| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (22)

Posted: Jun 1st 2006 3:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
In all reality, its one of the greatest controllers ever. Viva La OLD skewl.
Reply

Posted: Jun 1st 2006 3:16PM Dracula Jones said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Now, if he just made the controller out of Legos, half the internet would be saying, "Man, I want to cross THAT street!"
Reply

Posted: Jun 1st 2006 3:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Personally, I think art has only 2 prerequisites:

1) It needs to portray a message from the artist.

2) There needs to be some sort of talent involved.

Number 2, of course, is the kicker. I just don't believe that you can stick a NES pad in a bucket of phisces and think you've created art.

It is NOT art because you got someone's attention.

It takes work, practice, and commitment to make art.

This is why I DO think games CAN be art.....but this isn't it.
Reply

Posted: Jun 1st 2006 3:44PM 007craft said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You dont need talent to be artisits. Their are million dollar paintings of nothing but paint splotches and lines which are considered "art" yet a pre-school child could paint a better picture.
Reply

Posted: Jun 1st 2006 3:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think portraying a message IS talent enough, if somehow almost every avarege guy walking by the button sees it and think "yeah, I totally know what he means!", then it would be art.
Reply

Posted: Jun 1st 2006 3:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If one person says something is art and at least one other person agrees -- then you have art. Doesn't need talent, a message or anything else. Totally subjective.
Reply

Posted: Jun 1st 2006 3:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
*points to the words "Personally, I think" in my last post*

Art is obviously in the eye of the buyer. Isn't it?

You don't see me buying any of those paintings. Do you?

If you want my money, you need more than my attention. You need talent.
Reply

Posted: Jun 1st 2006 3:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have an NES pad that I consider art. It's connected to an NES.
Reply

Posted: Jun 1st 2006 3:56PM phoenixgeek said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Art is anything someone wants to call it anymore, I was recently in an Art Museum in St. Louis and on the 3rd floor they had a piece of wire on the wall in a seemingly random shape, it was in the same room as a blank canvas and a cube made of glass. There are people who don't consider any of these art but obviously there are others that do.
Reply

Posted: Jun 1st 2006 4:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Here's my question - why does it have to be art? Why not do something like this for sheer entertainment value?

Actually, worth noting that for all we know, that's the reason this was done in the first place. So rather than get caught up in what's art (which has been pointless since around 1920, thanks to Dada), let's just focus on fun.
Reply

Posted: Jun 1st 2006 4:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Am I the only one thinking this whole retro trend is really damned getting old? (No pun intended). I grew up on the NES, still collect NES games to this day and the invocation of an icon from my childhood for amusement's sake stopped working on me somewhere around when Hot Topic started selling shirts with the Konami code on them.

What once felt nostalgic and fun now just feels plundered and lazy.
Reply

Posted: Jun 1st 2006 4:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Getting really damned old, I mean.

It's 4PM and I've still had no caffeine. Go easy on me.
Reply

Posted: Jun 1st 2006 4:18PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Art is anything you want it to be.

There is, however, good art and bad art. To me, good art doesn't require "talent" or even a direct intended message. Good art should inspire thought and spark the imagination of its audience.

It should make you think more than "Wow that's totally awesome looking, I bet it took a really really long time to do!"

So is this good art? Who cares? Maybe it will jostle someone's brain out of normality for a minute of their life.
Reply

Posted: Jun 1st 2006 4:21PM Inquisitor Glokta said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
First of all, throughout history artists have obliterated the quotidian in order to construct their own worlds, but their art enriches vision. One might argue the ineptitude of the artist yet to me futility and purposelessness are givens in life and do not diminish my appreciation.

The piece is a consumerist statement which, alone speaks as articulately as the TV shows encountered in channel-flipping, yet taken as a whole is a delightful alchemical transformation. Once an aesthetically vapid object, now an eccentric gesture of whimsy.
Reply

Posted: Jun 1st 2006 4:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There's a constant 3 way race war into who can turn our town into the biggest craphole (and have succeded, Luton, UKs official crappest town)
So I actually wish something like this would happen in my town, the closest we get stuck to the road crossing buttons is chewing gum or a nice warm dog turd
Reply

Posted: Jun 1st 2006 5:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And the NES Bluetooth Controller Headset...

http://www.joystiq.com/2005/09/20/the-nes-controller-bluetooth-headset/

Which I made. ;-)
Reply

Posted: Jun 1st 2006 6:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
See, now I have the following exchange in my head:

Artist: You see, my piece shows the inherent misogyny of the modern culture, as designated by the symbol of control over that culture transposed with the source of masculine power. Moreover, by the usage of artificial lighting effects, I demonstrate the inherent falsehood of such an arrangement, and thus modern society. It is the absent feminine that is the real source of power, which this picture clearly lacks and thus demonstrates the sterility of modern society.

Critic: Dude, it's a picture of an NES controller balanced on an erect penis, with a lens flare Photoshopped in.

Artist: Well, if you want to be technical about it...
Reply

Posted: Jun 1st 2006 7:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Another first-party NES controller destroyed and defiled.
Good job.
Reply

Posted: Jun 1st 2006 7:50PM D3m0sthenes said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As long as it meant something to the artist...wouldn't it be art? I mean if I walked by that it would make me think a little and appreciate the good old days when their were pixels instead of polygons and gameplay ruled over all other catagories.
P.S. I want one of those NES belt buckles...

The Raikage
Reply

Posted: Jun 1st 2006 7:51PM Captin Shmit said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"9.Why not do something like this for sheer entertainment value?
...
for all we know, that's the reason this was done in the first place."

I'm pretty sure it was a joke. I doubt this guy even had art on his mind at all.
Reply

Posted: Jun 1st 2006 10:10PM ZeroCorpse said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've said this for a while now. This 8-bit nostalgia is not art. It's silly.

The same goes for all the love you guys give to the 8-bit cover bands. It's not talent. It's not art. It's a bunch of slacker Gen-Y kids playing tunes they heard a few thousand times from memory on real instruments. No creativity, no talent (aside from the skill to play at all) and no audience outside of other nostalgic Gen-Y kids.

Reply

Posted: Jun 2nd 2006 6:10AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Anyone else here think the image should read as "WE GET SIGNAL" instead?
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW