| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (20)

Posted: May 3rd 2006 2:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
will Ron Mexico's wee have herpies on Wii?
Reply

Posted: May 3rd 2006 2:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Joystiq really seems to like making a point of mentioning 'graphical downgrades' for Wii games, and printing unnecessary speculation on Wii owners getting 'gypped' because of the system's 'shortcomings'.

EA's John Schappert sure thinks that Madden Wii looks great, and mentioned that he had some guys from Tiburon over and they thought the game looked stunning. Wait, what? Tiburon made Madden for the almighty 360, so the Wii's graphics should have made them nauseous to the point of throwing up, right? Oh, I guess not.

http://revolution.ign.com/articles/703/703727p1.html (Talk of graphics occurs on the third page.)

Apparently the graphics on Wii just aren't going to that horrible, believe it or not.
Reply

Posted: May 3rd 2006 2:38PM ProfKOS said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hell, I've been thinking for a while that Nintendo's going to have a staggered launch starting in Japan in late June/early July. The market needs less hyp there. Then an late August launch in North America, followed by November in Europe. That way they can avoid fighting for hype and shelf space with Sony.
Reply

Posted: May 3rd 2006 3:16PM HelghanSuperSniper said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree Zero. I popped in RE 1 (remake) RE4, Metroid Prime 1 and 2, Zelda WW, Burnout 2, F-zero and a boat load of other games in my Cube just to refresh my memory on the graphic quality issue. The games all looks great even now. I don't understand why Joystiq keeps posting these sideways comments about downgraded graphics for the Wii. I understand the difference in spec but it goes back to the common understanding...you need all of that horsepower in the 360 and the PS3 for HD.

Or did we all forget that GC was pushing stupid amounts of Ties in Rogue, or the silly amount of Pikmin that were on screen at the same time in Pikmin....what about the crazy battles in Battalion Wars? Oh did I forget about the cracked out villagers in RE4.

Nintendo has made a console that (in theory) can surpass Metroid Prime and RE4 quality with ease. Look at those games and tell me twice the quality of that is bad.
Reply

Posted: May 3rd 2006 3:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As long was Blitz on the N-Wii looks better than Blitz! for the Vectrex (in which one team was represented by X's, and the other team by squares), I will be satisfied.
Reply

Posted: May 3rd 2006 3:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's called "some so-called 'editors' for Joystiq being biased."

Oh and I asked a buddy of mine at Midway Chicago (he's a designer on the Stranglehold) about the Blitz team. He said they are in that office but he has no idea if that October 2006 dates is true or not.

It could be either:

(a) A typo and was meant to say November 2006

or

(b) Midway just dropped a bomb before Nintendo's Press Conference.
Reply

Posted: May 3rd 2006 3:24PM SAgreatn said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Tell you what I will do. I'll look at a video and tell you twice the quality of that is still not up there with 360 and PS3 graphics, and that if companies want to do a raw port, they'll have to downgrade.
Reply

Posted: May 3rd 2006 3:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This has everything to do with hardware specs. Which, as most of the Nintendo loving joystiq readers know...means nothing. Since most of the general population does not own a HDTV, then the extra money spent of developing "graphics" for HD sets is wasted. I would venture to say that Wii (or is it "The Wii"), will look very good sitting next to a 360 on a 480i display. There is a reason PC gamers do not play with a resolution that low....it all looks the same, regardless of the hardware.

Back on topic. Who wants ports on Wii anyway??? I want a new experience.
Reply

Posted: May 3rd 2006 3:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
We havn't even seen what the Wii can do yet in terms of graphics. Nintendo has always delivered with there graphics so we will have to wait and see.
Reply

Posted: May 3rd 2006 4:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah I thought it could be a mistake because all the others say the other consoles then the wii in November 2006 so maybe they just forgot, I sure hope its in November just because I got my birthday in October and I want to know how much cash I have in my wallet.
Reply

Posted: May 3rd 2006 4:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
In my perspective i will say that wii is going to match the 360's graphics not sure about the ps3 though.
Reply

Posted: May 3rd 2006 4:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"I got my birthday in October and I want to know how much cash I have in my wallet."

Same here. Even though money won't be really a problem for me, having money from gifts doesn't hurt either.
Reply

Posted: May 3rd 2006 5:18PM HelghanSuperSniper said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ Paul, the point is, will it look bad? When it's all said and done I see the best example is looking at Metroid Prime Hunters on DS and then looking at Coded Arms on PSP. Sure Coded Arms looks good, but I can still look at Metroid Prime Hunters with pride and be satisfied that I have a much better chance of getting that needed headshot on DS than ANY gamer ever will on PSP. Superior controls and gameply rule even with inferior tech.
Reply

Posted: May 3rd 2006 5:21PM HelghanSuperSniper said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
dang it, messed up my message by sending it too fast...I think Wii will still look good. It won't have all of the bells and whistles of the other consoles but so what. No one complained when they saw MGS3 on PS2 or FFXII. Look at Tourist Trophy for crying out loud. That's on PS2 and I don't see anyone bitching about graphic quality with that.
Reply

Posted: May 3rd 2006 5:24PM SAgreatn said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, but no one said it would look bad. They just said the graphics wouldn't be up to 360 and PS3 level, which they won't. If someone ports a game, they have to dumb down the graphics, simple as that. Doesn't mean the graphics look bad, so it annoys me when I see people getting offended because someone is just stating a fact.

And of course most games won't be just raw ports, but something like Blitz: The League from a company like Midway sure as hell could be.
Reply

Posted: May 3rd 2006 6:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Remember how Wii is going to have very comparable graphics to PS3 and Xbox 360 on a regular television? I bet Blitz for Wii will look very comparable to Blitz for the other systems on a regular television, but not on a high-def television.
Reply

Posted: May 3rd 2006 6:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"They just said the graphics wouldn't be up to 360 and PS3 level, which they won't."

But how do you know? Have you seen screenshots from all three games?
Reply

Posted: May 3rd 2006 11:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
He knows because the specs aren't capable of it.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2006 1:45AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
attacking their kiddie-centric image? they just named the console Wiiiiii for goodness sake.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2006 4:35AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"He knows because the specs aren't capable of it."

It's called "on paper" for a reason. Electronics "on paper" and "real time" are 2 different things.

Until all is unveiled next week, EVERYTHING is speculation.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW