The correcting of a paperwork error has led to the dismissal of a second degree murder charge filed against New Hanover County Cpl. Christopher Long who was accused of shooting and killing an unarmed teen suspected of robbing two PlayStation 3 consoles. Apparently, the grand jury foreman checked the wrong box on the indictment form, mistakenly charging Long with murder.According to his attorney, Long "based his decision [to fire] on his law enforcement training," hitting the victim in the head and shoulder after he thought he heard gunfire as authorities broke through the door to the victim's home with a battering ram. District Attorney Ben David confirmed that the other officers involved did not report hearing shots fired prior to Long's attack.
[Thanks, CCx & devian]
See also:












(Page 1) Reader Comments
Cue the Price is Right "fail" sound. Keep it up, law enforcement!
Reply
~HotShotX
Reply
Reply
Anyway, your writeup is vague enough for people to get the wrong idea.
It was a paperwork error that CAUSED charges to be filed. The grand jury never intended for charges to go forward. They checked the wrong box by mistake, crossed it out, checked the right box, initialed it, but whoever was in charge of processing the paperwork didn't get it.
Reply
Reply
America.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Some goody twoshoes filed the charges before he realized the shit storm that would come down on him. It turns out having a whole police dept pissed at you can give you a certain moral flexability. A paperwork error lets him save some face while dropping the charges.
Reply
Reply
Reply
@The milk man
Forget putting yourself in the officer's position. How about putting yourself in the parent's position? No justice. I wouldn't consider the "raid" a high-risk situation. The guy had no business being an officer.
Reply
There were THREE at the scene. Only ONE heard "shots". Only ONE fired. Only ONE killed an unarmed man and an apparently armed dog.
See? Two others WERE in his position and made a better decision.
You just don't like dogs cuz your a milk man. :P
Reply
I'm no lover of cops by any stretch of the imagination, but you make it sound like a simple thing to break down a door and barge into a house full of unknowns, where the only thing you're sure of is that there is likely someone who broke the law on the other side. Someone who's capable of anything.
So, HotShotX, Iscariote, Derbeste, let's put the question on you. You bust into the house of a suspected criminal. It's dark, you don't know you're way around, and due to the adrenaline coursing through your veins, all ambient noise is amplified 10-fold. Are you going to look for a gun that you'll probably never see until the bullet is already lodged in your brain?
Yes? That's probably why you aren't a cop. I don't like cops, but to think you can extrapolate enough information about this circumstance to deem this man a murderer from reading these tiny news snippits is just ridiculous. It must be really nice in the land of videogames where you have a bright HUD light up whenever you see an enemy, but sadly real life is a lot less forgiving. This kid should have known that before he decided to become a thief.
Reply
Reply
I don't know how you can defend that officer's actions. Unless you're happy knowing you too could be justifiably killed by an officer while unarmed in your home because you were playing a loud video game or movie that has gunfire in it.
The guy was trigger happy. How they arrived at that door is irrelevant. Awesome police work.
Reply
Maybe you enjoy reeling revolver chambers to govern your life expectancy, but smarter people in that split-second decisive moment would rather attempt to delegate the fate of their lives to gun in their own hands.
-Kye
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
You people make me sick. I'm glad -you're- not police, or the bad guys would laugh at you while pumping you full of holes as you attempt to achieve the objective of diplomacy for the stage completion. Life isn't about getting all 100 stars, gentlemen. It's hard. When you make an armed robbery, it tends to go badly for you if you're discovered.
Reply
The moral of this story is not to make any sounds when the cops break down your door. Because if you do, you are fair game. Does not matter if you have a gun or not.
If I was that police chief, the cop will be suspended, facing charges of manslaughter and upon certain conviction, terminated immediately. And if the officer should make a loud popping sound during these proceedings, he should be shot.
Don't get me wrong people, I am not supporting crime. I just think that if the perp was unarmed, he should not have been shot in his own home for WHATEVER reason during apprehension. Otherwise, the real menace here are the cops...
Reply
Posted at 11:04AM on Dec 13th 2006 by The milk man * 0 stars"
After you go to prison for killing an unarmed suspect. I'm sure you'll wish you were carried by six. Unless you relish the idea of being the victim of organic enemas from some oversized convict named Bubba. Being a former cop in prisoned would probably get you passed around like a blunt at a Snoop Dogg concert. I'd rather be dead that deal with any of that, but thats just me I guess.
Reply
Reply
If you're going to commit felonies, make certain your myspace doesn't have pictures of you holding automatic rifles. Cops tend to get a bit worked up thinking they may be entering a room with a guy and an M4.
Reply
Reply
LOL! Damn, man...I nearly did a spit-take there.
Reply
How about you actually read the entire story?
The charge was NOT theft. It was ARMED ROBBERY. There is a huge, HUGE difference.
Reply
bullets first went through door
kid unarmed
innocent until proven guilty
no weapons-related charges ever
had a lawyer who wasnt contacted re these charges
idiotic "special forces" team sent for no apparent reason other than to make themselves appear useful (they aren't)
raid conducted at night, increasing the probabilities of many seriously negative possibilities; no positives
didn't this just happen? do grand juries meet and decide shit like this so soon?
innocent until proven guilty (ah, the good old days)
Reply
Reply
He was accused of armed robbery with a blunt object. Last time I checked, blunt objects aren't guns. The officer fired 2 shots, one landing in the head.
I can imagine the "gunshot" he heard was the door they busted open slamming into the wall.
I'm not gonna say all cops are bastards, just this one.
Reply
And the comment about the parents was laughable. Don't raise armed robbers and you won't have to worry about your kids getting killed by the police. Some of these people on this board probably felt sympathy for the Oklahoma city bomber.
Reply
He only had a split second to realize if he left the victim alive, the PS3 would go into the evidence locker and not his kid...
Reply
America.
Posted at 10:46AM on Dec 13th 2006 by Iscariote"
In most states, small personal quantities of marijuana (i.e. one joint) is a cite release ticket. You pay a fine. No jail time. Possession with intent to distribute is where the big jail time comes into play.
And this wasn't murder. There was no premeditation.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Police are unionized. The chief cannot just fire them at will.
Reply
http://www.dailyrecord.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061206/UPDATES01/612060376
Reply
Reply
From your article:
"Formalizing charges originally filed against him on Oct. 6, a Morris County grand jury indicted Patrick M. O'Connor, 40, on charges of animal cruelty, possession of a knife and a baseball bat for an unlawful purpose, and unlawful possession of those weapons."
I don't see any charge for murder there.
Reply
Reply
Why would his lawyer be contacted? He hadn't been arrested yet. He hadn't asked for a lawyer. He hadn't been mirandized. Do you think cops routinely call every lawyer in town and say "hey, listen, we're going to arrest this guy, is he your client? If so, let him know we're coming."
And special forces were sent because they had reason to believe this guy was heavily armed. As mentioned, he had pictures of himself and automatic weaponry posted online.
It's a shitty situation, but for public policy reasons we're better off giving leniency to the cops, so long as they were being reasonable. The purpose of our laws is to prevent crime. Allowing cops to reasonably shoot before being shot goes a long way to this.
It's worth reminding everyone that the Supreme Court has upheld this, several times.
And worth pointing out that the grand jury is a jury of the peers, they had more facts than we did, and they found this cop's actions reasonable.
Reply