| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (12)

Posted: Mar 14th 2006 1:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, I guess I'm one of the 5. Lately, I've been playing more World of Warcraft than trying to find a new job. =X

(portfolio and resume on my site)

Posted: Mar 14th 2006 1:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hmm. All the Mac heads I know (and there are alot of us because over the years I've converted all my friends) are not that in to gaming on their Mac. If they were, they have/would have (like me) a gaming PC.

If I want to game, since swearing off all MMORPGs, then I use my consoles.

Nothing beats sitting on your couch and gaming. I think if I ever got back into to PC gaming, I would go ahead and hook my gaming PC to my TV, and use my Mac's wireless mouse and keyboard.

Posted: Mar 14th 2006 1:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
closer code base? the swop to intel isn't going to affect gaming, or pretty much anything other than with a bit of hacking an intel mac can run Windows.

anyways. I'm a 'hardcore' gamer (somebody who has a collection of rare games, collects only the best etc, at least the way I see it) and I'm a mac user. Primarily have a mac because I don't want games to interfere with uni work, and vice versa.

Posted: Mar 14th 2006 1:51PM chrisgrant said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Jay:
au contraire, some major Mac game developers expounded on this pre-switch, saying things like, "this actually makes the job of moving games to the Mac easier...you're now dealing with moving code to Mac frameworks and not to an otherwise alien architecture."

Read more here:
http://www.insidemacgames.com/features/view.php?ID=355

Posted: Mar 14th 2006 1:52PM ZeroCorpse said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And before anyone gripes about the Intel Mac Mini's integrated graphics, let me dispel your FUD by saying it does play games quite well, especially the Universal Binaries, and that the integrated Intel chipset is far better than the 9200 in the previous Mac Mini, or the GeForce GO chips in some of the G4 PowerBooks/iBooks.

No, it's not as spiffy as a 6800, but it's certainly not a clunky chipset. Most games run well on the Core Duo with 1GB of RAM.

Now, if you're trying to play DOOM 3 on a Core Solo with 512MB of RAM, then you're an idiot and of course it won't work well. But jump that Mac Mini up to the Core Duo with 2GB of RAM and run the Doom 3 Universal Binary, and WHOOSH! You've got a nice game on!

Most Mac users aren't using their Macs for hardcore gaming, though. If I want super-fast frame rates and all the bells and whistles, I'll switch over to my Xbox 360 and play games that make the best-of-the-best in PC gaming look slow and ugly by comparison.

Mac Mini + XBox 360 = Perfect system.

Posted: Mar 14th 2006 2:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is great.
I would've gotten a mac a long time ago if they had the capability for games.
It looks like my next one just might be a mac after all.

Posted: Mar 14th 2006 6:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So b/c old games will be able to play a new Mac is enough reason to pay for an overprice computer to play games that run better on a PC...riiiiiiiiiiiight.

Posted: Mar 14th 2006 6:52PM ZeroCorpse said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And this isn't even considering WINE and what it could possibly do for the OSx86 systems.

Developers-- And I don't mean companies that port games, but first-party developers-- will be more likely to put new games on the Intel Macs, or make a dual disc for Win/Mac like Blizzard has been doing SINCE THEY STARTED MAKING GAMES. You know why World of Warcraft is so big and profitable and killing Evercrack? Mac users can buy the SAME DISCS from their local store and play online with the PC users. Blizzard was even on top of it when the need for a Universal Binary came along.

EA, Atari, Eidos, and all the other companies would be wise to look at Blizzard's model. Release games that work on Windows or Mac, and watch MORE PEOPLE buy your games and more people buying Macs.

Posted: Mar 14th 2006 7:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Poor, poor Jago.

Posted: Mar 14th 2006 8:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
what?

Posted: Mar 15th 2006 12:06AM Serious Kriss said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"If I want super-fast frame rates and all the bells and whistles, I'll switch over to my Xbox 360 and play games that make the best-of-the-best in PC gaming look slow and ugly by comparison."

Consoles are not a substitute to PC when it comes to games. Their libraries are just too different.
And I've yet to see any 360 game that makes games like FEAR seem "slow and ugly". Come to think of it, most games that came for both the PC and the 360 look better on a gaming PC...

Posted: Mar 15th 2006 1:10AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well in all honesty...CoD2 runs smoother on the 360 compared to a beefy PC (i.e. AMD Dual Core, 2GB ram, SLI Geforce 7800GT cards 256MB

Featured Stories

Image

Now Playing: May 21-27, 2012

Posted on May 21st 2012 2:50PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW