| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (7)

Posted: Nov 17th 2006 4:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If you don't know why all these stock options problems are coming, then you need to pick up the Wall Street Journal from time to time. Companies all over are being heavily analyzed about the timing of stock options (Apple is another one that pops to mind). It's not the accounting department's fault, it's the executives. They push for options with questionable timing to maximize their own personal wealth at the cost of the company.

I'm sure those poor souls in Accounting are working overtime.

Posted: Nov 17th 2006 4:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Keeping track of stock options is one thing, but the various valuation methods and vesting schedules can result in some complicated accounting messes. It's not quite as simple as just "counting" them as this post appears to allude to.

Sounds like they'll be fine, however, as they are waiting for a subcommittee review before putting the stamp on the envelope, so to speak.

Posted: Nov 17th 2006 4:38PM Starcade said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The threat of delisting is not major in itself. There's a bunch of reasons why you might be late. If anything, accounting rules are becoming stricter (thank you Enron!) and often companies find they need to re-state their financials or perhaps an internal or external audit turned up something that needs to be corrected. This can and may have an affect on the bottomline. Sometimes is just a matter of looking at all options before you pursue what course you're going to take.

Posted: Nov 17th 2006 4:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
its not a matter of a simple accounting error, its a scandal. i suggest you reference the multitude of articles in the journal. options are being back-dated and purposely mis-valued so as to create a lower cost basis for the person being awarded.

Posted: Nov 17th 2006 4:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As I understand it, the issue is that companies were re-valuing their executives' options when the company's stock price dropped, so that the options still had value. Pretty shady stuff, and definitely not a practice limited to the gaming industry.

Posted: Nov 17th 2006 5:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
OK, perhaps we were getting a bit too serious in the comments. It is Friday, after all. I'll man up and admit that I laughed at Snaileb's deep personal insight.

Enjoy your weekend, folks.

Posted: Nov 17th 2006 6:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah,I'll pipe in as someone who works on the operations side of a Broker/Dealer. This happens regularly enough that it's not a big deal.

However, if you own Activision stock it's something to be concerned about. This is usually an indicator that the CFO and the accounting dept are worried about what's in their report and how they've been recording options as a cost to the company. Options used to be a free-rids, which is ONE of the reasons why companies are so quick to offer them. This is an indicator that they might not have been conforming to industry standard (in particular the SEC and GAAP).

As gamers, the thing to worry about is that Activision may start rushing product out in hopes of garnering revenue at the sake of quality for their next quarter. Make sure you pay attention to reviews and other opinions before picking up a game, but it doesn't necessarily mean Activision is folding tomorrow.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW