| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (62)

Posted: Sep 22nd 2006 9:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
First of all, #48: What Ghandi was getting at is that hurting others because they hurt you (or someone else) is wrong. It accomplishes nothing, and is only violence for violence's sake. If someone slaps you, what do you actually gain by slapping them back?

Second, #49: If you bloody well want to stop a criminal from offending again, you should probably try to talk to him and reform him. Murdering someone for that reason is barbaric. If we notice a pattern with sex offenders committing more crimes after being released from prison, then perhaps we should reexamine the parole process first.

Posted: Sep 22nd 2006 9:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I fail to see how the use of homicide as a rational solution to a problem (capital punishment) and the general acceptance of that method by the general community, could discourage murders, which are nearly all committed under the rationale that homicide will solve a problem aswell. Capital Punishment is effectively an endorsement of murder.

Posted: Sep 22nd 2006 10:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Personally I think their punishment.. should have been LIFE in prison.. locked in solitary confinement with only a cot, a toilet, and a 12" B&W TV and a broken Xbox with the entire Xbox library in the cell as well. How bout that for torture?

Posted: Sep 22nd 2006 10:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It couldn't have happened to two more worthy scumbags!!

Burn in HELL you bastards!!

Posted: Sep 23rd 2006 1:17AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
#49

I don't know how much you know about the issue, but if you looked in to all the people who have had life sentences, i am sure you would find escape from prison is not a big problem and you would realize that the death penalty has nothing to do with preventing them from escaping.

And while its true that rapists may often commit similar crimes after being released this has nothing to do with the death penalty, because they obviously didn't even get life sentences.

The death penalty is simply an inhumane practice that serves as revenge for relatives of the victims and unnessecary punishment for all who are given it.

Posted: Sep 23rd 2006 5:53AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So you think he killed his daughter on purpose? You think he was thinking "Tha fucking brat knocked over my console, now i'll kill her"? Yea he hit her twice in the face, but i doubt i really tried to kill her. He probably had some anger problemns, maybe had the shittiest day of his life and that was the last bit. Im not defending him, im just saying don't judge him as a stone cold killer unless you know him in person. The killers in first story were much worese than him and deserve a lifetime in prison for sure.

Posted: Sep 23rd 2006 7:59AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"whilst we're at it why not fly a plane into a building or 2."

You're a sick individual.

And these comments are alomost infuiatingly stupid! No one EVER deserves to die. Think about it. Is killing a murderer bringing them to justice?

NO!

It's just a way for the government to kill without geting bloody hands.

Posted: Sep 23rd 2006 9:45AM Kiron22 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I actually say the death penalty sucks, the US is still in the middle ages it seems when it comes to the law.
US if you wanna be stuck in the middle ages make it good for the rest of us and make the death penalty a little more interesting, I propose weekly gladiator battles with prisoner's on death row >>

Posted: Sep 24th 2006 1:20AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
AMD users everywhere are sickened by this. We can't believe it! What kind of a man could do that to his child? Over some dumb gaming console (that doesn't even have AMD processor inside?).

What kind of intel-loving, nvidia-using, win98-booting asshole would do such a thing?

It's a sad, sad, intel-fanboi world out there.

Posted: Sep 26th 2006 12:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think if someone makes a crime like that he'd be wanting the death penalty more than getting life in prison and having to regret it for every second of his life. Thats why executions will always have both ends happy.

@29
If this happened to your family you surely would want them to die. You'd be a coward to let the person who slaughtered your family to live, but you selfishly look at it from one perspective.

@32
Countries who run that law have actually less crimes like these than the USA does.

Posted: Dec 15th 2006 12:50PM mandarin said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dont waste tax money of keeping these guys around. Obviously they dont feel remorse.

Posted: Dec 16th 2006 11:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
One thing that a lot of you don't seem to understand is that in the American legal system "Life in Prison" never really means that you spend the rest of your life in prison. In order to actually spend the rest of your life in prison you usually have to have MULTIPLE LIFE SENTENCES or else already be extremely old. Since our prisons are so overcrowded convicts of all types are frequently let go long before their sentences are finished.

A man who murders a child for knocking a fucking video game system off a shelf is insane, and a danger to others. A man who would brutally slay six people for ANY REASON is insane, and a danger to others. These people are so dangerous that they must be placed in a situation where there is no chance that they will eventually be released into the general public to possibly do damage to others.

Right now, in America, the only way to do that is to have them put to death.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW