| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (11)

Posted: Apr 4th 2006 6:15PM nizzy1115 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
My vote: Microsoft NOT Guilty

Posted: Apr 4th 2006 6:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
My Vote: Not guilty like Kobe, MJ and OJ

Posted: Apr 4th 2006 6:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Of course not guilty... This patents... Soon we can't go to restroom without patent. Delirium of course, but helps thinking

Posted: Apr 4th 2006 6:41PM nizzy1115 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
anyone remember a month ago with the stupid blueberry patent infringment...i mean blackberry...its the same thing here

Posted: Apr 4th 2006 6:43PM spasewalkr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
saying that ms is infringing copyright for using MPEG2 is like saying that burger king is infringing on mcdonalds because they stole the hamburger

Posted: Apr 4th 2006 7:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Lucent has a history sueing to make money. MS will most likely win or settle it out of courts like what they did with emerson. I always though MS owned MPEG or atleast popularized it.

Posted: Apr 4th 2006 8:49PM tucker973 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think some of you are a bit confused over copyright violation and patent infringement. The MPEG-2 format is made up of over 600 patents that handle the way audio and video is encoded and decoded. Lucent owns some of those patents, and if Microsoft did not properly license the technology then they are, in fact, at fault.

As the poster Adams Briscoe points out, companies as big as MS and Lucent go through this all the time. Most likely this will be settled out of court and MS will pay Lucent the appropriate licensing fees.

Copyright violation has absolutely nothing to do with this. Think, read, understand before you speak. I know we're all fanboys here, but this will never have any effect on any of us. And let's be honest, this isn't the first time MS has been accused of doing things, err, improperly. They can handle it.

Posted: Apr 4th 2006 8:51PM djphatjive said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I always thought the MPEG Group owned the rights to MPEG tech? weird!

http://www.chiariglione.org/mpeg/

Posted: Apr 5th 2006 2:50PM tucker973 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
djphatjive, and from that site, if you bother to read:
"5.1 Organisations wishing to license technology included in MPEG specifications can find contact information relating to organisations which have made a Patent Statement and Licensing Declaration.

5.2 Various MPEG standards have benefited from the existence of patent pools where organisations wishing to license technology included in such standards can negotiate a single license covering all the essential patents identified by those organizations which administer the patent pools."

i.e. the Motion Pictures Expert Group maintains, approves and oversees the standards; but the individual organizations who created the various technologies used in the standards own the patents to those technologies.

http://www.chiariglione.org/mpeg/patents.htm

Posted: Apr 5th 2006 5:20PM spasewalkr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
all that legal stuff still doesnt make the intent of the suit decent. its still a load of bullshit

Posted: Apr 5th 2006 6:32PM djphatjive said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I never said I read it. I said, I always thought they owned it.

Jeeeez!!!!!

Besides, you would think being microsoft, they already have the rights to use it anyway, being that they have rights to use it in everything else they make.


Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW