
Great news has just landed for many old-school gamers: Tecmo has pledged "aggressive" support for the Wii's Virtual Console. For those of us who used to have their own Tecmo Bowl leagues -- complete with individual player and team stats scribbled on notebook paper -- this is a very tasty morsel to pass before our eyes.
Besides side-scrolling football addicts, this could also prove to be a big seller for original Ninja Gaiden fans. The news was part of a financial report that outlined other facts such as a "worldwide simultaneous launch for Dead or Alive Xtreme 2 and a promise to tackle new titles, with Wii's Super Swing Golf Pangya given as an example."



















(Page 1) Reader Comments
What could sony or microsoft possibly do to compete against that?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Or they could just use the Tecmo Super Bowl engine w/o NFL teams, trademarks, and players. Hopefully, they do that instead. Tecmo Super Bowl was far superior gameplaying wise even though it was super cool back then because it was only the few video games with both real NFL teams and players.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
so you mean to say that you are going to spend some 250 dollars because you want to play a 17 year old game? Oh I forgot you also have to buy this game too.
How about an emulator? Its a new comp app that lets you play old games for free, i know i just heard of it too, I hear good things
Screw the wii
Reply
Microsoft seems to have certain 'requirements' to be a part of Xbox live. It's not just a matter of emulating the old game, they're seeking some new content, options, online multipler capability, or new graphics.
I suspect Nintendo is taking a different approach and saying, hey we just want the 'classic' game as is.
Reply
Imagine the shock that would cause.
Reply
Nintendo has secured so many VC games because most of them are going to be from Nintendo. Sega, Hudson, and now Tecmo are the only companies pledging support right now, and they haven't said exactly how many games will be there. Do you have a source for Namco's commitment to VC? I'm sure they'll have their arcade stuff, since they re-release old games all the time and they've always been close with Nintendo, but I haven't heard anything official from them.
Xbox Live Arcade showed a lot of old school games at E3. Although most have been released dozens of times by now. Namco Museum games come to mind.
Reply
Reply
Reply
you really like living up to your name dont you? before you make statements like that please be ready to back it up. Now Im no lawyer or hyper mutant chicken but roms are NOT illegal if you own the original game. And im pretty sure 99% of the guys that want to buy tecmo bowl for the wii, bought the game and still have it in a box somewhere. Your next point is that nintendo might make these games dirt cheap, and if i know nintendo they wont be. Then you make finding roms to be the hardest thing in the world. Im surprised you didnt add this, "first you have to get up and go to the computer and touch the power button and wait for the os to boot up and then you have to click your profile and then you have to move your mouse till you find your web browser and then you have to double click." Heres what i do, go to google, type roms, and boom 30 sites pop up.
if i get a wii it will be for the exclusive NOT for something i can already get for free, thank you very much.
Reply
Otherwise, we're going with the fake rosters, which is cool as long as we're using the old rosters, and my '84 Dolphins are still in the game.
Reply
http://www.gamespot.com/ds/puzzle/snkvscapcomcardfightersds/news.html?sid=6148756
However, to correct my above comment, Hudson has said they'll have 100 games on VC.
http://www.nintendowiifanboy.com/2006/05/12/hudson-promises-100-games-for-virtual-console/
@reguy,
Roms are, in most cases, illegal. You can never download roms from the internet, even if you own a copy of the game. You are allowed to make a backup copy of a game you own, but it is non-transferable. Plus, putting someone else's game on a website to download is always illegal.
Nintendo has every right in the world to charge us for these games, and they can charge as much as they want. But they're not stupid. They'll charge what they expect us to play. Even with all the complaints about over-charging on the classic NES GBA games, people still baught them. They'll charge about what we'll pay for, or else they won't sell and no one wins.
Reply
Reply
playing emulators on PC just isnt the same if you dont have a gamepad. Thats why I just play it on my Xbox 1
shhhhhhhhh.
Reply
Reply
Please change your name to re-tarded-guy. The vast majority of people do not still own copies of Tecmo Bowl.
Plus guess what? Instead of being hunched in front of a monitor, some people like to *GASP* socialize and play multiplayer games with others face-to-face.
Reply
Reply
Nootau, Nintendo and Microsoft are pursuing different product goals. Nintendo is replicating the experience of old platforms while Microsoft is seeking revivalsof old classics with new features, especially online multiplayer.
Of the two, Nintendo has the easier task. It already owns three major platforms, the NES, the SNES, and the N64, that between them represent a combined library in the thousands of unique titles. The first party products for those platforms that Nintendo owns outright would make a substantial offering. From there it is easy to attract support from companies that own games that also ran on those platforms. Unless they have some objections to how Nintendo structures things, they have little more to do than sit back and collect the payments sales of games whose development costs were paid off many years ago.
Emulating the NES and SNES is trivial. It's been done to perfection on far lesser hardware than the Wii, even at the most conservative of estimated specs for that machine. The N64 is a bit harder but still very doable, especially with full access to all the proprietary details of the chipset. Likewise, the Sega Genesis and TurboGrafx and very easy emulation targets for a modern system. Once licenses to each of those platforms are obtained from Sega and NEC/Hudson, the rest is pretty easy. It's likely both companies granted the licenses at no cost for the opportunity to place their old games for sale on the service alongside Nintendo's.
For third parties it's just a matter of agreeing to contractual terms and vetting an official binary. In the case of games published on Nintendo platforms, Nintendo already has those binaries. It's just a matter of getting permission to sell the games and make payment on those sales to the IP owners. It's easy money.
Microsoft doesn't have a backlog of old console platform to draw upon and less interest in just offering the old games as is. Games on XBLA are more likely to offer modes with updated graphics as well as online features, ingame accomplishments, and other Xbox Live oriented features. The XBLA library is necessarily smaller but also features much entirely new content alongside the classics.
While Microsoft doesn't have that set of old platforms with huge libraries to draw upon, their position in the software world gives them a big advantage in attracting very small, often first time, developers. The recently announced XNA initiative to allow amateur developers to very inexpensively create Xbox 360 games and distribute them freely via Xbox Live is something Nintendo cannot readily match.
Every company will seek to make offering that best suit their history and market position. Sony will draw upon the PS1 and PS2 in various ways. Sony make a similar offering to Microsoft by making the PS1 a semi-open platform for amateur developers to create game but without most of the limitations of the old Net Yaroze product. The resulting games could be hosted on Sony's online competitor to XBLA. Budding game developers get access to an old but serious platform and Sony gets a bunch of downloadable content for PS3 users for the small price of opening up a platform no longer worth the trouble of guarding.
That is just one possibility. Sony isn't going to sit still while the competition dominates the online console content market.
Reply
Most software companies will tell you making a copy of a game is not legal nor necessary. Just keep track of your stuff.
Reply
Reply
I do wonder how they will do the NFL license though. Honestly, though should be able to keep it if it is the original game (otherwise every game out there that isn't madden would have to be pulled off of game shelves.) The thing about that is that it means the game cannot in anyway be updated or it makes it a new game... playing through the internet by the Wii tunnelling the control for 2 players could be possible but it would have to be done through a program outside of the original game.
Reply
Reply
You're a gamer who doesnt support the industry that provides you with the games you're playing.
Having said that though, i wish i wish they have Shining Force 1 and 2 ... that would be so cool.
Reply
Reply
Todd
http://www.proxbox360.com
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I can run NES ROMS on my PSOne and PS2...and I still have the Ninja Gaiden series for the Super Nintendo. In fact, I played Super Mario 2 on my PS2 the other day. We still have our NES's and several dozen games, but it's so much nicer to play on a newer controller and not have to switch cartridges. If we ever find the Powerpad, that might be a good reason to actually use the NES (USB adapters are 'spensive).
I think N64 games will be my only interest in the Virtual Console at this point.
Reply
Reply
And yeah, I have roms up the ass for my comp, DS with flashcart, and my Palm LifeDrive.
Am I still going to buy games on the VC? Hell yes.
You can get a MAME emulator to play acracde games on your comp, why don't you go bitch at the XBLA users.
Reply
Though I wonder how it would feel now if I revsited it.
Reply