will play many of your really old games at an acceptable level, but you can forget about playing any recently released intensive 3D games (i.e. the ones you want to play). That's the conclusion MacWorld
has reached in its first look at the MacBook as a gaming machine.
The article suggests maxing out the RAM in the machine if you want to play games: the writer saw a 50fps increase in Quake 3 Arena
when he upgraded the machine from 512MB to 2GB. A nice finding for owners of MacBooks interested in a bit of retro gaming.
However, lets get something straight here, the MacBook is not
a gaming machine. It has an integrated graphics card. No computing hardware that lacks a dedicated graphics card should be even mentioned in the same sentence as "gaming."
We understand that some Mac owners may need to be persuaded to overlook this machine's blatant Achilles heel but it isn't MacWorld's
job to do this. The site is doing a disservice to its readers by pointing to the poor gaming performance of the MacBook and then suggesting that people "understand [the MacBook's] limitations"
and go "buy an XBox360 or Playstation2 for [their] gaming needs."
It's this sort of advice that gives Apple free reign to charge $149 for a paint job
(um, can I have a graphics card instead?) and allows the mainstream media to say things like "Mac users aren't into games."