| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (45)

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 3:12AM epobirs said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I guess that price makes it the first Xbox 360 bargain title. It'll be interesting to see how this works out. Also interesting to see this from a outfit normally thought of as a big budget megaseller.
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 3:12AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't think people buy Rockstar's games just because they are Rockstar. The Grand Theft Auto series are some of the most buggy games to ever become popular, but thats not to say that the programmers at Rockstar aren't badasses. I don't think Rockstar would take a financial risk like this unless they truely believed they had something great. I can't wait to play.
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 3:15AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Haha this is great. Could be a cool game.

Anyway this would be a great(!!) revolution port. Please R* make this a revo game. Trust me it would sell.
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 3:58AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree with FAN.

This would totaly rock on the revolution's controller.

(cant wait for baseball games on that thing)
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 4:02AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Ea we are looking at you"

Need to look at 2K sports as well. They are just as silly and easily achieved.

At least EA has one sports game where the achievements are hard, and that is Tiger Woods.

Cant say the same for 2K.

I hope Rockstar has something cool for this planned. I wonder what they will be.
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 4:25AM epobirs said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Patsy: "I'm not upset about the fake drugs. I'm just disturbed that I wasn't high and had fun playing ping-pong."

/paraphrasing from Ab Fab.
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 4:52AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
the problem is this is the sort of game that would do really well in asia, but the thing is consoles tend not to do well in Asia outside of Japan. i don't know...i'm sure it's a fantastic game but i don't know if it's going to be the success they're hoping for.
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 4:57AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I really don't understand why there's been so much 'surprise' about this title, like it's some completely illogical move.

Maybe in a world where games like Pong, Super Tennis, Smash Tennis, Virtua Tennis haven't proved to be some of the most enjoyable games ever made. But not here.
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 5:00AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If it's half as good as Top Spin, it'll rule.
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 7:11AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
thats a nice revolution title
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 7:13AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm looking forward to see how something like this would look on Revolution, but probably not like how most fanboys see it. At most, I'd expect it to succeed if they kept it to just simple control, like using the controller to move the paddle into position, and then still pressing a button to swing. Anything else, and it will sound as stupid as all those suggestions of using the controller to swing a sword in zelda.
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 7:23AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Maybe in a world where games like Pong, Super Tennis, Smash Tennis, Virtua Tennis haven't proved to be some of the most enjoyable games ever made."

All of which were TENNIS games. Not ping-pong ("pong" could obviously be argued, but it was called that because the graphics weren't advanced enough to really simulate real tennis).

I mean you may as well justify the existence of a miniature golf title by pointing out the popularity of Tiger Woods, or an Arena Football game by pointing out the popularity of Madden. It just ain't the same thing.

That's not to say a ping pong game couldn't be fun. They're sure popular enough in Japan, where there are dozens of them (though even the Japanese aren't usually big enough suckers to pay full price - most of them are budget titles). The few that have been released here have bombed in the marketplace, though. Rockstar's acting as if they've got the market cornered on ping pong; the reason why some of us think they're crazy is that there's just not much of a market there to corner.
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 7:36AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, I couldn't decide whether to laugh or feel excited during that overview of the game o_O I think I should be excited, and I guess I sort of am, but I have one major problem. I love Ping-Pong, I play every day, I own a table and it's easily accessible on my porch. My parent's join in on a game quite frequently. This game might be realistic and entertaining, but I just don't see any of us favoring the game over the real version o_O Since I would personally rather play on my porch in a real game, and I'm having trouble convincing my parents to even try the Revolution, I don't see this being a good family-time thing o_O Somebody want to point out a real advantage in playing the game versus the real thing, for those who own a ping-pong table? Seems to me that as an avid Ping-Pong player, I'd be their key target, but I just don't care that much o_O
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 7:41AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"All of which were TENNIS games. Not ping-pong ("pong" could obviously be argued"

There is very little difference between the two, especially in the 16-bit era of Tennis simulations. Table Tennis is very much just Tennis on speed. And for that reason, a Table Tennis game is an absolute no-brainer in my book. Hence why i don't get the surprised reaction.
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 8:32AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's clearly the greatest satire ever. After all the whinging about GTA/Manhunt, it's a stark reference to Pong, a time when computer games were simple and unthreatening. Lets see if JT has anything to say about this.
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 8:39AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You know Jack-ass Thompson will slip in some sort of dillusional rendition as to how table tennis is linked to the devil.

(lets just hope they dont add a mod where you bend over the female players and have them shoot the balls out their ....... you get the idea)
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 8:47AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh Cut price eh? Me thinks ill get this then, i wouldnt of if it was selling for £49.99 like so many other 360 games...
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 9:09AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Better not add in more insults. We might attract the ire of Jack Thompson. We wouldn't want that to happen, now would we?

Oh, [i]wait[/i].
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 9:22AM KTXL said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sounds great- This'll be sitting right next to Top spin 2 on my shelf.

Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 9:59AM Cuddlefish said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hey Jeff, $39.99 is a budget priced title on the 360. That's $20 cheaper than most games. I was happy that Top Spin 2 released at $39.99 also.
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 10:06AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
2 things this game's got to have:

1- Hot paddle mod.

2-Hot Wynona Serve
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 10:10AM Player1 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What's with all the revolution fanbois? You know they sell a game system at Best Buy on the bottom rack that has games with bowling ball or tennis racket controllers. I bet it's the best system ever! Oh wait, it doesn't say Nintendo on it. Now go have a romantic evening with your powerglove, this is a 360 title.

I agree that all the haters out there aren't down with Virtua Tennis and don't see the real potential here. As long as the controls aren't as bad as trying to shoot in GTA, this game should rock.
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 10:19AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Didnt you know Player1?

Nintendo invented the wheel!

:snicker:
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 10:36AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have to agree, despite the fact that this is a 360 exclusive title, why cant it be done as well if not better on the 360? Because the controller isnt standard?!?!? Im confused. What's to stop MS or Sony from releasing their own versions. ESPECIALLY since they all have a version of it in development now as a peripheral. But its not standard you say? Well neither was it for gamecube, however the rev remote will reportly work with gamecube games? How? the same way they will do it with SOny and MS. Send a patch down through the network to allow most if not all games to be compatible with the add-on. MS already forces every game on the 360 to be live-aware. Meaning if you plug in this peripherial its possible to automatically download the patch for whatever game you are playing. I have a good question. How many of the Ninty fans have their cube hooked up for online play? Is that why you dont like the other consoles. Because they think its good to play together? Anyway as far as the Revo is concerned I dont see what besides its 1st party offerings the revo offers that the others dont. Only based on the fact that both Ms and Sony screw up the controller peripherial can I see the revo being the number one console worldwide. Not because people prefer it but be cause its cheap and unique and they usually have a 360 or Ps3 as their main and the revo as an additive or "the kids console"
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 11:02AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"however the rev remote will reportly work with gamecube games? "

It will work with Twilight Princess. Nothing else.
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 11:35AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I was thinking this was a really bad move on Rockstar's part, but after the realizing that they're pulling the "accesibility card" it makes perfect sense. Rockstar, being Take-Two's sugar daddy, has failed to bring home the bacon due to scandals and politicians (and sex workers?) inflated self importance. They have a good thing going with this near sure bet. Early Xbox360 adopters are sure to buy this title, and many are sure to play and recommend it, especially at the price point. It's the same reason CostCo is doing so well: volume is just as viable for returned revenue as is high markup, if not possibly more so.
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 11:40AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
it cant be much worse than gta
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 11:47AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ping Pong is a great game. Now, this might sound silly, but depending on reviews when it's released. I'm honestly thinking of buying a 360 just for this game. Well, that and Halo next year...

Viva virtual Ping Pong!
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 12:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sounds like an interesting game -- yeah, I'm a ping pong fan, so I'm definitely lookin' forward to giving this a spin. =)
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 1:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This game is going to be utterly pointless and dull without the Revolution controller.

Oh and take note of WHICH development studio are making this. Not Rockstar North and Leeds who make the GTA games. the guys who make this and GTA are 2 completely separate entities bound together only by the studio name.
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 1:21PM easo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
RP
"It will work with Twilight Princess. Nothing else."
This is from ign writing about a hands on test with the first revolution dev kits:
These preliminary kits include only a wired Revolution controller, a wired nunchuck attachment and a wired motion bar, which some studios have labeled the "wand." So the obvious question is, how can developers possibly hope to test any of this gear out? The answer is simple: the controller and its attachments plug into existing GameCube development hardware.

"The wired Revolution controller is inserted into a control socket on the GameCube hardware. The nunchuck unit connects to the freehand-style controller via a makeshift Ethernet cable. And the so-called wand plugs into a Memory Pak slot on the GCN development hardware. A software solution undoubtedly resolves any initial compatibility issues. Studios have been told by Nintendo to experiment from there."
This clearly indicates that only a software upgrade is needed to play gamecube games with the free style.
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 1:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
ozymandias, that does not indicate that you will be able to play GC games with the Revolution controller.
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 1:49PM Don Jose said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
All I have to say (in this increasingly convoluted forum) is that:

a). I own a ping pong table. (aluminum: it's sweet!);
b). I have owned every Nintendo console ever; and,
c). until I get some hard details on the Rev Shell, I'm way more interested in my 360 and my ping pong table than I am in the Revolution.
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 2:15PM Player1 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"This game is going to be utterly pointless and dull without the Revolution controller."

By that same logic:
-all FPS games would be utterly pointless without a gun controller
-all football games pointless without football controller
-all fighting games pointless without full body controllers
-all Mario games pointless without mushroom controller
-etc, etc.
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 2:19PM Jackal888 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Table Tennis needed a game like this. Have you ever watcheda Olympic Table Tennis match?Have you ever seen Forrest Gump the movie? If you have you will know its not just ping-pong. It can be an intense fast paced game where physics,strategy and speed are paramount.I think this game will be great and do not know whay these Nintendo fans are already trying to port it to the Rev. This game was made for the XBOX360 for a reason.The processors will be working hard to get all the game physics exact and speedy for real-time online play with voice chat maybe spectators. I do not think a slower processor (Revolution)could handle it. Also the wand controller would be too slow or not accurate enough to handle Table Tennis.
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 2:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"This game is going to be utterly pointless and dull without the Revolution controller."

Shake the crime stick, fanboy.
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 2:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"ozymandias, that does not indicate that you will be able to play GC games with the Revolution controller."

No but it proves that the most "next gen" feature of the revolution is easily transferable to "current and past gen" hardware via software only. Nintendo will not make all games or even most games compatible with the cube ONLY because what reason would consumers have to actually purchase a revolution? If the Revo in fact is not getting advanced gpu features such as pixel shader 3.0 as was suggested. The Revo will be far behind the curb in graphical advances. Im not anti-nintendo, but nothing about it appears to be unique other than the 1st party games. I have nothing against nintendo but I'm still gonna call a spade a spade. As for the Ping-Pong game... Do i think the Ps3 could run it? Sure with tweaks of course. It depends on how the AI and physics code is written. If its heavily interger and branch dependant, the PS3 would struggle with this title. Ironically it could also possible blow it out of the water if the code is highly parrallel and SP dependant. Hard to tell without seeing the game in action or hands on.
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 2:27PM ill trooper said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
A big mistake here is that people think they already need to be a ping-pong fan to enjoy this game... If the control and speed we keep hearing about hold-up through the final stages of preparing this game (as well as the serving issues you've brought up), I predict it will make people like it just by sheer enjoyable gameplay and competition.

I'm not a spy but I like Spliter Cell; my friends love Madden but they don't play football in the park, so I call BS on the 'I really love the real game, but I'm not interested at all' theory - it's the other way around - a video game is far easier to pick up and try, then fall in love with than actually doing what's represented on screen. Nobody expected Geometry Wars to be as fun as it is; it simply happens.

By the way, Rockstar STILL makes GTA, it's not like that's stopping. Look at the diversity of the titles EA publishes; Rockstar is offering up something a little off-beat from their norm as well.
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 3:12PM docevil said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
#29
"This game is going to be utterly pointless and dull without the Revolution controller."

I agree that this game would be interesting to play with the rev controllers but to say 'utterly pointless and dull' -without using- the rev controller is... well, frankly, it's dumb.

#29 again
"Oh and take note of WHICH development studio are making this. Not Rockstar North and Leeds who make the GTA games. the guys who make this and GTA are 2 completely separate entities bound together only by the studio name."

Ok, put this title in the hands of the gta team instead and add some features like having to beat fans in the audience until they drop a paddle which you then use to play the game. Of course, this would also be 'utterly pointless and dull' without the rev controller.

Come on. How many companies have multiple projects handled by different teams in different geographies?

Here we have a company that is breaking free of the pattern of sequels to publish a fresh, new exclusive ip. They are taking a risk. Isn't that what we all want regardless of the platform, that the developers will take some risks on that platform? I personally hope that this title is a spectacular success.
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 3:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
In response to Player1 who mentioned the Xavix system, its really cool. If they ported this to the Revolution, it would be just like the Xavix Tennis Game (we sold it at Radioshack, and it was extremely addicting). It will probably go bankrupt now that Nintendo is taking their idea with the controller, but it was so much fun!
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 4:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I just think that if a company like Rockstar is going to produce and release a game like this, it has to be good. And addictive. Looking forward to trying it out soon. Nice review, Joystiq.
Reply

Posted: Apr 3rd 2006 8:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I just think that a characted modeled after Tom Hanks would be the best thing in a game like this.
Reply

Posted: Apr 4th 2006 2:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's good to see ideas like this again. When video games were new, simple 1on1 games were common because it was difficult, technically, to do anything more complex. But that didn't mean they weren't fun.
Reply

Posted: Apr 11th 2006 9:46AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Let me guess, you can throw the paddles at your opponent and decapitate them. (That would be great)
Reply

Posted: Apr 22nd 2006 10:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You can tell from the screenshot that this will be an INTENSE game...

:p
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW