| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (63)

Posted: May 18th 2006 4:08PM Hoffer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've got to say that I'm a techno geek, but have never been interested in a PSP. They look really sharp, but I haven't seen any game of interest. Plus, I'm not going to play a PS2 game with only one analog stick. Why didn't they put 2 analog sticks on it??? I'm also not interested in the homebrew stuff or watching a movie on a little screen like that.

Posted: May 18th 2006 4:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thing is that EU ppl dont understnd waht psp is for, ppl who does go for Nintendo DS...
yes you can do more with PSP. (i think)PSP is very cool but... its To Expensive POINT!!!
PPL in EU are gamers like: WoW/CALLofDUTY/Batlefield/SIMS/Oblivion
and Japs like kiririukukiri... or sumthin (stick in a bird)
Sony is losing my fovo game cause they think $ is more important than fun

i go for DS and WII or GCube

LAME X360 is for big fat american kids (with 1 galon cola a day) playing PC games on console because they are to stupid to play games on PC muahahaa

Posted: May 18th 2006 4:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow, this is probably the worst Joystiq post in a long time. Not only does it not have any significance to anything, but people also fail to realize that the PSP is outselling the DS in the US.

Posted: May 18th 2006 4:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Does anyone know if business analysts actually pay attention to this anyway?

All I've ever seen them pay attention to is the bottom line number of console distributed from the manufacturer and as you can guess offers like this just go to help the bottom line.

Posted: May 18th 2006 5:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If it wasn't neccessary before, why is it suddenly now? 360, PSP, it's all shit, who cares?

Posted: May 18th 2006 9:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Not in regards to the story, but in regards to some of the comments - You know, the ones with a degree of spelling mistakes and grammatical errors that causes one to question what that Darwin guy was smoking when he theorized that we were actually IMPROVING as a species...

Aside from the fact that the PSP is the first competitor that's even stood a chance against Nintendo's portable line (N-Gage anyone? ANYONE?), I hear Japanese sales figures putting the DS out at an insurmountable lead more often than I hear George W. Bush say something stupid.

At Nitendo's conference, they announced that the DS had sold around 16 million units and was "millions ahead" of the PSP.

Now, ignoring the higher price point and later launch date, and factoring in the fact that the DS is outselling the PSP by around a hundred thousand units each MONTH.... Does that not mean that the PSP must be outselling the DS in every other territory to be so close in terms of overall sales figures?

I own both, and quite frankly, sales figures don't mean squat to me. But if the DS was the unstoppable marketing behemoth Nintendo fanboys claim it is, why are they so obsessed about Japanese sales figures? Didn't the freaking SATURN do well there?

P.S. I lurve the Saturn. But it was still a major bomb in sales terms. Saturn anyone? ANYONE?

Posted: May 18th 2006 9:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You guys really need to change the title on the article. It's totally misleading and it pisses a lot of people off. Not to mention it gives a bad image of the writer/site if you actually read the article and find that the title is BS.

As a side note, the DS has sold 4.7 million units in the US, the PSP has sold 4.5 million units. Considering the PSP came out a WHILE after the DS and the PSP has been outselling the DS monthly for the last 1/3 of a year or so, I think that it's doing great, especially since Nintendo holds the majority of handheld prominance still.

Posted: May 18th 2006 10:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i think i understood what you said there gaining more than there losing with the psp in europe by making it cheaper but making people have a phone to pay for which makes you pay more in the long run correct?

Posted: May 18th 2006 11:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm really glad you were able to stop this misconception about that PSP that absolutely no one had.

Posted: May 19th 2006 12:03AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The Japanese sales figures are mentioned because the Japanese are far more accurate then any other markets.

Also Sony only relies on shipped numbers. Meaning all those replacement units for defective pixels are counted.

The PSP is pretty much only sold because of Sony image, piracy of it's games, because you can watch porn movies on it.

PSP game sales are pretty much in the toilet as is UMD.

The DS had a drought of good games since third parties were resistant to it's concept of the touch screen, mic and dual screen usage.

Now with a 100 games coming out this year the DS is picking up a huge amount of steam.

I always find it amazing when how many Nintendo haters admit they hack their psp to play NES and Super NES ROMS which are illegal. Hell they hacked the psp to play gba ROMs.

Posted: May 19th 2006 2:08AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How about this?

I was looking around my favourite returns, excess stock and liquidation auction website: graysonline.com.au and noticed they were selling off around 30 PSP's from a retailer.

The retail for a PSP here in Australia is $399, however if you wanted one you could pick one up for around $270 from that site. Brand new.

I'm not sure if that means the PSP isn't selling to well here in Oz... but i'm inclined to think so!

Posted: May 19th 2006 2:56AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This tactic has been used by South African cell phone service providers since the days of PS-1. Buy the contract and you get x,y&z free. Anything from desktop pc's to PSP's. It's a really good sales tactic. Many companies do this in SA.

Posted: May 19th 2006 3:36AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
>>T-mobile are stupidly expensive compared to other networks here like O2 and orange

Eh? £7.50 for unlimited GPRS? I was on orange and it was £10 per Mb!

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW