| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (13)

Posted: Jul 27th 2006 5:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well if i recall well the only time that Ati was owning Nvidia, was when Nvidia released the crappie Geforce 5 serie.

Because since then the Geforce 6 GPUs were a great success and the Geforce 7 serie are kick ass GPUs.
Reply

Posted: Jul 27th 2006 6:02PM spasewalkr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
way to stick it to the man! nice!
Reply

Posted: Jul 27th 2006 6:02PM Fuzz said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
One of the added benefits here is that, eventually, ATI GPU's will be made at AMD fabs, which brings more control to the process, quicker revisions and smaller, more advanced fabrication processes that are unafordable, or unavailable from fabs like TSMC where ATI currecntly gets the GPU's manufactured. This will bring cost savings, and potentially a huge advantage in technology.

It will also allow better integration of the entire platform, brininging lower cost machines with more graphical horsepower to handle Vista in an integrated package. Not helpful for gamers, but good for everone else.

Reply

Posted: Jul 27th 2006 6:28PM epobirs said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
AMD isn't getting anything from ATI it couldn't get for far less cost from acquisitions of smaller companies. The big difference is that ATI brings a lot of positive revenue with them while fulfilling those other needs. The merger will not be allowed to interfere with the ongoing revenue from those products.
Reply

Posted: Jul 27th 2006 6:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's an awesome response Ludwig. Witty :)
Reply

Posted: Jul 27th 2006 7:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
ATI makes piece of shit GPUs (I've had two of them, not including my 360 and my future Wii purchase), so who cares if they wanna cat-fight? Anyway, I doubt intel will want to give a hand to AMD by allowing ATI GPUs to be sitting next to an intel processor.

What could end up happening is that people will have to choose either an AMD CPU and ATI GPU, or an Intel and nVidia (if they reach an agreement); and frankly, even if AMD makes good CPUs, I'm wouldn't sacrifice having a good GPU like that of nVidia's in exchange for that of ATI's.

Besides, what makes ATI think nVidia can't make an alliance too?
Reply

Posted: Jul 28th 2006 1:27AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Your just all silly pretending you understand the workings of a computer while saying Nvidia is anymore than a piece of crap. If you want a good video card go with ATI. Granted they have had downfalls like the 9800xt but all in all even a piece of tin foil is better than Nvidia. With ATI and AMD together maybe finally computers will advance without dumbass Intel and Nvidia making things slower. Maybe Microsoft will even subcome to Linux...though I hope that doesnt happen just for the sake of my cureer
Reply

Posted: Jul 28th 2006 5:39AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
and I think it's safe to say that Nvidia doesn't have much friends in the industry, to be honest ;)
Reply

Posted: Jul 28th 2006 8:36AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
NVidia are alone in the industry, they have no other manufacturing or engineering resource. That is why they have siad themselves they are the only GPU house that is totally independant (after the AMD+ATI merger).

This is going to hurt NVidia in the long run.

Reply

Posted: Jul 28th 2006 8:38AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
NVidia would be very expensive to buy (Aparently 10Billion!!) and ATI on the other hand is cheap as chips.... so it would be more difficult to merge NVidia with another engineering house...like, Intel :)
Reply

Posted: Jul 28th 2006 9:37AM duerra said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If I wanted a good video card, I would go with ATI, Tyler? Oddly enough, I have had nothing but problems with my Radeon 9700, because ATI's drivers are SO MISERABLY CRAPPY. I don't care if ATI outperforms Nvidia in lab tests - it means nothing to me if I am constantly running into problems due to crappy drivers for the card. Nvidia drivers, from what I hear, are rock solid. I've already decided that my next video card purchase will be an Nvidia card, unless ATI really turns around their driver woes.
Reply

Posted: Jul 28th 2006 11:59AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You elistist PC gamers are straight out strange.

I use ATI and Nvidia cards all the time, and have no serious problems with either. I haven't had problems with ATI drivers since Windows 98, and that was just because I was using multiple monitors.

I'd like to point out that Nvidia's drivers and software is equally as invasive as ATI's as well. Whether gaming or not!
Reply

Posted: Jul 28th 2006 12:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Forget the ATI/Intel chipset worries, the biggest worry I have would be the AMD/nVidia chipsets. I know I love mine, and can imagine a large AMD nForce audience out there. Could they possibly kick nVidia out of the AMD chipset market?
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW