| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (27)

Posted: Aug 2nd 2006 3:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
cause "Games for Windows: The Official Magazine" just rolls right off the tongue, doesnt it?
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2006 3:16PM einhanderkiller said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Aw, damn.

Computer Gaming World just recently became my favorite magazine.
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2006 3:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As a diehard (I'm just guessing) mac addict yourself, do you feel this rebranding is a metaphorical punch in the gut or could you care less?
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2006 3:19PM JoshMilewski said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Damn, now I know I won't be reading this anymore. Looks like it's PC Gamer all the way. ~_~

So what happens to Ziff-Davis' other magazines, like EGM? (if it's in the press release, I didn't read it yet)
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2006 3:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Awesome. This makes me like microsoft even more.
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2006 3:29PM epobirs said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's been a very, very long time since CGW needed to provide any platform info alongside a review, just how much PC was minimally needed and how much was recommended, so it isn't any great change. Back in the day you could have reviews for Apple II, Atari 800, C-64, PC, and some shortlived others in a single issue.

I doubt Mac adherents will feel any difference. Notable new games that originate on the Mac are so few and far between they can hardly complain if many issues pass without a Mac product review. Most blame Apple's atitude toward gaming more than anything else. The Mac sees a filtered selection of ports from the PC that make the average quality level quite high since turkeys are less likely to make the jump.

That, at least, is some compensation.
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2006 3:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is a pretty cunning plan.

Let's say, for example, Windows Vista false-starts (Hey, ya never know ;-)) or Linux gaming gets somewhat better (in that cedega or native games start appearing more). Now CGW, even though now they don't really cover other OS's, can't do linux or OSX gaming, only Windows games.

Now this is most likely NOT the reason why this was done, not even close, but still worth noteing.

PS. Cedega + Half Life 2 + Kubuntu AMD64 = Gaming bliss
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2006 3:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
with the stopage of a number rating on the reviewed games I planed onletting my subscription laps anyway. Never understood what the big deal was to have an artical AND and rating.
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2006 3:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report

Just like crappy SCEA games got great reviews in OPM, I have a feeling MS GameStudios will receive the same in the GFW mag.

All they need now is John C. Dvorak writing for them.
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2006 4:07PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Many SCEA games get crappy reviews in OPM... Reviews aren't the problem though. I find that making CGW PC exclusive is not right. Congrats Microsoft for screwing up a good magazine.
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2006 4:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think what bothers ME the most about the change IS the brand name issue. Before, it was (mostly) objective in their reviews of games, but now I am forced to wonder if first-party Microsoft games will be getting a stronger push in the new magazine.

Branding a magazine normally just means to me that the reviews get a lot less objective and a lot more 'paid for by the company that brands the magazine.'

Good luck to them, hopefully they don't destroy the staff.
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2006 4:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What? CGW covers something besides PC games?? I never noticed... Who cares! It is basically a PC magazine anyways.
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2006 4:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ #6

That's their plan. [:
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2006 4:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i'm subscribed to this mag and that kinda ticks me off. most people say that vista isn't as good as they want you to think, and its going to be a resource hog once the final version comes out. plus with Ubuntu linux gaining huge amounts of success in the linux world, windows is doing everything they can to stay on top of there monopoly. i wish some gaming developers would put games out on linux so that windows actually had to truly make itself better, than other wise just saying if you want to play the new games that force you to use directx 10 then you have to switch to vista.

i don't think any mag like this should be focused on a company that already has a monopoly.
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2006 4:38PM ill trooper said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Ziff Davis will serve as the independent editorial voice for Microsoft's Games for Windows initiative."

Huh? Magazine Ownzored! Gates FTW!

Mac game market share, Windows dominance in the gaming field, 'always been a PC magazine anyways..." That's not the 'issue,' so to speak. The issue is: Why put 'Windows' in the name of the magazine?

I'm wondering: Should readers get ready for a spoon-fed stream of upbeat Microsoft advertorial? 'Nintendo Power' is never going to tell you if a game falls flat... Can this magazine actually remain 'independant?' Is anything truly 'negative' or critical going to be publsihed?

I pity the magazine that opts to put another company's trademark in their own... And logo, including '®'! (the 'registered' R if that doesn't show up in my post) in their own logo. Way to look like a little bitch!
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2006 4:48PM JoshMilewski said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"'Nintendo Power' is never going to tell you if a game falls flat..."

Huh?
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2006 5:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
and another gaming mag loses its soul.

~HotShotX
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2006 5:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Did you also know that in the past 2 issues of Computer Gaming World they took out their Star Rating system to a no rating system at all. Now they add up all the scores from different reviews at the end of their article.

Hello PC Gamer Magazine.
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2006 5:34PM CaptainRon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh man not again. Microshaft tried a onesided mag already with OXM and its so biased i actually thought Tao Feng was a good game. The whole 2 games that are Vista exclusive coulda easily been covered in CGW. Here they go force feeding us more MS BS. Hello PC Gamer and Linux. One because its a better magazine anyway and the other......just out of spite >:)
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2006 5:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's like 99% of all PC games runs on Windows anyway, so I guess they are just being honest about what they're writing about. But that name just made it sounds like a part of Microsoft, which kills any credibility they have left. Who reads gaming mags anyway; everyone get their news online nowdays.
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2006 6:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Is this connected at all to Ziff Davis's recent financial troubles?
http://kotaku.com/gaming/top/1up-egm-other-zds-for-sale-190928.php

Any way you add it up this is sucky news. It's an awful title for a mag, and it's an obnoxious jab at Mac and Linux gamers. This might just be the first in a long line of "bad news" stories regarding the 1UP network of sites and mags. Here's hoping I'm wrong.
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2006 8:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Makes me wonder how many years off Microsoft is from a rival website to gamespy/gamespot.
Reply

Posted: Aug 2nd 2006 8:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Isn't it a bit too late to revive interest in computer games? These companies don't seem to give a shit about quality PC games anymore, as they are content to release buggy, half completed games and expect everyone to wait 6 months for an update(I'm looking at YOU Lucasarts).
Reply

Posted: Aug 3rd 2006 12:02AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If Billy Gates is to be believed a major push of the PC as a gaming platform is in the works; the boxes uniformly redesgined, new displays labeled easily for even non-pc gamers to recognize, and Vista w/ the promise of DX-10.

I wouldn't be too worried about this, if Billy really wants to reinvigorate the PC this move is just another way of creating a brand identity that will hopefully be as farmiliar to non PC users as PS3, Xbox, and Nintendo eventually.

I think this is actually good news but we all can't help and feel the loss of a mag which we've been reading for many years.

Rock on Green and Co.
Reply

Posted: Aug 4th 2006 11:03AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, well, well. Here I was thinking that CGW went down the tubes when Johnny Wilson left. I had no idea! The irony is, I had just started to like their mag again. Their whole 'no scores' policy made me think that they were going to be returning to their old review policies, where hard-hitting, in-depth content was what was central to their reviews, rather than fluff and sophmoric humor. But now they've gone and ruined all the faith I had in their magazine. To say they sold out is like saying Bill Gates makes money.
On the other hand, Ziff Davis has been in trouble. With the advent of the internet, gamers get their information from 1up, Gamespot and, of course, Joystiq months before it appears in magazines. No amount of print exclusives and pretty pictures can substitute timely information and articles that are not (visibly) biased by ad buys. (Well, for the most part, anyway) So the question is, what would I rather see? CGW continue, with ostensibly no pressure from MS on their editorial content, or the magazine disappearing completely? Would the same talent that made up the publication find homes elsewhere? Would they be able to provide us with the same level of games journalism if they were under another editorial chain of command? Would Gamespot or PC Gamer snap them up and use them to their fullest potential? Maybe, maybe not.
At the very least, we can't blame Jeff Green or the people at CGW (entirely) for this shift. ZD was long mulling over what to do with their unprofitable publications, and slapping a big ol' MS logo to the front of every issue, while perhaps not the best move they could have made, was certainly one the did with little or no input by the actual staff of the magazine. One could even argue that they have a tradition of corporate branding, (OPM, for instance. Heck, when PC magazine was first published, PC was an IBM brand name) and those magazines still have high publication numbers. Time will tell how much sway MS will have over the content of the magazine, but I guess all I have to say is: it's a good thing I didn't have to pay for my subscription. ( http://www.kotaku.com/gaming/egm/free-1-year-subscriptions-to-gaming-mags-175323.php )
Reply

Posted: Sep 5th 2006 12:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I actually ....cried, err, wept when I first heard this. CGW was the ONLY place where I could find completley unbiased reviews and gaming news. Also the level of writing in the magazine was the best I've ever seen. Which may constitute why it had so many (or so few, by comparison?) readers. If anybody knows where I can find this level of writing and unbiased reviews, please email me at paladinyann@yahoo.com
Reply

Posted: Oct 23rd 2006 5:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow, now we can have biased articles pushing microsoft and their products, great.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW