)
Reply
And here I thought I caught something that everyone else had completely missed. Oops.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
i feel sorry for anyone who spent money to play this peice of crap
Reply
Reply
Congratulations, you've found a shitty port that happens to have extra long load times. A game that came out that's sub-par? OH MY GOD SOMEONE CALL TEH CNN!
Welcome to the world of video games, for every decent game there are 100 crappy ones. I hate that the library of PSP games is painfully small just like everyone else, but it seems I'm the only person out there who enjoys the games I AM playing. Call me a fanboy if you will, but there just aren't that many games on the DS that appeal to me. I am, after all, over 10 years old.
Reply
Was that really neccessary? or were you trying to impress someone wit that comment?
Credibility = 0
Reply
I wasn't going to call you a fanboy...until you unleashed that little gem...
Reply
Now, this PSP game. That's ridiculous. Really takes the pick up and play out of what a portable device should be. Glad I opted for the DS...
Reply
Seriously, THQ- GET IT RIGHT THIS TIME. Do not give Xbox owners that abortion called RAW again. Give us the SAME GAME you give the Sony systems.
Reply
get faster all the time !
I remember the days of the commodore 64
Flight Simulator was the slowest....
Totally unplayable. Yet many tried.
Probably not as slow as the PSP but..... ha ha ha
Reply
Reply
Reply
Paul Gale
Reply