| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (35)

Posted: Jul 9th 2006 12:01PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
terrible perspective. hardly any cars. hardly any people. fake fake fake
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2006 12:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Do you just rush to comment or something, or just ignore the article and title entirely?
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2006 12:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Idk, at the very end of the road you can't see any further.

A. The PS3 can pull off rendering much further as we've seen in many other games.

B. I don't remember GTA ever having the color of "what you cant see further", if you know what I mean, be white. Normally it just shows the road and sky but removes buildings cars and people..
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2006 12:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I dunno, #2..there was a bit of popup in the GT video at the sony pre-e3 press conference.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2006 12:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
You know what's incredible? Some little sad act spent hours, if not days perfecting this only to have it instantly dismissed by his target audience. Thank you, maker. Thmaker.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2006 12:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2006 1:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i was the one that submitted it im not sure if fake or not yet yes im PacBoy23
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2006 1:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
you know why this is fake?

because rockstar couldnt make a game look this good no matter the hardware
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2006 1:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
1.(kleger) horrible perspective? thats funny since no one ever said this was real or if it is real who says its from gameplay and not cgi or intro or something. I dont expect us to see any actual gameplay shots or real videos till after this year. We just just see all those cut scenes or stupid stuff like that which everyone seems to get excited about. Kind of like with the halo 3 trailer. It was the stupidiest thing i ever saw. I think halo 3 will be great but why would I care about some trailer when i want to see gameplay footage? Us gamers need to stop showing these companies so much excitement or a stupid trailer when most of us want to see gameplay. Maybe if we stop caring they actually will start showing off gameplay first.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2006 1:40PM Pal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Something felt strange the moment I saw the above "screenshot." I had a feeling that I've seen this before, since I browse through a lot of 3D artwork on the net (university CG major myself). I was right, first guess - 3D Blasphemy (http://www.3dblasphemy.com)!

Here's the image in question, top right: http://www.3dblasphemy.com/personal/P5.jpg

NOTE: This 3D still was made in 2004.

Conclusion: Fake!

Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2006 1:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
nice work pal!
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2006 2:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Of course, we don't know 100% for sure that this is a fake..."


It is 100% fake. It's a photograph for crying out loud.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2006 2:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
nice work linking those pal!
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2006 4:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
#12It is 100% fake. It's a photograph for crying out loud.

Um no, it's definitely CGI. Despite lots of work on the detail of the buildings, look at all the 'humans' who are are the same height/shape and are all in the same step process with their legs astride. You can also pick out the figures too easily in the distance. Also the figure on the left is quite sharp but the car right next to him is much more out of focus.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2006 4:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Who cares? There is no reason to put any thought into this. Go to a park or something. Weirdos.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2006 4:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
quoting #10 It has already been proven that its a cgwork from some university.

10. Something felt strange the moment I saw the above "screenshot." I had a feeling that I've seen this before, since I browse through a lot of 3D artwork on the net (university CG major myself). I was right, first guess - 3D Blasphemy (http://www.3dblasphemy.com)!

Here's the image in question, top right: http://www.3dblasphemy.com/personal/P5.jpg

NOTE: This 3D still was made in 2004.

Conclusion: Fake!
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2006 4:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Repeat after me: you will never, ever see a leaked screenshot of a GTA game. You never have and you never will. Take it right from the (former) horse's mouth - it's been a few years now, but I was part of the marketing machine for the GTA series up through Vice City and I know the penalties for employees who leak GTA info. They include, but are not limited to:

a) Two (or more) busted kneecaps
b) The slow, painful death of your favorite pet
c) A lawsuit
d) A poor job recommendation

Any alleged screenshot posted on a non-Rockstar site before it appears on a Rockstar site is a fake screenshot. This is a 100% universal truth.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2006 5:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
theres only two kneecaps.. how could there be more unless they busted the "only two"... then waited.. and busted them agian... but other then that.. i believe you.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2006 5:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've got GTA San Andreas on my computer and still haven't started playing it...I think this may inspire me to start
poppin' caps in some heads. :)

http://www.dslitereview.com
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2006 5:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"A. The PS3 can pull off rendering much further as we've seen in many other games" really? Which one? Can you please name at least one game? For some strange reason I never seem a PS3 running any game; that is game play that supports your comment. Please show me a link, I cant way it see what the PS3 can do.
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2006 6:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So everyone is quick to say the image posted is false, but then have no problem saying the below image is real?

http://www.3dblasphemy.com/personal/P5.jpg
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2006 6:50PM TC said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's all fake, the new GTA is set in London, as this site has exclusively revealed screenshots and storyline........


http://www.weebls-stuff.com/articles/564/gta-4-exclusive-preview
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2006 7:20PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's fake. look like some took a screen shot from the Mafia or Godfather and and put it through photo shop
Reply

Posted: Jul 9th 2006 10:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
# 22 why did you do that it is fake and that is san andreas with a modded car
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2006 12:47AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
GTA4 screenshots are the new Revolution interfaces.

Or maybe this is GTA4 running on the Nintendo RS...
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2006 4:11AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The moron driving the Jeep Wrangler parked the wrong way on a one way street.

That's all I have to say.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2006 4:21AM Antibot said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"What is it with wannabe Internet celebs circulating fake pictures of games and hardware?"

Because they know it's an easy way to get their website linked on Joystiq or other blogs. Consider it viral marketing.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2006 4:32AM Antibot said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
#21,

That image isn't real. It's CG made by the guy who runs 3DBlasphemy.com. How would anyone question that? It's on his site (with no mention of GTA) and Vince said he's seen it before.

Personally, I think images like the ones Marcelo Vega and TC posted deserve mention on Joystiq, since they're obviously joking. But if someone blatently lies to get traffic, they're given more screen time. Doesn't make any sense to me.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2006 8:57AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The tip-off for me is the copyright line at the bottom left that says, "Development Screenshot 2006." But, as far as graphics go, if only this was possible with the 360 or PS3 hardware... it's a sad fact that neither console could pull this off and we have to wait for the next frickin' generation to get something that looks this pretty.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2006 9:31AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You know what's even more sad #29/Fygar? The fact that Rockstar won't even attempt to make the game look good and AGAIN reuse the GTA3 engine.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2006 11:05AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
the people that are saying it's not going to look good obviously don't know about them using the Table Tennis engine....sorry to dissapoint you, but this game will probably look incredible.
Reply

Posted: Jul 10th 2006 12:18PM vidguy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They are using the Table Tennis engine (RAGE, I think it's called), but there's a hell of a lot more to render in GTA than the relatively empty ping-pong halls.

It'll look significantly nicer than the GTA3 engine, but don't expect it to look like Table Tennis. I'm sure it'll still be behind the rest of the games in the visuals department. I said venture to say something on par with the nicer looking XBOX titles.
Reply

Posted: Jul 11th 2006 11:20AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Would you publish just any piece of crap fake screenshot you found?
Reply

Posted: Jul 20th 2006 9:12AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
''24. # 22 why did you do that it is fake and that is san andreas with a modded car''

its called irony you spoon, i myself found it rather amusing.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW