| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (112)

Posted: Sep 30th 2006 1:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Jack,

I have to wonder why such a self important lawyer such as yourself feels the need to post on message boards and argue with THESE people? After all you say all these people are mentally ill due to the video games. Quote “You are proof positive of how video games have occluded your mental faculty to even engage in rational thought and debate about whether what we pour into our heads has behavioral consequences.” So if you are arguing with people incapable of RATIONAL THOUGHT due to video games what does that tell us about your LOGIC and INTELLECT? Maybe you need to back away from viewing these awful games as they are apparently causing neurosis.

Now go be a good boy and prepare your worthless case.

Sorry for all the sarcasm Pac-Man made me do it.

Posted: Sep 30th 2006 5:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh, and John Bruce, from your comment number 75:
"It doesn't even ask for $600 million, so McCauley can't even get that fact straight."

Here are a fraction of the number of folks who refer to the suit being for $600 million. The search was on Google News, Advanced Search, Exact Phrase "$600 million", With All the Words "Cody". This is just a tiny fraction of what resulted:

http://www.suntimes.com/news/nation/72320,CST-NWS-donaldson26.article
http://www.cantonrep.com/index.php?ID=309981&Category=23
http://news.scotsman.com/scotland.cfm?id=1434952006
http://www.alamogordonews.com/news/ci_4407944
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060926-7838.html
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=34659
http://www.14wfie.com/Global/story.asp?S=5462020&nav=3w6o
http://www.shortnews.com/shownews.cfm?id=57251&CFID=7663950&CFTOKEN=12854440
http://www.nbc17.com/nationalnews/9936707/detail.html

Oh, and, gee, look. The TV network that owns 60 Minutes. Wonder why I would think a network that owned 60 minutes would be important to you, huh? Hmmm.....

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/09/25/ap/national/mainD8KC6QGO0.shtml

Poor, poor John Bruce. Pathetic. Just Pathetic.

nightwng2000
NW2K Software

Posted: Sep 30th 2006 5:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow video games are the blame for violence now then whats next Collectible Card Games and Spongebob freakin Squarepants?

Posted: Sep 30th 2006 5:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Jack,

Why do you keep questioning the mental capacity and efficiency of a gamers brain. Lots of games require some complex thought processes your not even capable of. And why do 99.9% of your cases involve video games. Do you just want video games eliminated because you don't understand them? Frankly I think your a babbling idiot who is as big a threat to video games as a housefly.......

Posted: Sep 30th 2006 8:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
#103,

The funny thing about Jack is that everything that Jack says about us(and says about everyone involved in the industry, like Doug Lowenstein), he's usually refering to himself, IMHO.

Posted: Oct 1st 2006 7:23AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You're pretty ballsy in cyberspace, Jackoff. Meet one of us in the softball field at 2am and try running your mouth about how stupid gamers are. The law won't protect you when it comes to "Fighting Words", and I think you've used enough of those to fill a dictionary. That's an open invitation, coward.

Posted: Oct 1st 2006 11:45AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow! A horrific story! I would have to argue that the defendant is really the victim. To have endured such abuse from those who were allegedly his caretakers is unspeakable. And to blame video games for the young boys behavior is truly laughable. People have retaliated in the past for far less heinous acts before the time of video games. Let's call a spade a spade. Unfortunately, the kid is no doubt pretty twisted after having endured the demented behavior of a very sick stepfather. Can the system save him? It is an uphill challenge. You learn what you live, right?

Posted: Oct 2nd 2006 7:58AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dennis McCauley's pimping for the video game industry, which helps provide him revenue, has now gotten pathetic. Has Dennis McCauley interviewed the psychiatrist who examined Posey for nine hours. I have. McCauley has not. Dennis thinks he's a lawyer. Thinks he's a psychiatrist, but he isn't even a staff columnist for a newspaper. He's a blogger pimp for the industry he supposedly is covering who never saw the journalistic ethics issue of filing a Bar complaint against me and not telling his readers that he had. The complaint was thrown out, as should be anything this "journalist" writes about the industry that provides him a revenue stream.

Jack Thompson

Posted: Oct 2nd 2006 9:45AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
#110 LOL. Nice try, whoever posted it

Posted: Oct 2nd 2006 2:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
with the gun control topic, it seems that the reverse happens when everyone is allowed a gun or guns are banned from looking at the facts.

Ban guns and crime rate goes up?
Reasoning based on facts: Probably mainly due to the criminals that would use guns have alternative access to them and obtain them illegally and then the average person who would be the victim of the crime would have nothing to defend with if it ever came to something like that. In other words little to no resistence.

No gun laws, everyone has access to guns?
my reasoning: Everyone has access to guns in this situation, your choice if you get one or not. Criminals still can get access legally or illegally, but the main difference is that every place has a chance of an owner having a gun. Which means always the risk of resistence or even death. That essentially cuts out all the small time criminals since, for the most part, wouldn't go after something with the risk of death especially if they dont own a gun themself.

I'm going to summerize and put it bluntly. Ban guns and it seems crime goes up cause the ones doing the violent crimes would get the guns illegally for the most part anyway. Everyone has access to a gun, then a criminal always has to analyze the risk of getting shot at and possible getting hit, which could also mean the possiblity of getting caught if they go to the hospital for treatment, or even death.

Posted: Oct 2nd 2006 5:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As Chris Rock said:
"Whatever happened to just crazy"

When some yuppie goes nuts and shoots up his office, they don't start going after pretentious modern art, wine, and, BMWs.

Posted: Oct 15th 2006 9:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
To #109

Jack would you be talking about Myers or Sosa?

http://mountainmailcountry.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=653 this one is sick. Wade Myer's comments on Kerriana’s hand (pictures in the article) is horrible.

http://mountainmailcountry.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=688

http://mountainmailcountry.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=689

http://mountainmailcountry.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=690

Or are you talking about Sosa? http://mountainmailcountry.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=716

This is a must read on how Myers tried to defraud the court with using the PCL-YV incorrectly http://mountainmailcountry.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=712

Please tell me Jack that Myers will be testifying in this trial? I would love to see MMC get another shot at this clown.

Also I am curious when exactly did Sandra contact you? Before, during or after the trial started?

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW