| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (8)

Posted: Sep 12th 2006 1:03PM Crono141 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You know, I thought all those people screaming old news were just asses.

But this is like the 4th post today on Joystiq I saw like last week on engadget.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not going to be like "fire the blogger" or "J0Yst!q is teh suxxor", but c'mon guys, don't you even READ engadget?
Reply

Posted: Sep 12th 2006 1:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How many posts before we have to hear about how "old" this "news" is?

As for the "keychain," if it doesn't fit in my pocket, it's not a keychain.
Reply

Posted: Sep 12th 2006 1:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Very playable I'd say, if the gameboy micro is any comparison.
Reply

Posted: Sep 12th 2006 1:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Is that a working Atari joystick in your pocket..."

"No, not really. It requires this seprate power source and cables, and if I keep carrying it on my keychain it will break."
Reply

Posted: Sep 12th 2006 2:11PM laserboyjc said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I actually sent this in last week to joystiq after seeing them for sale at Thinkgeek.com Better late than never I guess, but no reference to my tip?
Reply

Posted: Sep 12th 2006 2:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"...or are you just happy to see me?"

Had to. No, but seriously... none of this will matter to me until I can take Astrosmash, Armored Combat, and Las Vegas Blackjack & Poker with me where ever I go. Soon as I have a pocket Intellivision, I'm set.
Reply

Posted: Sep 12th 2006 2:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't visit too many "electronic-based" sites, and believe it or not I actually get my daily fill from none other then Joystiq. This article could of been posted months ago and I wouldn't of known until it was posted here.

If I haven't seen it, it's new to me.
Reply

Posted: Sep 12th 2006 3:03PM ravuya said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There was a lot of static over this device; the original designer had implemented it with the far superior "Flashback 2" Atari emulation gear, but Atari rejected his design and opted for a much cheaper design using a "Nintendo on a chip" which lacks accurate emulation.

For a bit more, check out the AtariAge thread on this topic: http://www.atariage.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=92582
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW