| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (9)

Posted: Mar 9th 2006 12:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
1. That is the ESRBs fault. They do advertise, but the ads are so bad and generic that they go by unnoticed.

2. Good idea, there are benefits from playing videogames, the trick is to show that these benefits outweigh or at least counteract the negatives that are known to exist.

3. Unfortunately this is subjective. There is no "proof" that video games as a whole are good. There will always be studies that show that everything is bad for you without moderation.

4. Irrelevant. Videogames have been around for several decades at this point, it is no longer a "new" media.

5. Good one. Unfortunately the trend these days is to legislate morality, rather than taking personal responsibility. Parents would prefer to let the nanny state do their parenting for them.

6. The problem is that most people think videogames are played by kids. The public needs to be made aware of the fact that the average videogame player is not a child or teenager, but an adult age 25-30.

7. Awesome.

8. Urg. I abhor lobbying, and think corporations should not be able to give money to political parties. But sometimes you have to play the game.

9. But is there an outlet for these spokespersons? Where would they preach that would reach the people who are against gaming?

10. Good idea. Even showing that most of the best selling titles have been non-violent (other than GTA), would help.

11. I don't think the problem is that 20% are rated M, but that people think 95% of the players are children. Many movies are aimed at adults, why not games?

12. I make video-games and am proud of it! Did that help? No? Crap. I'm still proud.
Reply

Posted: Mar 9th 2006 12:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"I don't think that videogames have cornered the entertainment market on sex and violence by a long shot."

As they shouldn't, dammit. Games are about fun, not pixelated porn and blood. Only cowards use these things to sell their products. And don't give me no "but it's art!" crap either.
Reply

Posted: Mar 9th 2006 12:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Mark my word, (even though I live in Canada), I think you will eventually see Hillary Clinton as the FIRST FEMALE PRESIDENT OF THE USA....

Remember I said that... (hey, Britain had Margaret Thatcher years ago, same with other countries)...

Its all about who you know....

Just my .02..
Reply

Posted: Mar 9th 2006 1:22PM copa said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow. Out of 12 points, only #10 has anything to do with the quality of the product you are putting out.

Guess what? If you put out quality entertainment that a broad cross-section of people can enjoy, that does more than anything to deflate the ban-videogames movement.

Marketing people suck.
Reply

Posted: Mar 9th 2006 1:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Last time somebody tried getting me into a 12 step program it ended up being a really depressing religious cult.
Never again.

This is why I hate all politicians weather they be on the right or the left. Because they all waste time debating bs that doesn't really effect anybody, while there's crazy stuff going on that almost everybody (except for the offenders) agrees needs to change (like child abuse).

I still vote, but I make it a point to never vote for a Democrat or Republican; y'know, somebody who'll never win.
Reply

Posted: Mar 9th 2006 2:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
8- Lobby
This is probably the most usefull thing on this list for the game makers can do.
The d-bags in the government (who let's face it should only be paid the score of their IQs) don't really care about the wellbeing of the children. Why should they, kids don't vote or give them money. And the only thing they want more than your vote is your money.

If you can afford to have a particularly evil lobbyist shovel tons of money over to these idiots, please do. It's the only way you'll get them off our backs.
Reply

Posted: Mar 9th 2006 4:29PM Slurms MacKenzie said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
#3, I'm confused... Which other countries had Margaret Thatcher?
Reply

Posted: Mar 9th 2006 4:34PM jp007 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The only thing that is "in danger" in the videogames industry is the ability of companies like EA to continue making huge profits from crappy unspired games, sequals sequals sequals, and ripoff 50 dollar sports roster updates.
Gaming is not in danger, just their worthless business models.
Reply

Posted: Mar 9th 2006 5:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What the hell is the point of conducting research to find out something this marketer already knows? (point 3) Why not just give up on science and let marketers find out what is best for everyone?
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW