| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (9)

Posted: Sep 27th 2006 7:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The sleeping dragon awakes!

What's next, world domination?

Oh...
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2006 7:14PM vidguy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't know if I want "one-machine, one-IP" again. There is a certain security (through obscurity, I suppose) afforded due to NAT. But, I could see how IPv6 would benefit online gaming's ease of use - less/almost no configuration.

Although, China? I don't want them messing with Internet2, they already have 2 Internets, the real one and the censored one their citizenry can access.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2006 8:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Great! Just what we need, the country that is the biggest censor of internet content and violater of free speech to lead the charge.. ummm, no thanks. And it's great that China is trying to provide for themselves while ditching another American product. I wish the US would ditch most of their crappy products and start becoming self sufficient, they probably wouldn't like that. I miss the 'ol Made in the USA label which has now been replaced mostly with Made in China.. boooooo
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2006 7:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
To razer, I'd like to see how the USA will function without importing cheap made in China goods.
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2006 8:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
China is changing. As long as they can keep their people controlled and have them working for slave wages, living in povery conditions then yes the US cannot compete with that. But China is changing, and those "cheap" goods are so cheap anymore.
Reply

Posted: Sep 28th 2006 4:08AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
FINALLY someone is taking to IPv6.
Although as you mentioned vidGuy, when this eventually comes up, the "security" we once had with NAT will be gone...
But it doesn't kill those hardware firewalls which are just as good!

The only gripe i have with v6 is it is going to be damn near impossible remembering IPs!
And this is coming from someone with a pretty decent memory for crap like that, obscure codes and stuff.

I still wonder what happened to v5.
Its like nobody truly knows what happened to it, a failed experiment or something...
Reply

Posted: Sep 28th 2006 10:20AM vidguy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Hunnter

What, you can remember 192.168.5.5 but not 2001:0db8:00ca:0:0:6272:1428:57ab? ;)

Yeah, going from 4,294,967,296 unique addresses to
340,282,366,920,938,463,463,374,607,431,768,211,456 unique addresses may cause some headaches. [note: these are wikis numbers, and I'm not checking 'em!]

Hardware firewalls are still good, but how many of them are going to be properly configured? What's nice is, IIRC, the objective is to keep IPv4 for private networks, so your entire internal network will still run on v4, providing NAT like I like it. I don't like putting up a device that, at the bare minimum of security, is accessible worldwide.
Reply

Posted: Sep 28th 2006 12:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hmm, SUNET (Sweden Student Network) have been running IPv6 native for the past 4 months and will be fully converted to IPv6 next month according to their site.

I was even running IPv6 as a tryout in the winter of 04.

Whats so different about their IPv6?
Reply

Posted: Sep 28th 2006 12:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Typo, SUNET = Swedish University Computer Network
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW