| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (20)

Posted: Nov 2nd 2006 12:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
In the immortal words of Cartman "I will freeze myself until it comes out. To me, it will be as if no time has passed". (Although he was waiting for a Wii). Hopefully Halo3 multiplayer won't be over-run by racist, foul-mouth 12 year olds...

Posted: Nov 2nd 2006 1:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
To hear that the 16 ONLY player system is still going to be used is a little disappointing to say the least. If you look at Resistance:FoM, it handles 40 Players, now don't get me wrong I'm a HUGE Halo 2 fan and currently have a 24 Team Battle ranking. But you have to ask yourself, would'nt a 16 vs 16 epic be a LOT COOLER?? If anyone could make this happen it would be Bungie!!

Posted: Nov 2nd 2006 1:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah that's cool and everything, but I don't enjoy Big Team Battle because it's too much stuff going on, so I would hate 40 player big team battle.

Posted: Nov 2nd 2006 1:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree with #2 - why can't there be bigger battles? The Halo universe is huge - I was hoping for PC-esque map proportions and epic battles with more vehicles and players.

Posted: Nov 2nd 2006 1:40PM Kinetic said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm guessing that they are going with 16 player to begin with, then after a month or two release a patch that will raise the bar a bit higher.

Posted: Nov 2nd 2006 1:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ Kinetic Online

Doubt it.

Posted: Nov 2nd 2006 4:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
or, guys, they want to nail the multiplayer just right because this is the last game in the trilogy. its no time to be experimenting with gameplay. dont talk about resistence having 40 players because that games gonna suck anyway. besides, this leaves bungie open to make a halo game in the future like battlefield with the focus on massive multiplay rather than the story.

Posted: Nov 2nd 2006 2:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Lots of games have claimed big multi-player numbers before they come out. Then they scale back the number or the quality of the experience.

I'd much rather play a 16 player game that works than a broken 40 player game.

Posted: Nov 2nd 2006 2:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ Brad

No Doubt, Buddy.

Posted: Nov 2nd 2006 2:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree that 16v16 would be pretty epic (if not ridiculously hectic), but as long as Xbox Live users with slow internet connections exist, there's gonna be lag. We can't even have a 4-player deathmatch of Doom over Live without massive slowdown...

...in fact, every single 360 game I have played has had lag problems at some point, and I'm on an 8-meg line; from 3v3 Double Agent, Burnout Revenge, and Battlefield 2 (which I think was 12v12).

I think we can trust that Bungie know what they're doing, especially or the end of their trilogy.

Posted: Nov 2nd 2006 2:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hopefully Halo3 multiplayer won't be over-run by racist, foul-mouth 12 year olds...


sadly, that's the largest segment of the LIVE demographic. the only thing wrong in that assessment is they're not all 12.

anyhow, as funny as the name "man cannon" is the idea of using yourself as a projectile weapon is pretty entertaining

Posted: Nov 2nd 2006 3:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Even though yes 16 vs. 16 would be epic you would still have a massive problem with team killing as well as remember playing on XB Connect when if you played with more tha tlike 8 people it would be unbreable i think that would be what a giant battle would be like. The shear number of sprites that would have to be rendered would slow the game down if the 12 players in the game that are stealing part of their connection speed from their team mate wouldnt.

Posted: Nov 2nd 2006 3:43PM ImSteevin said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
MAN CANNON FTW

Posted: Nov 2nd 2006 9:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
OMFG GUYS! it's 16 only becuase anymore would be chaos. Also this is their last game in this story arc. there are more games they are makiing including halo wars. Also quit your whining. I personnaly prefer this game not come out for another year so they have time to get out all the bugs. especially since its coming out March 7th, 2007. woops, wasnt supposed to say that...

Posted: Nov 2nd 2006 9:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
does 1up.com know something we dont as they have the release date for halo 3 as 11/01/07 so unless bungie have told them alot more than there letting on take it with a pinch of salt

Posted: Nov 5th 2006 11:37PM starwind3437 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
All of you fucking suck. The Xbox360 sucks ass. The Wii will own all you retards.

Posted: Nov 6th 2006 4:26PM starwind3437 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
All of you fucking suck. The Xbox360 sucks ass. The Wii will own all you retards.

Posted: Nov 6th 2006 4:26PM starwind3437 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
All of you fucking suck. The Xbox360 sucks ass. The Wii will own all you retards.

Posted: Nov 6th 2006 4:27PM starwind3437 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
All of you fucking suck. The Xbox360 sucks ass. The Wii will own all you retards.

Posted: Nov 6th 2006 4:27PM starwind3437 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
All of you fucking suck. The Xbox360 sucks ass. The Wii will own all you retards.

Featured Stories

Image

Now Playing: May 21-27, 2012

Posted on May 21st 2012 2:50PM

Image

Diablo 3 review: Hitting the jackpot

Posted on May 21st 2012 12:50PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW