| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (13)

Posted: Jun 28th 2006 12:18PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is a great looking game and there is tons to do but it's incredibly simplistic. Sacred had far more features (many characters, different storylines, horses, combos, buildings you could enter etc) and that was two years ago. This is a fun game if you like hack-n-slash RPG's but it's very shallow. Still enjoyed it anyway.
Reply

Posted: Jun 28th 2006 12:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think its simplicity is a strength and not a weakness. Titan Quest has taken what's proven to work and polished it instead of making strange changes in the name of "innovation". It didn't set out to revolutionize the genre, but gave us more of the high quality-side that we've been wanting; we've been getting bombed with the poor quality-side for too long now. Excellent first game, Iron Lore Entertainment.
Reply

Posted: Jun 28th 2006 12:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"they single-handedly invented the hack and slash RPG"

What?? Diablo was basically just a dumbed-down, clickified version of NetHack, a game that has existed since the early eighties. Besides that, there had been dozens of other roguelikes and similar games.
Reply

Posted: Jun 28th 2006 1:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As much as I love Diablo, you can't say with a straight face that it invented the hack and slash RPG. I vaguely seem to recall playing Rogue, Nethack, and other ASCII graphics hack-n-slashers many years before Diablo came along.
Reply

Posted: Jun 28th 2006 1:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I disagree, 3 and 4. You can't compare DOS and ASCII adventures to Diablo. Regarding the sense of immersion that has become the prototype for todays action RPGs, Diablo was the originator in that regard. Why do you think all the game mags and portals compare every new hack and slash title to Diablo? Blizzard re-defined, if not defined, the genre, and set the standard for every hack and slash title to come.
Reply

Posted: Jun 28th 2006 1:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
5: I'd agree that Diablo redefined the genre, and that it was in many ways a significant improvement over Nethack and Rogue. (I'm not sure about the immersion part, though--seeing a capital "D" in the corner of a room scared me as much as anything in Diablo.)

However, the article didn't say Diablo "redefined" the genre, it said that Diablo "single-handedly invented" hack and slash RPGs. That simply isn't true.
Reply

Posted: Jun 28th 2006 1:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why did my post get deleted? All I did was state that there are better reviews on shacknews.com, and PALGN.com.au...and my post gets deleted??
I didn't slam anyone or anything.
What's up joystiq?
Reply

Posted: Jun 28th 2006 1:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I love this game.

If you liked Diablo 2 you will like this.
Just wait a bit till you buy it becouse it had random crashes every 10 to 15 min. Read there forums allot of ppl complaining. Can't wait for them to patch it.
Reply

Posted: Jun 28th 2006 1:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There some more indepth reviews out there if anyone is interested.
The editor is a huge trump card for Titan Quest IMO. Who hasn't wanted to make their own hack N slash levels?
Check out these articles at:
shacknews.com
http://www.shacknews.com/extras/2006/062606_titanquest_1.x

PALGN
an Australian site gave it a 9/10.
http://palgn.com.au/article.php?title=Titan+Quest+Review&id=4784
Reply

Posted: Jun 28th 2006 1:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I played this game a little, I didn't find it very involving. I recommend Divine Divnity, it's a few years old but much better than the other Diablo clones that came out since like Dungeon Siege, Sacred and now this. It's open ended with an interesting story line.
Reply

Posted: Jun 28th 2006 1:52PM JHarris said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I disagree with #5, almost everything good about Diablo's gameplay other than multiplayer comes from Roguelikes. In fact, Diablo is an immeasurably weaker game because it didn't steal enough.

As for immersion... well, to hell with immersion, its overrated. I don't play computer games in order to pretend to be some generic world-saving fantasy person, and when it comes right down to it I don't think many other people do either.
Reply

Posted: Jun 28th 2006 2:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Robespierre is afraid of a letter "D"? Wuss. ;)
Reply

Posted: Jun 29th 2006 9:31AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@11

I disagree I think most people who play rpgs or in this case ARPG play it for immersion and deep story line. And the more involving/customization the game offers the more beloved it is.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW