| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (17)

Posted: Aug 26th 2006 10:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I lol'd...at the Joystiq joke about IGN not knowing there are numbers less than 6.8, not so much on the Penny-Arcade thing.
Reply

Posted: Aug 27th 2006 12:07AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
transcribing a comic? scintillating.
Reply

Posted: Aug 27th 2006 1:17AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is major bull about IGN. Have you guys actually LOOKED at the scores? Go have a look at all the DS, PS2, Xbox, and PSP review score list. This whole "reviewers are paid" bullshit about IGN and Gamespot is just that, bullshit. Read the reviews, they are quite accurate. Video game reviews are known to be more objective than book or movie reviews. If the controls suck, there's no other way to see it, if the graphics are ugly, they are ugly, if the game is too short, it's too short.
Reply

Posted: Aug 27th 2006 1:52AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The problem is phl that an average score is 7 on a scale out of ten. Then there are the hidden connotationsa game scoring less than 7 is unplayable. While they never actually say this, it is implied by their system. I am the only person who has at some point been under the impression that a title receiving a score lower than 7 isnt worth looking at.
Reply

Posted: Aug 27th 2006 1:59AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
must apologize its 6am here and i havent slept, it appears my writing is betraying this fact.

But in addition there is also the fact that peoples difference in tastes ensures that however qualified the journalists over at ign and gamespot are their reviews will not be 100% accurate for everybody. There are still people out there that will find the game to be better or worse than the review suggests
Reply

Posted: Aug 27th 2006 2:29AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Your talking about the heart ... well I got most of this on video and posted it to YouTube .... the things that went on with the cartoon where awsome ... of course the things that are in this video I am sure will not be on the final comic ... enjoy and please feel free to put comments on the other PAX Videos I posted ... of course I will post more videos through out the weekend so Enjoy :D
Reply

Posted: Aug 27th 2006 3:19AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The URL is: http://youtube.com/view_play_list?p=BF66F4C8DFCF6D2F

that is where you can find all the PAX related videos that I will be taking :)
Reply

Posted: Aug 27th 2006 3:28AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh good lord...I swear ANYONE who even implies that IGN (I don't read Gamespot b/c I can't stand their web layout) is biased and is "paid off"...is a complete moron. Next thing you're going to tell me that Hurricane Katrina was created by some giant man-made machine.
Reply

Posted: Aug 27th 2006 5:08AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No, IGN isn't baised by being paid, they just hate anything that isn't first party.
Reply

Posted: Aug 27th 2006 5:41AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yea...right. That about as ridiculous as those saying they are paid off.
Reply

Posted: Aug 27th 2006 9:34AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Quote from above: "Video game reviews are known to be more objective than book or movie reviews."

huh? wha... really? Known by who? I'm sure you have some quantitative data to back up that statement. All reviews are completely subjective! Just because they use personal criteria to base their reviews on does not mean they are suddenly objective.

You points on why game reviewing is objective carry over to movies and books making your point moot: "If dialogue sucks, it's obvious. If there is terrible cinematography, it's obvious. If the editing is hideous, you can't miss it. If the special effects look heinous, it sucks."

Except ... all those things are subjective ...

Reply

Posted: Aug 27th 2006 10:33AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Maybe, just maybe, IGN reviewers aren't as picky as us, because they can get to play more games? Frankly, I'd consider the range 0-10 as: 0 = unplayable, period. 5 = playable. 10 = OMG FUN. and the rest in between. Naturally, we'd want games that are fun, so we'd look for games above 7.5. If you want a score range in which 5 is average in the fun factor, then where yould you put a game that is both not fun and not playable? (as opposed to playable but not fun)
Reply

Posted: Aug 27th 2006 1:19PM chrisgrant said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thanks for explaining the joke to everyone, guys.

Everyone else: they use a scale of 1-10, but grade using the American school system's inscrutable scale where a ~7 is average, despite not being the mathematical average of 1-10. There is a long standing internet joke that 6.8 is their lowest score when, logic would indicate, 0 should be their lowest score.
Reply

Posted: Aug 27th 2006 6:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Its Wednesday comic, not Monday. It was going to be Mondays, but they said Monday will be the final to their 'dead rising' series, so they are moving it to Wednesday.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2006 3:12AM Pulov Yuran said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The wednesday comic is going to be great; completely jam packed with inside jokes for those of us who were able to attend the panel. The presence of a certain blue ball and an enchanting piece of meat are very much appreciated in my eyes.
Reply

Posted: Aug 28th 2006 9:40AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
though gaming reviews can be objective, mentioning bad graphics, bad controls, etc, one thing that isnt objective is wether or not those negatives get in the way of the game. on more than one occasion ign has said that a game wasnt playable because of one problem or another, but i found it to be just fun, and not be inhibited by the issues. game reviews are still just opinions and nothing more.
Reply

Posted: Aug 29th 2006 2:01AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
-->"game reviews are still just opinions and nothing more."

If only the people who complained saying IGN, EGM, etc would be smart enough to realize that and not take their opinions as being biased or act as if it is a personal attack.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW