| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (54)

Posted: Nov 15th 2006 8:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Plz, I get tired of the fanbois saying 360 is for the hardcore gamers..I say nintendo holds that spot and xbox is for the pc gamer(shooters)..Why playstion is the perfect blend of both..also there area alot of playstation brand loyal fans..I played 360 and just dont like it

Posted: Nov 15th 2006 11:55PM ZeroCorpse said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
D AVERAGE...

Yeah. Right. You played EVERY SINGLE Xbox 360 game.

Somehow I think you're basing your opinion on a small sample of what's available.

Posted: Nov 16th 2006 8:42AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
52 - the cell is inherently inept at gaming code. It's inherently perfect for high data throughput number crunching.

Until games become extremely procedural then.. no the ps3 will not be more impressive than the 360. The very infrastructure of the ps3 has been designed in a way that is poor for games, the 360 has it inversely with unified memory architecture, multiple cores that *all* have their own data access and a generation of GPU that's above (significantly, if compared to the PC variants (ie dx10 vs dx9 levels)) the ps3.

The infrastructure is not more powerful, it's less so. for games programming. By the time developers have 'cracked' the cell the ps3 (hype) will have died and GoW will be a very old title.

Posted: Nov 16th 2006 12:13PM johnlucas said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
All I got to say is that underestimating Nintendo will prove to be the competition's (and the analysts') biggest mistake.

But you know I kinda like it like that.
I love when are PROVEN
"WRONG!"

Glad I could bring a chuckle to ya, number40one.
John Lucas

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW