| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (17)

Posted: Jul 28th 2006 7:38AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
the wii shall reinvent/rebirth/wash away the sins of the games industre sony have been slowly killing the games industre and YOU ALL DAM WELL KNOW IT SONY FANBOYS.. this is sony fans getting all jelous over the mighty wii CALL YOUR SELFS GAMERS SHAME ON YOU ALL WITH UR ANTI NINTENDO IGNORANCE.. i see nothing new or exciting in 360 or ps3 there both based on nintendos PAST wii/ds are the future of gaming LIVE WITH IT SONY GOONS

Posted: Jul 28th 2006 8:24AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
To say that the Wii will kill the gaming industry is utter insanity. Certainly, it will revolutionize the way we think about video games. It will convert people previously opposed to the idea of games to the winning team. It will open brand new doors for gamers and developers both. It just might change gaming as we know it for good. But it's not going to kill the industry. If anything, it will make it flourish even more than before.
My friends are always telling me the Wii is a bad idea. They say that third party companies will not port over games that would otherwise be "all-console" games because the control system is too different. They say developers will not want to mess with a formula that has been working for them for years. But they also said all these things about the DS. Granted, there aren't a whole lot of games out there for it yet, but the ones that are there are amazing. And next year looks AMAZING for DS games. Why would the Wii be any different?
I'm so sick of Sony and Microsoft fanboys criticizing us Nintendo geeks for things they are too dense to understand. Open your eyes, world. And brace yourselves. The Wii is coming.

Posted: Jul 28th 2006 8:37AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why are there still people, even at Wii Fanboy, who insist on saying "Nintendo Wii"? It's just Wii, you sound foolish when you say it wrong.

Posted: Jul 28th 2006 9:33AM vidguy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The Wii will likely lead the console war this generation. But rather than kill the industry, it will spawn more competition.

For years, gaming companies have been competiting in rather old arenas: who can produce the greatest graphics, who can sell the best hardware, who can come up with games that contain the most violence and sex and get away with it.

The Wii stands to create an entire new category: who can make the most interactive gaming experience.

If the Wii control scheme takes off, by the next-next generation around 2011 - 2012 (there's no way the PS3 will last 10 years like Sony is claiming), all of the consoles will have some more advanced form of motion control.

The Wii can add a new dimension to gaming, and thus will add a new layer to the gaming industry. Like the old adage suggests, the Wii will not kill the gaming industry... it will only make it stronger.

Posted: Jul 28th 2006 11:14AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That image macro is the shizz-nit!

Posted: Jul 28th 2006 11:32AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Like many others have said, the Wii won't (can't) kill the gaming industry. I remember when people were saying the same thing about the DS. Well look at it now!

I'm not gonna say the Wii will dominate the gaming industry, but it will open a new road for gaming. It will destroy that old stereotype of gamers. But most of all, the Wii will start off the new technology that we will see in this new millenium.



Ladies and Gentlemen, a revolution is comming and it's name is Wii.

Posted: Jul 28th 2006 1:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If there is one thing Nintendo knows, that's the game industry. And Nintendo doesn't want to kill it, they have said time and time again that they want it to grow.

And the Wii is designed to do just that - get fresh meat into the industry. The same idea was behind the DS.

The DS has proved (so far) that this tactic will work. My significant-other was very intimidated by videogames and only played things like DinerDash(a silly little flash game) and the occasional game like Luigi's Mansion, since we got the DS she has been all over thing, can’t wait to introduced to Castalvania! It's pretty sad when she rivals me in play time on games.

Now that I've show her my...err.. the Wii she's quite excited to get. There is a first time for everything.

Now, if only Microsoft would come out with a game that would make me buy the 360. another Crimson Sky (with full blown multiplayer) maybe… just maybe.

Posted: Jul 28th 2006 2:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I guess the thing that people forget is that once someone is into gaming it doesn't mean that they can't migrate to other consoles and brands. Otherwise, companies like Microsoft and Sony would have hardly anyone playing their machines and Nintendo would have sold 100 million Gamecubes, and we all know that didn't happen.

Posted: Jul 28th 2006 6:27PM elmer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If third parties are uniformly unable to keep up with real innovations in gaming that consumers are begging for, then they don't deserve to do well. That's the essence of a free market economy.

Moreover, while Nintendo dominate Nintendo systems, I'd say it's more to do with them being good at their jobs, rather than actively edging competition out (at least now it is).

Nintendo is the least of 3 evils. I'd rather they were dominating, just as they did when they last resqued us from the ahes

Posted: Jul 29th 2006 2:41AM Duscrom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I kinda agree with the article. Dominant Nintendo could be very bad for the industry. Games have come so far towards being an art form, Telling great narritives, creating worlds with such depth. Nintendo Is the exact oppisate. That's why Silicon Knights left them. Nintendo is all about simplistic gameplay. All gameplay, no purpose. More Wii Sports and Brain Age and Cooking Mama. No more MGS, or GTA, or Gran Torusimo. Nothing for the Hardcore.

Sure Nintendo dominated the industry 10 years ago, but the industry was all about simple games then. It had to be. Paper Mario will be your "Deep" story line. All games will go back to being about a princess getting kidnapped again. It's like if Disney took over the movie industry.

Sony grew up the industry. Sony made it for adults. It's like with the Nintendo DS. There are no DS RPGs worth playing. There are no Fighters or action games worth playing. They all cater to Nastalgia or they are quirky silly games. And while those are good in modertation... there is nothing but an empty feeling left for anyone who wants more.

Nintendo is doing a good thing with making something different and new. But if they dominate the industry, there is alot of progress that will die. Innovations like Xbox Live, Deep narritives, Worlds that are ALIVE.

Posted: Jul 29th 2006 2:40PM vidguy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You have a point regarding Nintendo's first party gaming (although they are expanding out into some other genres - see Disaster: Day of Crisis and Project H.A.M.M.E.R.), but the thing is, if Nintendo is the best selling console, it will be flooded by third party games.

You'll have your 'hardcore' racing games and FPS and RPGs. Nintendo is attempting to make a FREE service similar to XBOX LIVE, and their Virtual Console is likely to dominate XBLA, so you won't be missing those.

You talk about innovations like Nintendo couldn't emulate them and make them apart of their consoles. Hell, other companies have been borrowing Nintendo's innovations for years. Nintendo is due to return the favor.

Posted: Aug 1st 2006 6:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Duscrom: You are a fucking tool. You are a walking stereotype of the Nintendo hater that only likes "mature games"

Nintendo does make "deep" stories. Fire Emblem, Trace Memory, Hotel Dusk room 215. But what do Sony or Microsoft make? Certainly not Final Fantasy or Metal Gear. Dark Chronicle is no more "deep" than Zelda and Halo is no more deep than Metroid.

Why should Sony be given credit for 3rd party games?

And why should the Nintendo of old headed by Hiroshi Yamauchi, a batshit loco business man, be compared to Nintendo today headed by Satoru Iwata. A developer who understands developers needs and is quite visibly making an effort to connect with them.

By the way, learn how to spell "nostalgia."

Posted: Oct 12th 2006 8:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@10 - "Nothing for the hardcore" Are you serious?

Zelda, Metroid, Call of Duty 3, Red Steel. I think those are pretty hardcore. Sure, franchises like GTA would be nice, but that's just a matter of time (Assuming it's not exclusive)

Posted: Oct 12th 2006 8:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm almost tempted to beilive this is satire... Who would seriously refer to women playing games as "Barbarians"

Posted: Oct 20th 2006 4:23AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think people are afraid of change, I think they are afraid of the revolution, of this evolution! Now people, can I get an AMEN!...Wii will dominate! Viva la revolution!

Posted: Oct 20th 2006 4:25AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh yeah, I forgot this at the end....BYAAAH!!!

Posted: Apr 27th 2007 7:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The Wii is great, especially for new gamers. More experience gamers love it, too.

I have a hard time believing it will hold the interest of the "hardcore" however. So far, it seems that when Wii Sports gets old, you're done. We played it non-stop for a month and then we went back to the Xbox 360. We'll play the PS3 when it gets games as well.

I really want to play Metroid. But when I'm done with that...I'm not sure what else to look forward to. It was the same thing with the DS for me. I guess we'll need to see what games we get before we'll know anything.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW