We've heard from a reliable source what
the next two Call of Duty titles will be about: one will focus on the Normandy Breakout
campaign in WWII, while the other moves into the modern age, taking the fight to Middle Eastern terrorists. Yikes!The big release news is that Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and the other WWII-themed game will be released for PC, PS2, PS3, Xbox, and Xbox 360--and they will be released only 3 months apart from one another. This would follow the pattern of releases for Call of Duty 2 on the PC and 360 and Call of Duty 2: Big Red One on current-gen consoles, only this time both would be released on both generations of hardware (minus the GameCube and Revolution).
What follows below are brief descriptions of each title, though Infinity Ward was explicitly fingered as the developer of Modern Warfare, while the as-yet untitled WWII game had no such designation. This would lead us to believe that "CoD 3" (or whatever that WWII game ends up being called) is being produced by Big Red One dev Treyarch. Whatever the case may be, just remember, folks: you heard about Call of Duty: Modern Warfare here first!
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, as we stated before, moves the Call of Duty franchise into the modern era, where you'll serve as part of the U.S. Army, U.S. Marines, and British S.A.S. to take on terrorists loyal to an aggressive Middle Eastern dictator. This war on terror must be fought all over the world--in locations as diverse as vessels at sea in the North Atlantic, secret terrorist cells in London, the urban streets of Eastern Europe, and, of course, the Middle East--as you try to stop a terrorist coalition from using its deadly chemical arsenal.
As a pilot in an Army attack helicopter, you'll fly over cratered urban environments--with rocket-propelled grenades to boot--before you rope down as part of a Marine platoon to engage in close-quarters combat in a very different (yet oddly familiar) sort of environment from Call of Duty 2. It's in this door-to-door implementation of battle that similarities to Rainbow Six 3 and Splinter Cell start to become apparent as you fight in squads, rappel down walls, and clear rooms with silenced guns, tear gas, flashbangs, and various specialized goggles. That doesn't prevent you from utilizing all manner of authentic modern weaponry, however, including automatic grenade launchers, mines, and machine guns.
Modern Warfare will also feature deformable environments, where you can kick down and blow up doors, or take it to another next level with destructible walls, roads, buildings, and bridges. You'll also be able to block doors with heavy obstacles like vehicles or furniture and block windows from grenades with a little chicken wire. But you're not just limited to shooting what's within your (fire)arm's reach: you can call in and laser-sight air strikes to knock out those pesky enemy tanks and sniper's nests, too. Now that's what friends are for.
The next Call of Duty World War II-based title will return gamers to the battlefields of Normandy as the Allies take on Nazi Germany to drive them out of France once and for all. This time around, American and British forces are joined by Canadian troops, Polish tanks, and French freedom fighters in a reenactment of the bloody Normandy Breakout campaign spearheaded during the summer of 1944. In the push to Paris, you'll get to choose how you approach each mission, free of menu screens and jarring non-interactive cut-scenes.
You'll also get to try your hand at a number of different roles in the Allied assault, including parachute drops and commando raids with the S.A.S. Powerful tanks will become part of your vehicular arsenal, as will jeeps and sidecar-enabled motorcycles--even in multiplayer mode. Bazookas and sticky bombs temper the advantage of armor, but at least you and a friend will be able to drive and shoot cooperatively in a trusty tank.
In addition to bringing the innovations of Call of Duty 2 along for the ride, the new WWII game will run on a new physics engine and context-sensitive battle-chatter system. Another system being added concerns Battlefield Actions where you'll push specific button combinations to pull off sprinting-to-cover, trap-disarming, and artillery-avoidance (aka dodging) maneuvers. (Tricky? Or gimmicky?)
If you have any further insights into this story, feel free to leave a comment below.











(Page 1) Reader Comments
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Great. Reinforcing yet again the war on an emotion, sanctified by a evil Christian puppet government against an evil Muslim one. And vaguely equating terror with xenophobia to perpetuate hate throughout the world. Go USA.
:
I'll stick with killing Nazis.
Reply
And modern warfare? That term is so vague it makes that psychic I call every Saturday night seem like the most reliable source of information I can get. They might as well make a "Jarhead" game where you play football in the desert and clean up the crap buckets and you see enemies, but you can't fire your gun. That would be great. Maybe the game will feature us roaming through caves in Pakistan, trying to find Osama. Maybe they could throw in some RPG elements and monsters, too.
Reply
THEN PEOPLE WOULD DIE!!!!
Reply
metroid prime 3 will showcase the FPS capabilities on the revolution.
Reply
Reply
yeah, this usa v arab terrorists "modern" warfare thing is getting a little old. i guess i can see how this would help spread more xenophobia towards middle eastern people(maybe a little?), but hey that's the current trend and most people here sure do love it!
how about generic terrorists like those from counter-strike?
Reply
I know there will be a swift response about how "nintendo fans don't care about first person shooters like COD because they are unoriginal" but these are the kinds of games that help sell consoles to the masses. You can't get by without them.
I just keep asking...if that revolution controller really is so innovative and revolutionary...then why again is a game like COD that would work so well with the controller...not coming to Revolution? Also on the list...RE5, Splinter Cell, Sonic the Hedgehog...I see a pattern. So far it looks like the Revolution is getting rejected even more so than the gamecube. I hate to see this happen, but I can't stand the idea of buying a revolution just to play a few exclusive titles like I did with gamecube. If it weren't for the RE series I never would have bought one.
Reply
Reply
Last year:
PS2 - 45%
Xbox - 19%
360 - 0%
Gamecube - 9%
PC - 17%
GBA/DS -8%
PSP - 2%
This year (so far):
PS2 - 39%
Xbox - 15%
360 - 10%
Gamecube - 7%
PC - 13%
GBA/DS - 7%
PSP - 9%
Reply
midlle eastern terrorists, A backdrop even more tired and used up than WW2 !
Come on, if you are so desperate to churn out generic
FPS after generic FPS , at least try to change to a war thats not been used a million times before!
It,s not like its few wars to choose from!
Reply
Do you suggest COD:Civil War? Or COD: American Revolution....
There would be no FPS aspects to these games...The tactics would be: Line up (like honorable gentlemen of war), shoot, get shot, if not shot--then move back and reload, move up again, aim and shoot...repeat.
Would you suggest COD WWI??
Tactics: Dig...hide...avoid death from above...don't poke your head outa the trench otherwise it gets shot off...Follow commanders' orders to get out of trench...run at other side, get mowed down--if not mowed down, run back and continue to hide...defend trench as necessary....
...yea...other wars translate into FPS really well.
Korean war you say?....who wants a FPS set in the "forgotten war"---makes for a forgotten game.
Reply
Reply
Nick
Reply
Reply
Reply
BUT I THINK COD2 WAS BY FAR THE BEST WW2 GAME TO DATE
BUT IF IW IS PLANNING ON MAKING ANOTHER FPS WW2 GAME
I WOULD LOVE TO PLAY AS A NAZI
I DONT RECALL ANY GAME LETTING YOU PLAY AS THE BAD GUYS
[Some inappropriate content here. Sorry, folks!]
ANYWAY I WOULD LOVE TO BE A GERMAN SOLDIER
BLITZKRIEGIN MY WAY INTO RUSSIA OR DESIMATING POLAND AND FRANCE
I MEAN COME ON
THATS SOME FUN STUFF
BUT THE TWO COD GAMES SOUND FANTASTIC
IM READY FOR A GOOD MODERN DAY SHOOTER
I HATE BF2 FOR XBOX I HATE MERCENARIES
IM HOPING GRAW WILL BE FANTASTIC
BUT IM WANTING THIS NEW COD
Reply
Reply
You're going to hurt yourself dude...seriously...stop looking into this so much.
As for this whole "xenophobic" stuff...it's perfectly natural to be a "little" scared about it.
Is it wrong to think that? Yea.
Is there a legit reason to think that? Yea but saying it is "arab" terrorists is bit wrong since it is more of an issue of "Islamic terrorists." However since Islam is centered around the Middle-East it is only logical that most of the Islamic terrorists are Arab.
If they do a CoD: Vietnam game and it turned out GOOD...then that would be a change since just about every Vietnam game that has come out has been complete crap...ESPECIALLY the Vietcong series.
Reply
Just to clarify...Call of Duty is made by Infinity Ward and PUBLISHED by Activision.
Medal of Honor is MADE by EA and PUBLISHED by EA.
Reply
How come nobody in the US understands not every muslim and/or middle eastern is not a terrorist / bad person ?
How come people say very horrible things about THE MOST SACRED PERSON in a religion which quarter of the world believes in ; and get away with that in this "very civilized" and open minded internet site / forum ?
As a muslim I am very offended about bad things written/spoken these days and to see it even in a gaming site, well... I think we have lost the basic qualities of being a human...
Reply
Medal of Honor is MADE by EA and PUBLISHED by EA."
Well, Jago... I thought about making that distinction between developing and publishing for the Call of Duty series, but seeing as how Activision has acquired both Infinity Ward and Treyarch (which absorbed Gray Matter Studios as well), the difference is mainly one between in-house studios and the (corporate) publishing parent. In the case of the Medal of Honor series, if we really want to be consistent, you might say that Medal of Honor Pacific Assault was developed by EALA and published by EA as a whole. Just to clarify some more... =)
Reply
Second,all these people who are "offended" about the way Mohammad was drawn seem to want their cake and eat it too b/c those SAME countries portray the Jews in a VERY negative light as well.
Third, if we were all a "civilized" world then we wouldn't really need to rely on some [flame] to tell us what to do.
Finally...
"How come terrorists = from middle east OR muslim ???
How come nobody in the US understands not every muslim and/or middle eastern is not a terrorist / bad person ?"
Not everyone beleives that...those who spew that crap out are completely ignorant...BUT...it is true that A LOT of the terrorist acts being done are by those of either Middle Eastern decent or are Islamic Extremists.
Reply
Yes, how come so many terrorists are from the Middle East or are Muslim?? Interesting, isn't it?
And why haven't Christians the world over rioted and protested over the poor characterizations of Jesus in recent Family Guy and South Park shows? Why is that?
huh...
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
WWII is also thoroughly worn out. Granted, COD had a huge hand in the WWII game industry, but the cards were played, the game's pretty much spent.
I think the problem with the COD series right now is that games are transitioning from single player to massively multiplayer, and the style of COD is very indidividual-centered...Everyone is tired of the freelance army soldier blasting his way through lines of Germans, and would rather be a part in a largely objective based team game such as BF2 (or for those still sucking the WWII tit, let me suggest DOD). The COD style is a dying breed.
Reply
Reply
And it hopefully won't run like the piece of crap BF2 does on my PC, but do you think we'll be able to play as the Middle Easterners online like we can play as Germans online in the original game(s)?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Anyone remember the piss christ incident? Well christian did protest over it, the difference here is the politicial situation there and plus cartoon werent even comical just plain offensive, where folks in the mid-east and muslims in general are in the light. And one more thing, Mohammed has already been in southpark actually and there was a French cartoon of Mohammed as well, but none of did nothing these cartoon were just offensive and were nothing funny as south park.
Reply
Reply
The way the PC users have been treated by ACT and IW is nothing short of criminal.
COD2 was a rushed un-finshed pile is poop, it should have stayed on the (thankyou Microsoft we love you kiss kiss kiss X-box360) where it belongs.
Many PC users have given up on COD2 and most will never purchase an IW game again.
Fool me once shame on me, Fool me twice-bugger off.
Reply
By rioting, burning buildings, and killing people, all the participating muslim community is doing is turning that cartoon into truth. The cartoon portrayed the prophet mohammed with a bomb as a turbin on his head, symbolizing that the muslim community supports destruction, and violence. What do they do in response to this cartoon? Instead of staging a peaceful protest, or peacefully asking the paper to remove it to send a different, more positive message for there religion...they riot, kill people, and burn buildings??? All this essentially, makes the cartoon look true. I understand that muslims are very dedicated to there religion, and if that is the case, then why did they not stop and think to make a positive statement? Rather than just storm the streets and burn buildings to the ground?
From what I have obtained from speaking with my Islamic friends, here in the states...for every muslim that is over in europe and the middle east being violent, there is another muslim that is peacefully speaking about how these people are making a bad reputation for there religion.
Christians get made fun of and insulted every day in America by the media and entertainment industry. Democrats preech all day about how muslims and gays should be treated with equal rights, but at the same time they shun the ideas and beliefs of christianity, essentially mocking them. You don't see any christians storming the streets burning down buildings. That doesn't mean they aren't "dedicated" if dedicated means killing people, and burning down buildings over a cartoon that we disagree with, then I guess they aren't. But true dedication would have been using your brain and thinking out proper action to take that wouldn't hurt the reputation of a religion that is already viewed around the world as being related with terrorism. All they did by rioting was make matters worse for themselves.
I don't mean to sound like a conservative jackass, because I'm not but this is just my opinion.
Which brings me to say. THIS IS JUST A GAME! In the same manner that the cartoon was just a cartoon. It's not like the developer's were saying...hmmm...how can we mock and make fun of the muslims? I know! We'll make a game in which they are terrorists! Hardly the case. The problem with people today is that things have gotten so out of hand that I couldn't even make a damn cookie and sell it on the street without offending someone because they worship chocolate chips and have different beliefs or values. Somebody makes a game connecting muslims with terrorism...what does that make them? All the sudden everyones saying "that's racist...your discriminating if you support that" Give me a break. Don't like it, don't fucking buy it, but don't sit there and tell me what I can and can't sell just because YOU not ME don't agree with it. Welcome to America.
Reply
Reply
Well, as far as I know, peaceful protests and complaints were lodged by local Muslims when the cartoons were first released, but a rebuff of ambassadors from Muslim countries by the Danish premier got international relations off on the wrong foot after that. From there, things apparently snowballed as certain activists took their case to the Middle East. Here's one foreign source concerning the incident:
http://english.pravda.ru/news/world/21-02-2006/76288-0
Regardless of whose side you fall on over this controversy, please note that this topic is really going off on an off-topic tangent. Please try to avoid hasty and inflammatory responses to it.
Reply
Reply
You need to stop [flame].
There is evil in the world and as far as I am concerned and as history has demonstrated, the USA, regardless of how unpopular, has always come to the aid of those in need.
PS. If you give me the "it's all for oil" crap you really are [flame]. Canada and Mexico could supply the equivalent amount of oil that the US gets from the Middle East and are a heck of a lot more stable. No religious fanaticism, no beheadings, no suicide bombers who were brainwashed by evil Mulas.
Give us a break and go play Pong.
Rant over.
Reply
Reply
How long have you been using the internet now? You do realize that forums are NOTORIOUS for spreading wrong information right? It's like playing the old game of "telephone."
Reply
Reply
Reply
As far as the "WWII games are old" and "everyone is doing modern shooter" arguments, what else would you suggest? I figure their are 3 options in any semi-realistic war games (if you exclude any moronic sci-fi stuff): past, present, and future. I don't want to be FPSing as a knight, and i don't want lasers and hovercrafts. Eric made a good point about other, recent wars being difficult to translate into exciting and fun games. I for one am not interested in playing "Grenada; The Biggest Little War That Was". If anyone has any suggestions on another realistic, fun war setting for an FPS in the vein of CoD, i am all ears.
Finally, the whole "why's it gotta be terrorists?" thing. At the moment, Terrorists are currently our only legitimate, shooting war enemy. They are socially acceptable as an enemy as all of the Western world has been impacted by terrorism in some way. Any other enemy would either be a joke (US v Luxemburg, battle royale!) or inappropriate politically/socially. How many people would be outraged at a game featuring the US invading Canada, or something similair? Granted, not all terrorists are Muslim/Arabic/etc, and not all Muslims/Arabs are terrorists. But the recent experience of the world makes Middle Eastern terrorists identifiable and more than acceptable as enemies.
All in all I will be anxiously awaiting the release of any CoD sequel. As long as IW takes its time and makes these ones right (still waiting on that damn patch), they have GREAT potential.
Reply
Reply
Wonder if modern warfare will be able to give BF2 a run for its money. Or BF3 maybe by that time.
Reply