| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (26)

Posted: Nov 20th 2006 3:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Not unless the MP graphics are 10 times better than the demo...I can't hardly look at it.

Posted: Nov 20th 2006 3:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I prefer the co-op campaign games... GoW has 2player, R6V has 4player and GRAW still has 16player. I think the only game that is going to knock GRAW out of my X360 for online gaming, will be GRAW2.

Don't get me wrong... I like all 3 as each has something to offer.

Posted: Nov 20th 2006 3:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually the thing that turned me off about rainbow six mp wasnt the graphics or the cover. The graphcis were no biggie for me and i liked the cover. But I HATED how the game played once people learned the map. I jumped into a couple of rooms where everyone including myself knew the layout fairly well and it turned into a huge camp fest of people hiding behind the chairs. No attempt at the objectives, just hide behind a blackjack table and wait for someone to run pass. Wasnt very fun and im not a casual gamer, ive been in cs clans, rainbow six on xbox, halo clans etc and so on. I just didnt find the pacing, of what seemed to be what the game would play like 3 weeks from now, very fun.

Posted: Nov 20th 2006 4:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Gears. Period.

Posted: Nov 20th 2006 4:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
simpler destruction? hell, throw Viva Pinata into the mix then as well.

Posted: Nov 20th 2006 4:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Didn't PA get paid to do a comic for Rainbow 6?

Posted: Nov 20th 2006 4:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And RB6 has no chainsaws......

Posted: Nov 20th 2006 5:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's all about preference. I was addicted to CS just like everyone else back in the day but I also enjoyed the Halo fests me n friends had. I dont think I could pick a winner per say...both are fun in their own ways.

But rite now i find myself leaning towards the gears/halo type of shooters as ppl are not as "serious" take that as u may just my opinion.

and i agree with Ayo Jube, the one shot kill games really lead to ppl just camping.

Posted: Nov 20th 2006 6:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Im just glad that we have all these options to fill our time for whatever we're in the mood for. COD3, GOW and RB6V...gotta love the 360.

Posted: Nov 20th 2006 6:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
why argue they are both great games i already have gears which is awesome and i am planning on picking up RB6 as well and heres to hoping its just as fun and addictive

Posted: Nov 20th 2006 6:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I must agree with Reo if you already have Gears why bitch. Play what you feel like at the time and enjoy the choices. Most 360 gamers would have killed for these on launch week! Where's the love for them all...

Posted: Nov 20th 2006 6:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Vegas, no contest. I beat GoW, trying to finish CoD b4 tomorrow so I can focus on the greatness that is Vegas.

Posted: Nov 20th 2006 6:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I also prefer co-op campaign games, but the problem is increasing fewer studios are entertaining us, and those remaining are starting to kill the buzz when they started charging for additional content download when it use to be a loyalty reward system. Now, I'm just an Ubi-_itch.

Posted: Nov 20th 2006 7:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah...when I went back to the Vegas demo after playing Gears, I was sad because I ended up trying to hit A to get into cover. The graphics for Gears are WAY better than Vegas so I'll be sticking with my chainsaw.

Posted: Nov 20th 2006 7:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Gears has really spoiled me. I was really really hyped up about the rainbow 6 vegas single player demo. It was a lot of fun to play and you felt badass sneaking around. The only part of the multiplayer demo that I liked was the character customization. Other than that it looked like an OGxbox game compared to Gears... the lighting is just off (isn't it on the Unreal 3 engine as well??) I also agree with Ayo Jube, the pacing just seemed super slow (way slower than GRAW, no I know why they took the cover system out of multiplayer) and not very exciting. I still might pick it up for single player and co-op.

Posted: Nov 20th 2006 7:21PM Brax0r said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
... or you could just play both.

Posted: Dec 5th 2006 1:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
graphics dont have s**t to do with how good a game is or how long it will last. Just ask DOA:X2 and GOW. they know exactly what i mean.

Posted: Nov 20th 2006 9:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm definitely going to be putting a lot more time into Rainbow Six then I will Gears.

I seriously played the demo for, about, 4 hours one night and it just didn't. stop. being. fun.

Posted: Nov 20th 2006 10:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I am absolutely loving GoW single-player and co-op, and it is by far the prettier game, but I am yet another person that spent an entire day playing Vegas multiplayer. It's just more enjoyable, and there is far more variety in the online half of the game.

As far as popularity, Rainbow Six likely won't even touch GoW. But after playing the multiplayer portions of both games, there is no doubt in my mind that Vegas wins.

Posted: Nov 20th 2006 11:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well today I got a call from EB telling me that RB6 will be in tomorrow. Guess what I did guys... I took back my already pre-owned copy of GOW (Now I know why it was pre-owned)(Graphics and that are awesome. Online sucks and it is too too short.) I have always been a fan of Rainbow (except the two mistakes of lock down and that other one ahh who cares what its called. all I know is that the demo is awesome and I'ts gonna be in my 360 tomorrow and for ever till Halo 3 comes out.

Posted: Nov 21st 2006 4:00AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I played GOW but I didn't like how it takes over a full clip to kill someone. I also didn't like how short it was and that online multiplayer is only 4 on 4. The game is just pretty and that's it. Rainbow 6 is pretty badass, I was stuck playing it for hours and that's on only one map. Yeah there's people camping out but that's why you use tactics rather then unloading a full clip on someone and not killing them. Oh and the customizing is great. Vegas wins in my opinion.

Posted: Nov 21st 2006 7:34AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't see why you cant have both and enjoy them for what they individually offer. The PA guys cant be that poor to be able to afford just one. Unless they just want some controversy to bring more people to their website and have themselves on the blogs.

Posted: Nov 21st 2006 8:48AM teknomusik said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I find Rainbow 6 boring...

Posted: Nov 21st 2006 10:01AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wait a sec, we are arguing over sex with Jessica Biel or Jessica Alba.

Jeez, play both, add in GRAW and you have Jessica Simpson.

Can't we all just play the games and frag each other in happiness.

Posted: Nov 21st 2006 10:28AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
haha, it's like peanut butter and chocolate. Yeah Gears bugs me abit with how many hits you need to take someone down with the machine guns. I think i'm gonna pick up RS soon... demo was fun


Posted: Nov 24th 2006 3:50AM purple monkey said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I prefer Gears, since camping is less rampant. I guess that's the positives of people taking a lot of bullets to die- it makes camping a lot less effective than in 1 shot 1 kill games. I want to pick up Vegas though, mainly b/c of the 4 player co-op. After getting use to the FP perspective, I'm pretty sure I'll enjoy the Vegas multi though.

It should be noted that Gears is a lot more than graphics, there is actually a good amount of strategy in there (play with/vs. an organized team in multi and you'll understand) Also, graphics DONT make the game, as long as the gameplay is solid and there is depth, it's fine. (though beautiful visuals do help justify that $400 purchase.) I get the feeling Vegas will just be a transferring of my Socom mentality, when I get used to the 1st person view, I will probably love it.

As I'm writing this, I just noticed, we are all arguing over which game is more badass out of 2 great games. I find this is a great "problem" to have, it's like choosing Cake or Ice Cream, they are both delicious. Boy are we lucky. :)

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW