| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (88)

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 11:37AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Modders "hard at work" to create this? Gimme a break, Joystiq. The files for this are INCLUDED with the game. Bethesda included the bare skin textures and meshes. All you have to do is extract the files and rename a couple.
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 11:43AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Riiight. He's fighting the man, by showing us lizard-women nipples. Gotcha. And since he's fighting the man, he's probably hard at work at coding that genitalia package for both sexes, right? Suuuuure he is.

Dude, if you want teh B00biesz, fine. But don't kid yourself. Yeesh.
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 11:44AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
yeah joystiq. how in the hell did you forget to include that HUGE tidbit of info?

here's the previous stuff in the article joystiq conveniently left out.

"In the process of trying to create a nude skin for Oblivion, I found Bethesda had already done all the work for me. They just covered it up with underwear afterwards. (At least in my version -- I know sometimes European versions are different, as those cultures accept the human body better.)

Bethesda's skins/models don't really look amazing once they're actually in the game, though... I'm sure someone will make better ones sooner or later. I'll be looking forward to it too."

thats great journalism.
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 11:48AM Inquisitor Glokta said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Unsightly, green-skinned, non-humans and the like demonstrating pixelated mammary glands as a political statement?

Ever think that maybe the creators of the game chose to clothe them because a topless character didn't make sense in the environment they created and not because of pressure from some unidentifiable political power?

I'd love to hear from the mouth of a developer if it truly was "government/society/whatever forcing companies to protect our innocent population from seeing those evil dirty things" that prompted them to render the characters the way the did.
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 11:52AM chrisgrant said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Umm, dudes, it's sort of a joke. The first mod is topless models.

In my upcoming 4000pg book detailing the history of this mod, I go into much greater detail about the technical process used by said modders. In this post, I figured you could click your mouse, read the post, and see for yourself.

Thanks for trolling though. It's always appreciated. :)
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 11:59AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It is HARDLY the first mod. There are already a couple of hundred mods available, and this one was in no way the first.

Maybe just the first you decided to report.
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 12:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This guy is much better at mods than he is at actually playing the game... watch the video.
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 12:06PM chrisgrant said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Fair enough Tim... how about an "early mod" instead of the declarative "first" mod?
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 12:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
I would like to see full on hardcore sex. It should contain a minigame to control the action and it should use wasd or mouse movement to pull of cool moves.

Whats the big deal? If you dont like it dont download it. Personally i would find it hilarious.
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 12:17PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
This is worse than the Hot Coffee mod. I am fuming mad about this travesty. Why won't people think of the children? This game should have been rated Adult Only and only sold in stores where kids can't get in.

I'm drafting up a letter of complaint about this right now for my congressman and I suggest the rest of you do the same unless you want people to think seeing the naked body is good. Next thing you know kids will think women should walk around topless, and believe their female friends/wives/sisters/mothers should become strippers and prostitutes to satisfy their lustful urges. We wear clothing because our bodies are sinful twisted versions of Gods perfect image, just seeing a naked body can corrupt a person so badly that they will become an abomination. Only though legislature and additional laws can we protect ourselves from weakness.

I am also starting up a campaign to require all pets to be clothed while in public. Having naked animals gives the impression that it is ok to see sexual organs, but we all know that many studies have proven that seeing a naked animal is the first step into wanting to see people naked and only one step away from complete chaos. Every single rapist had seen a naked animal at one point in their lives, and therefore we can easily conclude that this is the reason they are driven to treat women as sexual objects, not people.

Please, think of the children.
Reply

Posted: Apr 20th 2009 5:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This message is directed towards Art Guy, a Christian who is commenting first and foremost on a pagan game “Oblivion”, yet he has problems with nudity in the game? Why would a Christian talk in behalf of a pagan game when in the bible paganism is a sin? I think art guy is a bible salesman who is only writing on this blog only to propagate his own brand of fascism, only he is to ignorant to recall the fact that Adam and Eve went against gods will by realizing their nakedness, going against gods will by “clothing themselves” (written in the chapter of Genesis/meaning beginning). Secondly, Oblivion is appropriately rated do to the fact that the patches are being created from separate entities than the creators of the game. The nudity patches are being created by hackers not Bethesda SOFTWORKS company. Thirdly, these nude patches can’t be attained by children as all pages require an age consent and require a fee for download.
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 12:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Someone point out to me WHY a person would want to install this mod? I know that the article says not to bash on the author for being sophomoric, but unless you have a nudity fetish, why on Earth would you install this thing? Granted there are some big cultural differences between America and Europe and how we view women's breasts, but how would this enhance a game experience? I can't even think of an environment in the game where I would expect to see topless women running around. What IS the point of this mod other than a pornographic one for men who like women's breasts? There are plenty of other mods that actually bring some value to the game, like the portable bed roll, I love that mod.
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 12:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hey, its just back to the old days. Elder Scrolls 2: Daggerfall, the female characters minus shirts were already topless in the character view screen.
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 12:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Who in the hell wants to see boobies on a bobcat-headed humanoid? And how in the hell is this a protest against an oppressive society? If you REALLY want to change an oppressive society's laws or norms, organize a movement or write a frickin' letter to a Congressman. Exposing pixellated boobies on a video game is only going to make you look like a lonely freak who needs real social interaction. And if you really want to make a statement, why not make everyone nude in the videogame, including men?
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 12:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
To be fair, some of the most popular types of small mods for Morrowind were clothing add-ons. The Metal Queen Boutique and Slof's Goth Shop added clothing that depended on the Better Bodies mod, as they featured unusual collars and hems, and occasionally plunging necklines. You could make the argument that removing the underwear meshes from Oblivion makes these types of mods possible, as the underwear might conflict with the look and the functionality of the clothing objects.

But let's not kid ourselves. Let us also not be judgemental, and allow gamers to be entertained in whatever manner they see fit. If that happens to include exposed breasts, then fine. Individual freedom should be exercised when available.
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 12:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
#12 "Who in the hell wants to see boobies on a bobcat-headed humanoid?"

Ummm...Cheetara...Hello!? lol
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 12:52PM StalkerSteve said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You guys aren't seeing the whole picture here. Bethesda was going to release the "Topless plugin" for $1.99 on PC and 200 points on 360.

This guy just beat them to the punch.
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 12:57PM MosquitoControl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Haha, he hates censorship, but this wasn't it.

The game shows people in their underwear. For most females, bras are underwear.

Now, had he removed every bit of underwear from every gender, well, he'd have slightly more validity. But not much. Not to mention no one forced Bethesda to do this.
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 1:26PM Don Jose said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Mmmmm...orc jugs....boioioioioinnggg!
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 1:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think its more about the lack of realism that a troll wearing a bra creates. It can take you out of the world of the game and remind you that you are infact, playing a game.

I do find this kind of censorship a bit silly and annoying, but I wouldn't go so far as to try and correct it myself...

...although, now that I think about it, I did do the same thing to the Giants: Citizen Kubuto game way back when...

-Matt
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 1:41PM D dogg said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Just me or does every race have the same body with different heads and skin?

Wonder if males are the same way. Good thing they didn't have to make dwarves or something.
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 2:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I hate to say what I am sure many of us are thinking, but how long before Jack Thompson jumps all over this?
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 2:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Okay, this isn't a bash...really it isn't...but I have to ask RocketSeason about this:

"I think its more about the lack of realism that a troll wearing a bra creates."

What parts lack realism, the troll or the bra? How would anyone even know if Trolls did or didn't wear bras? I thought they were completely fictional.

Remember to smile...I'm really just joking around with you. :-)
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 2:32PM BPMOmega XBL PSN Steam said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think the most appropriate comment to this is:

lol b00bz
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 3:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is actually almost the same as Hot Coffee because it is in the game already. Let's see what politicians and Jack Thompson make out of it.

Lucky me who I do not live in the US :).
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 3:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As far as who would want to see a feline-headed humanoid with exposed boobs... check the internet- you'll have your answer. =P They've been around for over 20 years and it's nothing new to them.

I personally want another rise of the Mog*Mod to be released. Those moogles were awesome. =D As far as Better Bodies goes, though... there's really no harm. =P The game doesn't center around a theme of sexuality (much), and when it does, it's a joking or passing theme, like the Guildmaster's son being gay, or a group of females robbing male perverts blind. Nakedness in a game where it doesn't center around a theme of "Holy mother, lookit those jubblies!" is the weakest battlefield for a legal argument pertaining to moral standards in non-exposure. No judge in his right mind would take such a case seriously. =P
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 4:36PM TheEmoryM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
At least it'll make the quest for Sanguine more interesting.
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 6:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hey #22 Scooby Doo

I guess its sort of the idea that trolls would be creatures who felt shame that I find a bit funny. To me, trolls are more like primative tribal people. One can compare them to the natives of africa and other remote regions of the world.

Also, would troll women be that worried about support? honestly? (god I am a nerd)
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 7:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Boobies....

Now put them in a game I give a f*%% about.
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 7:38PM ZeroCorpse said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I just think it's dumb that non-mammals have mammaries in these games. I love Oblivion, but what were they thinking giving breasts to lizard folk?
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 7:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
off topic here...but can you use a standard Xbox 360 controller on the PC version?
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 8:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have no problems with nudity, and am bothered by how negatively it's seen, but this does seem rather pointless. 1 topless character running around doesn't really make a statement.
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2006 8:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Looks like that witch from the Beastmaster.
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2006 5:08AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
hmmmm, how do i say without letting know i checked the video it's broken now. well it is :)
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2006 10:59AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why would a non-mammal like the lizard woman have breasts? Only mammals have mammaries.
Reply

Posted: Apr 7th 2006 12:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
First, the obligatory "OMGB00BZ".

I'm surprised our ever-popular Mr. Thompson hasn't jumped on this some way, some how. Considering the sheer popularity of the game you'd think he'd be on it like a pit bull on a pork chop.
Reply

Posted: Apr 8th 2006 6:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Okay, wow. Let's get some freaking perspective here.

In the game you are allowed to wipe out entire factions of people, steal, murder, whatever you like and people freak out about seeing a pair of breasts? I don't know who it was that figured that out but they ought to be shot.

Now don't get my wrong, I like the stealing and murdering just as much as the next guy, but I hardly think that seeing some breasts is going to corrupt anyone.

What we appear to have here is the inability for us to ever seperate church from state, we grew up on these rediculous morals held up in the "Good Book" and we are forced to conform to them even now. I for one do not follow any book and I find nudity and violence to be completely acceptable in entertainment. Let those that find this innappropriate turn away and hide from their nature.

As for children becoming corrupt due to this horrible depiction of nature, I have this to say. Read the rating on the box and don't buy it for your god damn kid if it's not something you consider appropriate! Hmm there's a thought, actually parenting your child instead of blaming society for own failure as a human being. Congratulations.

And to explain the statement of the author. Basically he's saying that game companies shouldn't have to go to great lengths to remove the sexuality from characters in no matter how minute a detail. Sexuality is normal and occurs in nature, there is no point in hiding it aside that the rules tell us we have to. I say it's time we changed those rules.

I will not be hiding behind that annonymity of the internet for this statement. Robin_s_13 at hotmail.com

I will appreciate any one willing to discuss this further. Spammers, threats and insults will be blocked, I only respond to sentient beings.

Rob Street
Vancouver, BC
Canada
Reply

Posted: Apr 9th 2006 11:15AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Is it ironic that throughout the whole second half of that video you can't see her boobs anyway, since the camera is behind her?
Reply

Posted: Apr 9th 2006 11:25AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Those sure are some perky, perfect C adolescent troll boobs there. They look nothing like national geographic, and more like...fake boobies. Call me traditional, but wouldn't troll breasts hang? I mean, it really looks like they were born in bras and only took them off for the first time just now. I don't know how much variation one can expect from a game, but it might help the 'non-pornographic' claim if they weren't hemispheres with timy nipples over impossibly small waists. Pixel me an upside down triangle breast, and maybe some thickness in the middle, and you've got a troll/wild creature female I can believe in. How 'realistic' can a fantasy game be when females of all ages and races look like a puberty Skipper (tm) doll? Give 'em shapless sacks to wear, and we can avoid the bras and the breasts that look like they have invisible bras 'ruining' our realism.
Reply

Posted: Apr 9th 2006 1:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
All i have to say to this comment:
10. This is worse than the Hot Coffee mod. I am fuming mad about this travesty. Why won't people think of the children? This game should have been rated Adult Only and only sold in stores where kids can't get in.

I'm drafting up a letter of complaint about this right now for my congressman and I suggest the rest of you do the same unless you want people to think seeing the naked body is good. Next thing you know kids will think women should walk around topless, and believe their female friends/wives/sisters/mothers should become strippers and prostitutes to satisfy their lustful urges. We wear clothing because our bodies are sinful twisted versions of Gods perfect image, just seeing a naked body can corrupt a person so badly that they will become an abomination. Only though legislature and additional laws can we protect ourselves from weakness.

I am also starting up a campaign to require all pets to be clothed while in public. Having naked animals gives the impression that it is ok to see sexual organs, but we all know that many studies have proven that seeing a naked animal is the first step into wanting to see people naked and only one step away from complete chaos. Every single rapist had seen a naked animal at one point in their lives, and therefore we can easily conclude that this is the reason they are driven to treat women as sexual objects, not people.

Please, think of the children.

is that whoever wrote this is on crack and needs to see a docter preferably one from the nuthouse...
Reply

Posted: Apr 9th 2006 1:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This guy wants to take a stand for individual rebellion against the censors. He will not be told what to do! Good for you bro...
Reply

Posted: Apr 9th 2006 1:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This guy wants to take a stand for individual rebellion against the censors. He will not be told what to do! Good for you bro...
Reply

Posted: Apr 9th 2006 2:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"is that whoever wrote this is on crack and needs to see a docter preferably one from the nuthouse..."

@ Vance Black: I hope you hinted the sarcasm in his tone.
Reply

Posted: Apr 9th 2006 2:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"36. All i have to say to this comment:
'10. This is worse than the Hot Coffee mod. I am fuming mad about this travesty. Why won't people think of the children? This game should have been rated Adult Only and only sold in stores where kids can't get in.

I'm drafting up a letter of complaint about this right now for my congressman and I suggest the rest of you do the same unless you want people to think seeing the naked body is good. Next thing you know kids will think women should walk around topless, and believe their female friends/wives/sisters/mothers should become strippers and prostitutes to satisfy their lustful urges. We wear clothing because our bodies are sinful twisted versions of Gods perfect image, just seeing a naked body can corrupt a person so badly that they will become an abomination. Only though legislature and additional laws can we protect ourselves from weakness.

I am also starting up a campaign to require all pets to be clothed while in public. Having naked animals gives the impression that it is ok to see sexual organs, but we all know that many studies have proven that seeing a naked animal is the first step into wanting to see people naked and only one step away from complete chaos. Every single rapist had seen a naked animal at one point in their lives, and therefore we can easily conclude that this is the reason they are driven to treat women as sexual objects, not people.

Please, think of the children.'

is that whoever wrote this is on crack and needs to see a docter preferably one from the nuthouse..."

^ My friend, comment #10 was completely facetious. Read it again, keeping in mind how silly it is, and I think you'll see what I mean.
Reply

Posted: Apr 9th 2006 2:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
most of you guys are just hating. I think the games we play should be much more realistic. I'm kinda sick haveing to play game that are supposetly "realistic" and there clothing don't rip or, there not naked when you customize you charactors. So I agree with the the creator of this game. If your under age and you play this game... then it's the parents falt.,. don't fu** it up for the people who are of age and want to play these game...!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

-painless
Reply

Posted: Apr 9th 2006 3:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have some stuffz to say about this...

'10. This is worse than the Hot Coffee mod. I am fuming mad about this travesty. Why won't people think of the children? This game should have been rated Adult Only and only sold in stores where kids can't get in.

I'm drafting up a letter of complaint about this right now for my congressman and I suggest the rest of you do the same unless you want people to think seeing the naked body is good. Next thing you know kids will think women should walk around topless, and believe their female friends/wives/sisters/mothers should become strippers and prostitutes to satisfy their lustful urges. We wear clothing because our bodies are sinful twisted versions of Gods perfect image, just seeing a naked body can corrupt a person so badly that they will become an abomination. Only though legislature and additional laws can we protect ourselves from weakness.

I am also starting up a campaign to require all pets to be clothed while in public. Having naked animals gives the impression that it is ok to see sexual organs, but we all know that many studies have proven that seeing a naked animal is the first step into wanting to see people naked and only one step away from complete chaos. Every single rapist had seen a naked animal at one point in their lives, and therefore we can easily conclude that this is the reason they are driven to treat women as sexual objects, not people.

Please, think of the children.'

What the...? everys single rapist had seen an animal naked at one point in their lives...EVERYONE has seen an animal naked. my guess is that you are a lonely teen who hasn't had a gf/bf EVER and is trying to make everyone else as unhappy as you are, or you are a 600-year old lady who, again, has never been in a relationship or anything like of the sort. bible-thumping lunatic. the human form is beautiful...idiot.

oh, about the mod? I guess it's alright...enuff debate about wether trolls would have mammories...its done that way to make them easily distinguishable in gender. and some ppl just like to look at fantasy boobs. let me give it a huge WHATEVER.
Reply

Posted: Apr 9th 2006 3:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If he's such against society's restrictions, why is the heading to his post "warning, CONTAINS NUDITY!" What, is the anarchist afraid he'll offend someone?
Reply

Posted: Apr 9th 2006 3:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
hmmm... interesting. well for the comment of wether its a bad thing... well duh dont argue about it where will that get you or them. if you dont like something you pray... sheesh. are you guys young of faith? are you ignorant? I say he/she should do what ever he wants and we should Love he/she for who they are. Go home and Love your family.
Reply

Posted: Apr 9th 2006 4:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
DUDE i give you a big double thumbs up i dont see why people freak out over nudity adam and eve were naked until they ate the forbidden fruit thenm they felt ashamed and covered themselves with leaves so as i figure it god wanted it where everyone was natural instead of closed so again a duoble thumbs up 5 star rating on your part
Reply

Posted: Apr 9th 2006 6:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
ok. I am a big modder for the previous elder scrolls game and can give a little insight. I know for a fact that people trying to "make the game natrual" or "realistic" just want to see animated nudeity. it is not realistic, no one walks around topless in socity, real or otherwise. and for the modder, if you want to see nudeity just say it outright, dont feed us that "fighting the government" krap ither. also, those who say the sex or nude mods are "funny" "halarious" or "amusing" mean they love it and only say it to cover up the fact. and for those who say " oh this is a sin and it will warp the minds of little children". to those- first; dont let little children play a rated M game, and I dont think seeing a little animated nudeity will turn him into a womonizer. and if you dont like the mod, here is a thought, dont download it, better yet dont buy the game. dont misinturprit this, i have no love for this mod or its kin, but it is all choice. i personaly dont download those types of mods, and no one else has to. its all choice.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW