| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (52)

Posted: Jun 9th 2006 6:29PM epobirs said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
They've turned characters into geography? How bizarre. Wouldn't an actual (within games) place like Peach's castle have made more sense?
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2006 6:33PM Nushio said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm no Nintendork, I'm a Nintendrone, and damned proud of it.

With that said, I need to get this Monopoly game. Now.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2006 6:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
The point of Monopoly is to buy and sell property, yes?
Why, then, have people buy the characters from the game, and not the land where the characters live (Hyrule, Mushroom Kingdom, etc.)?
Buying and selling people? Isn't that slavery?
And how, oh how, do hotels work in this macabre simulation?
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2006 6:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Samus.

I'd buy that.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2006 6:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
seems to me as they are simply matching the characters with their matching color
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2006 6:50PM HoopyHobo said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
You forget, board games are impervious to logic.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2006 6:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This isnt all the surprising, they have made every other kind of monopoly game you can think of.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2006 6:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If this is anything like the REAL Nintendo monopoly, is there a card that says "The courts have overturned your unethical contracts which gave you a stranglehold on third party developers, do not pass Go - do not collect $200,000 in royalties?"
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2006 6:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As fan of Monopoly and Nintendo all I can say is:

It's the best of two worlds!

Though I would've preferred Nintendo Characters instead of items. Still pretty damned awesome.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2006 6:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree with the other people on this post. Nintendo has some great locations that should have been used. The Rail Roads could have even been warp zones or something cool like that. The cheaper properties could have been the haunted houses from the Mario games and Boardwalk could have been something like Peach's Castle.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2006 7:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
At least they realize how worthless Waluigi is.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2006 7:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@6: I thought that card said "The courts find your business practices unethical and illegal. You must distribute 200,000 dollars to all customers currently subscribing to your magazine as 5$ coupons off the price of another Nintendo product, while making no changes to your business practices whatsoever."
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2006 7:21PM 007craft said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I too am a little dissapointed in the fact that the characters are land instead of actual nintendo places. Boardwalk could of been the mushroom kindom. Ill probably still get it tho since im a big fan of monopoly and I enjoy nintendo. I just hope the box is not retarded long like the usaopoly version of the simpsons monopoloy I have. The Hasbro Simpsons edition monopoly was supirior to the USAoploy version.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2006 7:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The pieces themselves are freaking cool, turtle shell ftw, but I'd have rather seen actual places in the Nintendo world as properties.

For example Mushroom Kingdom or whatever.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2006 7:29PM ZeroCorpse said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So when's that Nintendo edition of D&D come out?

(kidding! Although...)
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2006 7:34PM DarkSol said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What's that I hear? The sound of a million Nintendo fanboys fapping hardcore to this.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2006 7:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm so pre-ordering that...besides...my old Monopoly has fallen apart and is missing pieces.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2006 7:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Needs Kirby and Metroid themed pieces. And yeah, I'm with everyone saying they should have gone with Nintendo locations instead of characters, there's deffinately enough locationsto pull it off after all.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2006 7:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Come on now, the original monopoly board has a tophat(mario's hat), wheelbarrow(barrel), car(f-zero racer), battleship(arwing), horserider(epona & link), old boot(Goomba's Shoe), cannon(arm cannon), thimble(Pokeball), scotty dog(Nintendog), and iron(NES controller). They just could have had such a better set than they did, I hope there's more than just 6 pieces in the final board.

Oh, and I find it hysterical that Waluigi is the cheapest spot on the board.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2006 7:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I can already imagine the exclamations that are going to be made when the typical Nintendork gets this:

"Wow, look at those graphics! They look like, real life!"

"Wireless gameplay?! You mean this game doesn't need batteries?!"
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2006 8:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@20
someone needs to grow up.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2006 8:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why is this not a 3D game for DS? Cause I want it.

Is there a Monopoly game for DS?
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2006 9:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wonder when Sony's coming out with their version?

All they would have to do is double the prices for all the property and add a rule that after two trips around the board, you have to re-buy them.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2006 9:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This looks pretty good. I would rather of had more variety. It would have made a lot more sence if they made a Monopoly game tailored to specific Nintendo games. A Legend of Zelda, Super Mario, Metroid, Kirby, Old-school, and other big franchises could have worked very well. The problem would be the cost of course. I do like the idea and am planning on picking this item up
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2006 9:30PM f0gel35 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I was thinking to myself that the world needed another themed base monopoly game.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2006 9:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Man I was looking forward to this, but why they make us buy characters? That sucks.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2006 10:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Who's Mayfair????
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2006 10:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
...and I was just thinking, no one is making you buy one so what does it matter.
Reply

Posted: Jun 9th 2006 10:32PM Andir30 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"I wonder when Sony's coming out with their version?

All they would have to do is double the prices for all the property and add a rule that after two trips around the board, you have to re-buy them."

...or Microsoft's version where you can only win by relying on one territory and nickel and dime the rest of the players by requiring they pay monthly fees and buying partial houses at inflated rates. Everyone starts off with $5 billion and has 10 years to try to make it back. The game can only last for 4.5 rounds because after that you run out of virtual real estate ... unless you can somehow figure out how to reduce the cost of the land so you can go around another 4.5 times without switching boards.
Reply

Posted: Jun 10th 2006 12:07AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@23. & 28.

Lol...Nice!!!

Do you think in the Sony-opoly version of the game you'll be able to steal ideas/jump on the bandwagon to try and boost your chances at coming out on top?
Reply

Posted: Jun 10th 2006 1:37AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You know, I *am* a Nintendork (http://www.nintendorks.com). The least the submitter could do is give some brothas a link in the article.

Evidently somebody in NOA IP Licensing got a letter from upstairs with the subject "Do what must be done!"

And I actually bought the Nintendo-themed UNO deck:
(http://www.target.com/gp/detail.html/602-2057298-5793434?_encoding=UTF8&frombrowse=1&asin=B00023DETE)

Honestly, I was happy to buy the Nintendo Uno. I've been wanting an Uno deck for a while -- I lost mine in college. Instead of 8 regular Wild Cards in the deck, there are 4 WCs and 4 "Power" cards, which allow you to negate the Draw-2 or Draw-4 played on you (and pick the next color). Of course, the Power card has an invincibility star on it. The new card type gives Uno an interesting compontent in play (albeit doesn't change much of the strategies, or what strategy there is in Uno).
Reply

Posted: Jun 10th 2006 3:02AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
sony and xbox would be a hard board to come up with if we based it on buying people like the nintendo monopoly. I mean for xbox boardwalk would be master cheif for sure but then who else do they have. Sony I guess it would be crash. They both lack charcters compared to Nintendo.
Reply

Posted: Jun 10th 2006 4:00AM f0gel35 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
#27 Because it is taking up shelf space that could be devoted to Axis and Allies. Seriously, it doesn't matter.
Reply

Posted: Jun 10th 2006 4:25AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@26:

Mayfair = Boardwalk = Mario.

I'm guessing Park Lane (whatever the Boardwalk's other half is) is the Princess.

And yes, I need this too.
Reply

Posted: Jun 10th 2006 5:00AM BPMOmega XBL PSN Steam said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is kinda similar to the Pokémon Monopoly from a while back.
Each "property" was a Gym Leader's Pokémon. And when you buy them you actually "defeat" them.
Houses and hotels were replaced by Pokémarts and Pokécenters, respectively.
And a neat bonus feature were Pokémon Powers that activated when both dice landed on the same number. Like you could warp to different squares, or draw a Chance card, etc.

I do agree, though, that have two Zelda items isn't a good idea. With so many things in the Nintendoverse, they could have opted for some more variety. A Poké Ball? Samus's Gunship? An Arwing? The Blue Falcon? Kirby's Warpstar?
And, having both Koopa Shell and Mario's Cap is a bit redundant, too. Though, they still make better choices than a pair of boots.

And I say a star to V1L3 for post #8! XD
Reply

Posted: Jun 10th 2006 5:05AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Considering that their characters are their property, it makes sense, to a degree. It's just hard for most people to come to grips with that since in regular monopoly, you're buying and selling land.

Maybe instead of building houses, you're creating minigames and instead of hotels, Triple A titles. I'm guessing they're gunna stick with houses though... which in that case, characters as property wouldn't make sense.
Reply

Posted: Jun 10th 2006 10:09AM kevnt said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm a little upset at the lack of Pokemon, but I suppose since they have their own version of Monopoly it balances out.
Reply

Posted: Jun 10th 2006 10:47AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
noone is mentioning the fact that they are pimpimg out princess zelda at the ohh so affordable price of $300.
Now as soon i as i get that anti-pimping law out of the way.....
Reply

Posted: Jun 10th 2006 12:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nah, just like any other Monopoly out there but with a few pictures. I could do better with a printer.
Reply

Posted: Jun 10th 2006 12:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Now theres only one board game left to complete my Mario collection:

Mario OPERATION!

Although, I'm sure Mario wouldn't enjoy that....
Reply

Posted: Jun 10th 2006 1:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ #29

LOL!
They should make the Nintendo version where you have to go around the board 5 times, to buy all their GBA revisions!

Or you have to jump on the DVD bandwagon!(a generation too late!)
Reply

Posted: Jun 10th 2006 2:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I absolutley love nintendo, but I CANNOT sit and play a game of Monopoly for nothing. It gets boring to me....it just lasts too long.

If they come up with The Game of Life: Nintendo Edition let me know though. :-P
Reply

Posted: Jun 10th 2006 4:39PM Calazon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ok, what... the... fuck. You guys rag on comments that show fanboyism, but then you go ahead and completely bash people that play Nintendo games? Obviously your website is never going to get any type of respect from major companies, unless you bring in writers that can post sensible blogs, and not this imature shit you've been working with recently.
Reply

Posted: Jun 10th 2006 5:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
the microsoft version would somehow require 4 d sized batteries =D
Reply

Posted: Jun 10th 2006 9:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Are you actually serious Aaron? I think you'll find we're all big Nintendorks as well. But I guess you're right, thanks for the advice. We'll get on that right away ... right after I post some more immature shit.
Reply

Posted: Jun 11th 2006 8:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
OMG! Nintendo Monopoly? What's next? Let me guess... Nintendo Duck Duck Goose? I can see it now..." Mario, Mario, Mario, LUIGI!" Or "Link, Link, Link, GANON!" Oh, the world must be ending.... ¬_¬
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2006 3:42AM noahsaiah said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@43, 45

cmon guys play nice...everybody needs some light hearted posts every now and then other wise joystiq would be another ign, gamespot. (as in the very sterile approach to gaming)
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2006 9:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So tell me AGAIN WHY WE'RE BUYING AND SELLING PEOPLE, I mean I want a night out with Zelda as much as the next guy (...kidding...) but seriously, dont do dumb crap like that. And why is there no Samus figurine and 2 Zelda figurines? NO ONE, NO ONE cares about Link's boots! And aren't there usually more then 6 players (I don;t know, I'm asking) and who actually started monopoly, USAopoly or Hasbro?
Reply

Posted: Jun 12th 2006 10:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And a Microsoft version... they have no games worth mentioning except maybe Halo, it'll be "Microsoft Edition: Halo Collector's Edition" with a few extras thrown in to make it seem like it's worth something...
Reply

Posted: Jun 23rd 2006 9:54AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
maybe park lane is the lesser mario bro... the legendary LUIGI who everyone should love? did no-one think of that? =( luigi rocks :) i wish there was a shroom instead of link's boots... BORING :(
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW