| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (339)

Posted: May 9th 2006 2:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Leto: "No offense but just look at the tennis screenshots, my 4 month old niece could draw those graphics."

So you pick one game and ignore the dozen+ other examples, while hiding behind your art prodigy niece. That is such a brilliant way of actually not saying anything productive or meaningful. Bravo!

Posted: May 9th 2006 2:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Its definitely a copy cat move. If you don't see that you are blind. In the sony press conference this was one of there emphasized lines...."you don't need a sensor". That right there puts a cheap jab at nintendo. And for anyone crying about the "lame" nintendo press conference, its total BS. The point of today is to show off the controller working, not to unveil some huge surprise.

Posted: May 9th 2006 2:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Hate to inject a little bit of reality into the conversation, but Red Steel's visual quality lacks the sex and sparkle of the Sony demos yesterday --"

Are you serious?? Did you really expect it to?

Posted: May 9th 2006 2:35PM zsavior said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Honestly three things disappointed Me,

No pricing: I like that they want to give next-gen gaming for cheaper. BUt I also want a system that has an appropriate price for what it is.

No Date: No date, while I appreciate the sensitivity of their secrets, Zelda has been dangled around infront of my face for to long. THis isn't the "Hundred Acre WOODS", and I am not EEYORE so stop dangling the Twilight Princess infront of my face like a Carrot. You didn't make it WII compatible for me, you made it compatible cause it is late, and will sell some systems. For a Loyal GC fan that is kind of messed up stringing us out!

Last Not enough Games: I think they focused way to much on the simulation type of games. Made it seem like the NIntendo WII was more about simulating life into games, rather than innovating games for your life. I got nothing against the Tenis game, hell they looked like they were having real fun. Yet hearing "Wear baggy clothes" as a description on how to play a game console does not excite me. I want console gaming not High school Gym class.

What I think I wanted, was a look at the controller giving me more character functionalty. As in using the pointer part of the nunchucks to make my character more agile while the joystick part of the nunchucks move him along. I saw that In the Mario Galaxy game which excited me. Twirling the Pointer to make him do an offesive/defensive move WHILE using the Joystick to move him. Imagine a Shinobi game that utliized this idea, and others.

WHat I was given was a healthy dose of excitment. Make no doubt about it I am excited for the WII, but the problem I feel is, can Nintendo live up to the expectations of gaming I have in my head? I think this may be the problem honestly, but honestly only time will tell. I just hope the designers and developers minds are as grand and broad as the gamers anticpating them to be. The show wasn't bad hell it was damned entertaining, it just felt that every minute an explosion was about to happen, and yet it didn't finish. It kind of felt like going to a concert and hearing a Legendary band play, and then they leave you hanging with out hearing their signature song. The only way I can describ it is like this; it is a description my music teacher once gave, I will try to duplicate it.

" IIII Can't get NOOOo.. SAAA.TISSS...FAC." and then the song ends band packs up says thank you and good night and runs off the Stage. ( Or in the Stones case wheels off.

You expect to rock out with signature greatness, instead you are left longing for greatness to come. I mainly think that is my only problem with this presentation. Even though that sound attachment on the WIImote had to make Sony want to shoot themselves in the head. Gave me a quick chuckle.

Posted: May 9th 2006 2:38PM WedgeTalon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
295. You heard it hear first, the Nintendo Wii had blurry bland graphics and a resolution of 320x240! What a suckfest! It will even disconect every 30 seconds and have to cache. The sound has obvious heavy mpeg compression as well.

Posted at 2:29PM on May 9th 2006 by Sean Dugan

Bravo. Don't forget that it will also auto-shutoff 30-90 seconds before it's finished.

Posted: May 9th 2006 2:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Did you really expect them to reaveal the price?? Sony proved yesterday why Nintendo likes to keep their info secret.

Nintendo gives their price today and Microsoft has a ton of time to plan a strategy to combat Nintendo's low price, i.e lowering the lower end 360 to a comprable price, heck, might even try to match it... they have proven they do not mind losing tons o money.

Posted: May 9th 2006 2:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The controller looks really good,the graphic on the other hand is ok,not very impressive.
It was expected it wont be on par with the 360 but common Nintendo at least the graphics should be twice as good as the old xbox.Maybe it is I dont know,but it didnt look like it.
If it aint that is fair to say Nintendo did a mistake here.How expensive can 5 year old technolige just be.

Posted: May 9th 2006 2:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The Gamecube and Xbox had better graphics than the PS2 and nobody cared, so why should Nintendo feel the need to measure up to the PS3's graphics? If history is any indication of what will happen, the same core consumers that purchased the PS2 will purchase the PS3. That's an inevitability, so instead of trying to wow hardwired Sony loyalists, Nintendo has opted to "disrupt" Sony's hegemony by lowering cost and introducing a radical interface.

As far as, buying the system: chances are it won't be your cup of tea if you consider yourself a hardocre technophile whose parents shower you with disposable income. But that will likely change once more people get their hands on the system.

Posted: May 9th 2006 2:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Sony's taking more risks this generation. Blu-Ray's success is critical to multiple lines of business that keep Sony afloat. It's huge investment in complex technology that will make or break the company in the decade to come. That's risk. Even if the Wii were to end up in third place again (as several analysts we talked to yesterday predicted it would), Nintendo will still survive. If Sony were to fail to capture dominant marketshare this generation, the results would be catastrophic. That's risk, and we just wanted to set the record straight on it.
"

WHY DID YOU ADD THIS PIECE OF SHIT TO THE END OF YOUR ARTICLE YOU RETARDED FUCK. NOBODY CARES ABOUT YOUR SONY FANBODY COMMENTARY, YOU WORTHLESS SACK OF SHIT. POST THE NEWS, FUCK YOUR OPINION.

Posted: May 9th 2006 2:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
woah there nyc, this is a blog, they can post what ever they damn feel like.

why did you post that, nobody needs to hear your insane use of caps and anger about a comment made for a video game system

Posted: May 9th 2006 2:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
where was the cradle, to play non wii-mote specific games?

Posted: May 9th 2006 2:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report

Posted: May 9th 2006 3:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The whole point of this conference was to pitch a message to gamers and investors on new Nintendo projects, although most of this target group were not at conference. Instead it was up to mostly industry professionals and marketing/media firms to propagate this message. IMO Nintendo did a great job because their message was easily caught by Joystiq and successfully relayed back to those who read this blog or watched the conference. Playing is Believing is a good, inviting slogan which reaches out for the masses. You can tell that Nintendo marketing and exec team did some serious work for this presentation.

As for the future of Wii, if the sales for DS is of any indication Wii should be just as successful. The DS is in many ways like the Wii, they are both more innovative and cheaper than the competition, although they are weaker in the hardware department. Looking at the game sales of PSP vs DS only reinforces the belief that gamers care more about price and playability, than fancy graphics and cool (but non-gaming related) features. This is exactly the same message which Nintendo is trying to tell the industry professionals, and ultimately the gamers.

Posted: May 9th 2006 3:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If it is $250, it will take quite a bit to make me want to plunk down $ for it at launch. It's going to have to be a very persuasive bribe to convince me to buy something with an asinine name like "wii" and bring it into my home.

How about a limited-edition faceplace that reads "Revolution?"

Posted: May 9th 2006 3:30PM JCA said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"its also meticulous about controlling hardware costs, managing contracts and quality control, and in general ensuring that the margins are there to make a console profitable. "

In other words, they are doing EXACTLY what engineers do in a good engineering firm you Goober. :-D

"these aren't bet-the-farm risks"

If you were CEO at a company, how often would you bet the farm? Not often is the answer you should be struggling for.

Sony is a ginormous company with revenue streams from many different markets not just gaming....they didn't all of a sudden turn into a focused gaming company with the release of the PS1 and PS2. I agree that financial risks are inherently needed on occasion and I agree that gaming is important to Sony's bottom line, but you're over-emphasizing how catostrophic a failed PS3 would be and how risky their new technologies are to the health of the company.

Sony can take this risk because they can afford it, plain and simple. They've spread costs amongst several companies in development of the Cell and BluRay as well. Whatever they didn't spread they can absorb. If they couldn't, they wouldn't take the "risk" cause that would just be stupid.

Nintendo's risks are palpable but don't depend so much on experimental technology cause they are a gaming company only and are of the mindset that you don't need TERAFLOPS of data processing power in order to make a great gaming experience.

What you must recognize is that the reason the Cell and BluRay are even in PS3 is because they want those products to become mainstream for Sony's other markets and generate fresh revenue. If that potential wasn't there in the PS3, the PS3 would be as risky as a XBOX 360 which (Hardware-wise) is not risky or revolutionary at all....merely evolutionary.

I guess it all depends on how we want to define the risk. Sony is risking money in order to gain acceptance and Nintendo is risking a new approach to current gaming trends in order to gain acceptance.

Posted: May 9th 2006 3:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
actually Sega had a console out in Japan before Nintendo's Famicom, the Master System we got was their third version of it, or something like that. Granted, Sega (and others) did copy things that Nintendo innovated - Sega's 3d controller for Saturn copied the N64 controller (and was better.)

wii will pwn.

Posted: May 9th 2006 3:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ 44:

I agree with all your statements except one.

First, let me clarify one thing. I do not hate Sony. Nor do I even dislike it. I like them much more than Microsoft, I just don't buy their systems because my best friend does, so I play it over at his place.

However, I will say that the motion-sensing PS3 controller IS a copy. It isn't a free-space thing like Nintendo's controller, but it does contain the accelerometer/tilt senser like the Nunchuk unit, which was, of course, around long before PS3's controller ability was.

Not only is it a blatant copy, it's also probably going to fail. Like you said yourself, the player will have to hold the controller in an unnatural-feeling way in order to make use of the senser most of the time. So I agree there.

Well, enough said. Let the argument die.

Posted: May 9th 2006 3:59PM bobfet1 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I would like to take issue with the comment at the end about how Nintendo is a risk-averse, conservative company.

In business, there is a difference between RISK and STUPIDITY. If you don't control your margins so you can actually make money off of a console, that isn't risk - that's stupidity! I don't see how you can equate ensuring that they can stay in operation through quality control and cost control with conservatism. It's just good business.

RISK is innovation - Nintendo has demonstrated risk in its willingness to take gaming beyond its traditional boundaries (standard controller, core gamer audience) with things like the DS touchscreen, Wii controller, and new mainstream-market strategy.

STUPIDITY is betting the success of your system/ company on something that could go either way, and counting on a lot to make it happen. Remember Sony's Memory Stick? where did that get them? Remember those PSP UMD's? What if the world goes HD-DVD instead of Blu-ray? That's stupidity!

Posted: May 9th 2006 4:20PM jappleng said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I slept through the conference >_< I woke up at 2PM. I am not worthy of being a Wii fan!!! *starts to cry*

Posted: May 9th 2006 4:51PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
To those that are criticizing the look of the graphics of the games shown: Nintendo showed a mix between games that are almost complete, games that are in development, and just plain tech demos. I mean, you really can't take the tennis game they showed and use that as an example to attack the graphical powers of the Wii as it was no where near a complete and polished game. The best way to imagine the graphical possibilities of the Wii is to look at Zelda. Considering that until a short while ago it was a GC game, one can assume that it doesn't take much advantage of the Wii beyond the remote. So if the Wii is really two or even three times as powerful as the GC you can imagine what second generation games will look like. The Wii will have good graphics and great games.

Posted: May 9th 2006 6:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ 312.

There are still people who won't buy a product because of the name? Sheesh, grow up already.

It (Wii) is proving to be (At BARE MINUMUM) the most interesting console out there, and maybe the even the funnest. It's even cheaper than the others by at least $150! But no, you're going to go buy the less fun, more expensive stuff because they have un-asanine names like "Playstation" and "Xbox".

I guess some people just like Stations where you Play and Boxes with X's on them more than other things with names representing togetherness and fun.

Posted: May 9th 2006 7:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wonder if anyone noticed (and I won't read the 300+ comments to find out if), but when Scott Dyer came up to have a go at the Tennis game, all he did was pick up the WiiMote and start hitting. No need to learn about which buttons to press.

This is what Nintendo has been getting at when they mentioned about making games easier to pick up by anyone.

Posted: May 9th 2006 8:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So am I right in thinking that there will be a big surprise at the end, or something more to be revealed? Because I was under the impression after this morning's press conference that it was the speaker in the remote, but that didn't seem like was a big surprise. However how can there be a big surprise still to be revealed if they have already shown people playing the system? Are they not playing the complete system?

Posted: May 9th 2006 8:46PM Korova Pamplona said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Swiit!

Posted: May 9th 2006 9:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow you nintendo fanboys are more like nintendo school girls. all you can talk about when you go to the sony media conference comments section is how "nintendo is good and sony sucks" (WHICH IS 100% OPPOSITE) and then once you have filled that up with comments you come over here and have nothing to talk about so you talk about how you hate sony some more. I guess your just jealous SONY has LED THE MARKET for TWO STRAIGHT GENERATIONS now and nintendo has gotten pushed aside. well guess what, sony will lead again and nintendo wiill trail again. so get used to losing and keep filling up the comments section on sony posts.
Later

Posted: May 9th 2006 11:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So, ps3 stole a peice of the Wii's inovation. Good for them, even though the technoligy might look the same, it's not. Don't expect Wii games to come out on the ps3 since the ps3 controler is very limited in what it can do when comparing it to the Wii controler.

Ps3 controler = limited movement, it can only be tilted on that same position.

Wii controler = Tilt,Point,and push and pull movement.


No wii games will come out on the ps3 even though sony failed horribly to rip off yet another great inovation.

Posted: May 10th 2006 2:22AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reggie scares the crap out of me.

http://img75.imageshack.us/img75/4788/regii7fs.jpg

Posted: May 10th 2006 7:57AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I am a hardcore gamer. As are a few of my friends. We have all came to the same conclusion at once. PS3: a no go until it's $400 or less. We are all pumped...and I mean PUMPED for the Wii.
After reading this article...I am so glad Nintendo is around.
Long live Nintendo.

Posted: May 11th 2006 12:26AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh my...


This is just one huge bucket of great news. Nintendo, I love you.

Posted: May 11th 2006 11:39AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
GAH! *DIES* im disapointed that there wasn't any super smash brothers wii info. *SOBS* im really looking forward to that game. but so far the nintendo wii looks awesome. i'd expect nothing less from nintendo after the ds came out.

crap on sony for stealing, YES STEALING nintendo's ideas. i wasn't planing on buying ps3 in the first place cuz it costs so damn much, but now i will die before i spend money on a ps3 when i can buy more and more games for my Wii.

im glad im not the only one that thought xbox360 was a semi waste of money....i dont even use it anymore. i only bought it because perfect dark zero and dead or alive 4 was comming out on it. *puts it on ebay*

but if anyone finds out any info on Super Smash Brothers Wii please be so kind to let me know.

Posted: May 11th 2006 8:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I liked the name REVOLUTION a bit better than Wii. But I'm still getting it, and a DS Lite....and looks like 2 copies of Zelda too!! I need a JOB! HIRE ME!!!

Posted: May 12th 2006 3:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I, for one, am glad at the fact Nintendo did not announce the price and release date. It will give them something to keep everyone watching them. A very smart move by Nintendo.
I would like to know these things, but it was still a smart move by Nintendo.
I like the look of the PS3, but, really, who has that kind of money to use on video-games?

Posted: May 15th 2006 4:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Tool kicks ass.

It's been told that games will be cheaper to make on the Wii than the PS3 and the 360. One such developer(can't remember who) even said that Wii games could be as much as a quarter of the price of the other two.

This would bring about some changes. Most likely, companies who are exclusively signed with Microsoft and Sony will begin making games for the Wii instead.

So, the Wii has the advantage this generation. At least, in my opinion it does.

And what dude said at the end of that blog about Sony being the one taking risks:

I'd say relying on one feature of your console to keep your ENTIRE company alive wouldn't be called "Risky."

It would be called STUPID.

Posted: May 15th 2006 4:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report

Posted: May 18th 2006 10:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
all i want to know is when and how much...

Posted: May 19th 2006 2:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nintendo is going to dominate the market alongside Microsoft. Everything seen here is going to kill the ps3. The ps3 appeals to the same gaming crowd as the 360, and has much weaker developer support. Nintendo will pick up on the share of the market that it's always held onto, as well as more casual and non-gamers to catch up with MS.

Say Goodnight Sony.

Posted: May 20th 2006 3:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
(going back to comment 17)Well, see, the friend codes and all of that, that is what websites are for. For example,I go to neopets.com, I am in a nintendo ds wi-fi guild(the only thing I do on neopets)and I just give my friend codes to them, and then we battle. There are also websites, like nintendowifi.com that you can go to and exchange friend codes with people you barely know. So really, it is just like a PS(2 and 3), you CAN face people you dont even know, So really, the Wii system will friggin rock.and also remember..
would you want a Wii, which costs less and provides more things when you buy it, or would you like a PS3, it costs more,does not have better gameplay, and does not provide extra things..
Wow, tough decision..

Posted: May 22nd 2006 7:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I REALLY WISH THAT THE WII WILL COST ABOUT 300$ BUT SONYS BEING REALLY GAY FOR PRICING THE PS3 500$ TO 600$,SOME PEOPLE WANT IT BUT THEY JUST DONT HAVE THE MONEY!!!!!!THE WII HAS A LOT MORE OF GAME THAT ARE MADE OFF OF THE OLDER GAMES AND THATS WHY I THINK THE WII SHOULD BE THE BEST!!!!(PLUS I LIKE ZELDA,MARIO,AND METROID PRIME)

Posted: Aug 13th 2006 4:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
do you guys when its coming out?? please i really need to know im going to the states this september and i wanna know if it out by then:D ty

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW