| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (24)

Posted: Oct 12th 2006 3:11AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Microsoft vs Hillary Clinton

That's a title match I'd pay to see.
Reply

Posted: Oct 12th 2006 3:12AM Lekko said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"see all these games on Xbox? See how they are all rated 'M'? you can lock them all out with this feature! Thereby reducing the Xbox 360 library of fun games to about 2 titles."
Reply

Posted: Oct 12th 2006 3:29AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This strikes me as pretty fucking ironic seeing as the 360 is the home to some of the most violent games to be released lately, icluding Gears of War with it's blood-spurting, torso-shredding chainsaws, and Dead Rising with it's head-smashing, stomach-disemboweling zomirificity.

And I bet they don't show clips of that shit to parents.
Reply

Posted: Oct 12th 2006 3:31AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I meant zombirificity.
Reply

Posted: Oct 12th 2006 3:52AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Haha.. it's a win win.

Teach parents into learning that the 360 can be locked up... all at the wonderful price of tricking parents into playing with the 360. I mean... look at that setup. That's way too cool for "learning" purposes.
Reply

Posted: Oct 12th 2006 4:28AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Somewhere, deep down, I'm wishing that that TV in the middle of the last shot is an oven.
Reply

Posted: Oct 12th 2006 4:04AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Only in America.. (bleh)
Reply

Posted: Oct 12th 2006 4:04AM Keithustus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Good...maybe if people start learning that if they use a 4-digit PIN to keep their 4-year-old from raping hookers, we can put Jackoff Thompson out of business.
Reply

Posted: Oct 12th 2006 4:24AM DarkTetsuya said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
lucky #7: *writes that one down* I'd write a message about how the parents are responsible for what their kids intake, but like Homer Simpson says, "Can't someone *else* do it?"
Reply

Posted: Oct 12th 2006 4:33AM aDub said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's built into every system yet most parents either don't care little timmy is playing "Mature" games,or
aren't aware of the games little timmy is playing... With the ammount of children playing online being exposed to "mature" content, maybe "educating" or getting the parents into gaming themselves isn't a bad thing.
Reply

Posted: Oct 12th 2006 5:29AM Maverick Saturn 06 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Lol, I feel sorry for the poor sods that venture onto that bus, but getting to the point, of course they are going to skip out all the violent stuff, and thats just stupid, because if parents wanted to protect thier kids from xboxlive or the games for that matter, they aren't going to be sitting at it changing pins etc, they just simply won't buy it. And how on earth is microsoft going to stop those racists, and other nitwits that use the XBL for the wrong purposes of flaming and insullting other XBL users, its already going on.

Some pursuasion that will be....
Reply

Posted: Oct 12th 2006 6:55AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I somehow feel that this campaign would have more teeth if it were backed by all three platform-holders. After all, its an industry wide problem.

On another note, I take it they wont be introducing parents to the "colourful" language and "paedo-friendly" environment that is Live and Live Vision. This also applies to the PS3 with the eye-toy and their PNP.
Reply

Posted: Oct 12th 2006 6:53AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Parental settings control Live content. If someone isn't on the kid'ss parent approved friend list, they can't communicate woth them (audio or camera).
Reply

Posted: Oct 12th 2006 7:43AM MartyCota said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"2. "see all these games on Xbox? See how they are all rated 'M'? you can lock them all out with this feature! Thereby reducing the Xbox 360 library of fun games to about 2 titles." "

Yeah Lekko, and you are exactly the type of person who feeds the Jack Thompsons of the world into thinking videogames is just about violence, which will inevitabbly take them away from everyone! Sorry that you are under 17 and if your Mommy and Daddy find out, you will be stuck with Viva Pinata and not much else!

This is a great move on M$'s part. If parents know that they can do this with the 360, they will be more inclined to buy their children this than a PS3 or a Wii (though you can do it with those systems too, they just aren't going out and showing it). It also helps M$ with any future cases because if some parent trys to sue they can honestly say, "look we went out and educated parents on this, at some point you need to parent your kid!" It is win win for MicroSoft
Reply

Posted: Oct 21st 2006 9:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think it is great! It is about time at least part of the industry cares about this. PR or no PR it is necessary to inform parents so maybe we can put a dent into the ignorance that most parents have torwards video games. The majority(not all) of these post are pretty negative. I don't see anyone with better ideas. Maybe it isn't the industry that doesn't care...
Reply

Posted: Oct 12th 2006 8:26AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i think this is great. Im not a parent, im a 20 year old gamer and i would really appreciate this if i were a parent. I wouldnt want to have to keep my kid away from all gaming. Just monitor what he plays. who he talks to and definitely no CAMERA! Id rather have my child home playing video games (monitored) rather than having to bail him out for selling drugs.
Reply

Posted: Oct 12th 2006 8:55AM Rabidkeebler said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This would probably work better if there were more "E" games on the 360. Unfortunately the 360 seems to be traveling closer to the original Xbox in ways of content than its rivals.
Reply

Posted: Oct 12th 2006 9:19AM Gimbal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Count me as another person who thinks this is a step in the right direction. I have to give Microsoft props for putting forth the effort to do this. Dispite the sarcastic nay-sayers to the contrary, this is important. It won't stop some idiots from claiming that video games are the casue of violence, but it does help parents do what the should be doing, and that is giving a crap about what their children are up to.

And if parents started acting like parents, then the burden of parenting can be lifted off the shoulders of the video game industry, or whatever other scapegoat people place societies ills on.

Someone should start a billboard campaign with a picture of a game console and the saying "This is not your child's parent...YOU ARE!" Then you can have other ones with a picture of a TV, or Jack Thompson.
Reply

Posted: Oct 12th 2006 9:37AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Just for the record, the PS2 actually had the largest percentage of its total library rated M. The Xbox wasn't the most violent console last gen, it was the PS2. The other two were, not surprisingly, Xbox in second and Gamecube in a distant third in M rated titles.

However, this is a brilliant move. If Microsoft can figure out how to create a software censor to bleep out language and erase blood on the fly, they will have easily reached a holy grail in gaming. Parents can just set the rating, and everything above it gets edited back down.
Reply

Posted: Oct 12th 2006 10:53AM Firegrl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Microsoft is trying to make parents feel all warm and fuzzy about ESRB so the parents will continue to buy games for their kids. Too bad most of the games that are any good for the 360 are bloody and violent!
Reply

Posted: Oct 12th 2006 12:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think this is a good idea. With all the hype about games out there and hte pols trying to capitalize on it, I think it is both business smart AND a good service.

I have a 12 year old and I set her up with a Child acocunt set so that she can only interact with people on her friends list and I approve the list. This also covers the camera. It was easy to set up and works well. I think it would be great if more people knew about and used the parental settings.

I get VERY tired of people bitching and moaning about how nasty it is on Live and how the camera is a pervert's wet dream when it is trivial to set thigns up so you don't have to be bothered by the jerks of the world.
Reply

Posted: Oct 12th 2006 1:01PM MartyCota said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You all know, most of the Naysayers on stuff like this are the people who aren't old enough to buy an M rated game.

Usually when you hit 18, you appreciate these kind of parental controls.
Reply

Posted: Oct 12th 2006 2:18PM Gimbal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@joe smith

You, sir, are awesome.
Reply

Posted: Oct 12th 2006 3:54PM Lekko said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Yeah Lekko, and you are exactly the type of person who feeds the Jack Thompsons of the world into thinking videogames is just about violence, which will inevitabbly take them away from everyone! Sorry that you are under 17 and if your Mommy and Daddy find out, you will be stuck with Viva Pinata and not much else!"

Thank you for backing up my own point, actually. I'm just saying that parents who are concerned about content should not have bought their kids a 360 because of the lack of quality non M rated games.

For some background: I work in rental and rent out games to a lot of people. Frequently I see kids that are about 7-12 years old comming in and picking up 360 games. The parents quickly follow, bringing games up to me and asking why they are rated M, and trying to decide if their kid can play them. On the one hand, I do applaud them for at least trying to keep an eye on the content their kid plays, on the other hand if you are concerned, why did you buy them a 360? There are few games outside of racing and sports that are not M rated. I mean, if you're worried about content, get your kid a Gamecube. you're safe with about 90% of the titles there.

As for blocking out M rated games in the system, that's pretty much useless because it lacks context. There are a TON of parents that are OK with game violence, just as long as there is no sex. The M rating does not differentiate between these two. There is a list of all the sub-categories that can explain why a game is rated M, drug use, Gambling, Violence, Explicit violence, Cartoon violence, ect. ect. If you look next to the rating on the back, it lists a few of what they found in the game.

Now it would be far more accurate if there were a checklist where parents could say, "I don't want my kid seeing violence, gambling, or Nudity... everything else is fine" and it locks the games out accordingly rather than "EVERY M TITLE!". The reason just locking out M is bad is because it is too broad, locking out most of the 360 library, which I find to be ironic.

It's a step in the right direction, but still not good enough. Also, MS shouldn't really be the company to spearhead this seeing as this feature that they are trying to advertise turns the 360 into a very limited system.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW