The population of Vana'diel shrunk by another 3,330 today after Square Enix continued their crackdown on third party tool users of Final Fantasy XI Online. Similar actions were taken by the RPG maker over the summer when they suspended or terminated 3,400 PlayOnline customer accounts for violations of the game's user agreement.While most gamers appreciate a clean playing environment, should users of tools like Windower (which allows FFXI to be played in windowed mode) be penalized for adding an aftermarket feature that Square Enix probably should have implemented in the first place? The counterpoint to this argument is the maintenance cost and man hours necessary to selectively filter out cheat mods. Casting a wider net and banning all third party tool users allows developers to spend more resources on creating new games.



















(Page 1) Reader Comments
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Yes, technically the terms of service prohibit the Windower, as they do any third-party software that modifies how FFXI works or scans its memory or network traffic, but this is not the main focus of Square-Enix's wrath, nor do they appear to have a program like Blizzard's "Warden" for automatically detecting loaded applications and DLLs on your computer. They seem to rely largely on customer complaints and server-side detection of suspicious movement.
Some feel any non-cheating enhancement to gameplay should be permitted, with each person having a different view of what constitutes cheating. Is it cheating to be able to instantly see certain battle stats of others in your party, that normally requires communication to determine? Is it cheating to have a map always up when people normally have to open it manually? Is it cheating to run a bot that would do exactly what you would do, as long as you're still near the computer? Is it cheating to modify your character to run faster as long as you don't use it in direct competition against other people? For each question, you'll get divided opinions.
When considering the slippery slope of what addons that enhance gameplay are acceptable, it's important to remember that a significant number of people are on the PS2 or Xbox 360. For them, there is no opportunity to do any of these things. (Or at least nobody has found a way.)
Unfortunately, the creator of the Windower has made use of the program less defensible by going beyond mere windowing, adding a plug-in architecture that permits other features which can give players a more tangible advantage over people not using them.
Personally, I feel that in fairness to console users, people should steer clear of anything but a vanilla windower. The windower gives PC users what console users have already: The ability to play FFXI without tying up their computer, permitting them to respond to IMs, read e-mail, or surf the web. In a game where people can often be stuck waiting for hours to get a party, forcing 100% dedication to the game just isn't practical.
Reply
Having played WoW on and off since it's debut, I strongly believe that if Blizzard banned all forms of modding to WoW, they could very possibly lose at least 25-40% of their customer base and even that figure may be too lenient.
Reply
Reply
1: WOW
2: Lineage
3: Lineage II
4: Runescape
5: FFXI
#2,3 and 4 are primarily played in asian cyber cafe's, so in North America FFXI is basically the number 2 MMORPG.
500,000 accounts. Small Community? Me thinks not.
http://www.mmogchart.com/Chart1.html
Reply
Reply
Reply
FFXI has great concept, but I dont know if I can agree with that for SE. RMTs yes they should be banned along with third party tools that wont stick with ToS (dont forget u agreed when u first register and even everytime u logon, lets not fool our selves guys).
But yes, Windower is not in any kind malicious in both practical and theoritical software, altho it might collide with ToS ("Tools not authorized by SE will result to account penalties"). On the other hand I really dont think SE has the right to lock ur computer Just-Like-That. Windows is supposed to be a multi-task platform doesn't it?
It is time for SE to reconsider, maybe someone can open e-petition about this.
Reply
I've just recently transitioned from playing on a PS2 to playing on PC. I was part of the Beta team for the PS2 version. It was a great experience, but too bad I didn't have access to a worthy PC back then. Maybe I could've attempted to raise the argument. o,O;
While I was playing on PS2, I guess I got a little spoiled by the fact that I could go online and check quests and maps and the like. It's a convenience that playing on PC takes away.
I don't understand how such a simple concept can go unwarranted. Console users have abilities that we as PC users are being deprived of, simply because of people who "cheat", be it however small or large of one.
I would be completely happy with a totally generic Windower app, but getting banned for attempting to be equal to console players... >,
Reply