| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (35)

Posted: Dec 19th 2006 7:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I haven't had any problems with Assault Heroes Multi. Maybe I'm just lucky.
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2006 7:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Easily one of the top 5 arcade games.
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2006 7:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You guys can't be serious... And since when do you guys review games, XBLA at that?
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2006 7:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yikes, thanks for the heads-up Joystiq. I almost bought this game but will wait. Why is it that it seems to take forever for a game to be tested/certified by MS and then it comes out completely broken? And not those little "bugs" but huge problems that make parts of the game unplayable. Do they think we won't notice? I'm am so happy to see XBLA releasing original games and not retro rehashes, but these games have to work. Especially if I'm paying $10 for the thing.
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2006 7:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've never been able to get a multiplayer game past the "waiting" screen. Not in five or six tries.
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2006 8:37PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yes, this is an extremly accurate review. I bought this game sorta... blindly, thinking I would love it... But honestly it's more of a chore to play than anything. You described it well and your rating is perfect. I would be much more inclined to like it if It was cheaper, so I wouldn't feel like I wasted money on it.
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2006 9:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
great game, my fiancee and i played it all day and will probably play it over and over again, much like geometry wars!
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2006 9:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Strange, I was hooked on the demo. I never bought any other dual-stick Arcade games though, so maybe it's just new to me? Haven't bought it yet, don't have Gold, so it'd be for the single player. Maybe I'll wait until tomorrow and see how it compares with that new game, the one involving metal, guns and cars...yeaaaah.
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2006 11:15PM Mikeo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I give it an 8.8 for being something new. D=
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2006 9:54PM guises said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This looks remarkably like Iron Squad:

[Insert link to website that is now gone... I tried to find something to link here, really I did.]

An excellent game that is tragically defunct. It looks similar graphically anyway (that shot with the overhead plane is what really does it), but Iron Squad was multi-player only.
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2006 10:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No problems with coop multi player. Enjoy game very much. Do not buy many XBLA, but this one was an easy purchase.
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2006 10:45PM Twenty5 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
joystiq doesn't do reviews so don't trust them!

Just download the demo and check it yourself!
Reply

Posted: Dec 20th 2006 2:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If I do recall, IGN rated this game an 8.7.

Perhaps your being a little too harsh even if it is IGN after all.
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2006 10:47PM Starcade said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This review is pure crap. Too familiar? Dropping TWO rating points because of multiplayer?

This is why I don't come to Joystiq for game reviews.

It feels as if there was more effort placed into the style of writing this piece than playing the game.

My advice, if you enjoy action arcade shooters, play the demo and draw your own conclusions. If you don't enjoy shooters, then this probably isn't the game for you.

From my own impressions, I was quite surprised at the production values for a XBLA game, costing $10, which is three to six times cheaper than most disc-based 360 games. It is what it is. Playing single player works well. The graphics are well done. The mix of action is interesting and there's enough variety to where it does not become repetitive. I'm enjoying what I've played thus far.

Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2006 10:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm not sure what the reviewers played, but this game F'N rocks. I reminds me of the old Ikari warriors game from yester year. Mindless shooting, requiring cat-like contra skills to dodge 100 bullets without getting hit. I'm in old school heaven. I haven't tried to play co-op over live, but offline co-op is great. It's pure fun for us old schoolers!
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2006 11:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
TO: #13

Dude you are so friggin right. Granted I haven't tried playing multiplayer yet but the demo I thought was awesome. I don't even remember the last arcade game I bought but this one I just can't stop playing it(yes I just bought it). As a matter of fact the only reason why I am posting now is because I am taking a 5 minutes break to give my hands a rest.

Anyway breaks over
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2006 11:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The coop was great. My brother and I played the game out in a couple of sessions over Live. Maybe you guys just have bad luck, because I haven't heard of this issue anywhere else. I'm not a fan of most of the XBLA games, but this is one of a handful of games(UMK, Uno, Cloning Clyde) on the arcade that I have purchased. I don't regret it. It deserves an 8. You're being ridiculous w/the 5. I'd also like to point out that you're giving this game a much lower rating than any official review thus far.

http://www.gamerankings.com/htmlpages2/935488.asp

If you're on the fence about the game, try the demo and check any of these other reviews.
Reply

Posted: Dec 20th 2006 6:25AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
My friend and I tried setting up a co-op match a few times over the past few days to no avail. I finally went over to his house today and we played through the full game on his console. Final impression = fun for 30 minutes and then a bit painful. I'll likely never boot this one up again. Ikari Warriors it ain't... good review, Stiq.
Reply

Posted: Dec 20th 2006 2:52AM imadogg said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I played the trial and loved it. Might download in the future, maybe after an update if online is really a problem.
Reply

Posted: Dec 20th 2006 4:15AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow, talk about overanalyzing an arcade game. We're unlikely to remember it a year from now? Of course we are, it's only supposed to be a quick distraction, not a friggin' ICO.
Reply

Posted: Dec 20th 2006 7:06AM falcomadol said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Seriously, all you people who have "problems" with Xbox Live games and matchmaking NEED to fix your damn port forwarding on your routers.

You're screwing it up for the rest of us.

Xbox live needs TCP 88 and 3074 and UDP 3074 forwarded to your Xbox to work properly. If you don't have those ports forwarded, then you're going to be operating in a crappy, firewalled state that is a very very bad experience for you and for those playing with you.
Reply

Posted: Dec 20th 2006 7:53AM crunchymonkey said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Definitely one of my favorite arcade games. Good fast and furious fun and easy to play a quick game. I've really enjoyed playing it with my 5 year old son.
Reply

Posted: Dec 20th 2006 7:52AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I really enjoyed the demo, and grabbed the game. It is pretty much as described above: an old-school top-down shooter. If that's your thing, you'll love it. I really like to see new games on XBLA, even if they are somewhat simplistic and reminicent of older titles as this one is.
Reply

Posted: Dec 20th 2006 3:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Joystiq got the review right but the scores wrong. 8/10 (with corrected multi) and 7/10 (with broken multi).
Reply

Posted: Dec 20th 2006 10:41AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Make sure your router's firewall isn't interfering with Live. I forwarded the appropriate ports to my 360 and the NAT test went from Moderate to Open. I haven't had connection issues since.
Reply

Posted: Dec 20th 2006 11:21AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
*sigh* this is another case of people's routers not being friendly with XBL.

Are you guys forwarding your ports properly? This game (along with games like street fighter) and such, likely were not tested with people who haven't properly set up their routers to forward data out through the right ports.

You will have next to no multiplayer problems in ANY of those games if you all just took the little bit of effort required to make sure all of your ports are correctly forwarded. (well, not true, PSU and Gears of War will still have buggy chat problems)

I have emailed Microsoft a dozen times to at LEAST warn people if their settings don't say "open NAT" in the test screen, that they WILL have problems with a number of games.

Hell, I think MS shouldn't even allow you guys to get online, it should keep flashing "fix your damn routers you numbnuts" so that you don't mess up the game experience for the rest of us that have done it.

Should XBL even require this? Well, hey, you want ubiquitous voice WHILE playing? They're using different ports for the different servers. Can't be helped. So quit yer moaning, make sure your routers are set up properly. (As in, make sure when you test your connection, it says "NAT: OPEN")

Actually, joystiq, it would be nice if you could help the community out and provide this information for everyone.

I almost threw my xbox out the window with all the problems chromehounds had since I spent the better time of every night walking people through their router settings.

Does it suck? Yeah. But unfortunately, it's a necessary evil due to the way the service works. Ask Linksys to make it EASY for people to quickly make their router work on XBL. Their port forwarding page is still daunting for most users.
Reply

Posted: Dec 20th 2006 11:45AM KaneRobot said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Uno had no major multiplayer problems. Do your research.
Reply

Posted: Dec 20th 2006 12:01PM Ludwig Kietzmann said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ranked matches not working isn't a major problem? You know, the link to the article's right there.
Reply

Posted: Dec 20th 2006 12:43PM tucker973 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
First off, what is wrong with you people? Joystiq does quite a few reviews. Stop smoking crack.

Second, I'm tired of getting insulted by self-righteous nerds who just automatically assume everyone else on the planet is an idiot. I've worked in IT for years, and yes, my ports are forwarded just fine. My nat is as open as your mom's vag. This game has issues. You don't think the friendly folks in the joystiq network wouldn't TEST their connections before playing? Jesus, you must be thick.

Sure, I could see if the friend I was playing with was an idiot, but then explain why HE got a random connection but we still can't connect to each other. I repeat: this game is BROKEN. There are far, far too many people experiencing issues for this to be a simple "OPEN YOUR NAT DUMBASS" issue.

I have never experienced any problems with any other game. This is the only one. So do about two seconds reading and realize that this IS an issue before blindly responding. You're making yourselves look like morons, especially considering this is not only a widespread issue, but one that the DEVELOPER has RECOGNIZED.

http://forums.vugames.com/thread.jspa?threadID=38643&tstart=0
Reply

Posted: Dec 20th 2006 2:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Normally I think Joystiq is right on the money. But this time they are clearly playing a different game than the Assault Heroes I've been playing. Like another commenter said, you guys are overanalyzing one of the greatest Xbox Live Arcade games so far. This was the best $10 I've spent on a game ever.
Reply

Posted: Dec 20th 2006 4:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is certainly one of the better original games I've played on XBLA, and I'd probably rate it a 7 out of 10. When you lower the rating, you start entering good but not re-playable territory, and anything with a 5, to me at least, wouldn't be worth playing unless you're the dedicated fan. I don't believe that's the case Assault Heroes. This is a pretty good game.

Here are some other reviews
http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/xbox360/assaultheroes
Reply

Posted: Dec 20th 2006 4:40PM Ludwig Kietzmann said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I understand where you're coming from, but honestly, a 5/10 means it's average. One of the reasons why I refer to as scores as being "loathsome" is that the full range has been chipped down to 7-10 by certain review sites. That and, as a few commenters here have demonstrated, people just look at the score without even reading the motivation behind it.

People see the 5, not "It's important to note that Assault Heroes is still worth an 800 MS point ($10) purchase." Words are much better at explaining why you'll like or dislike a game than numbers are.
Reply

Posted: Dec 21st 2006 3:57PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I played the demo and basically breezed through it, having beaten Smash TV (not on XLBA, haven't bought it there yet, maybe I will though), no other game of this genre has yet to present such a challenge.
Geometry Wars doesn't count, different beast. This is a Smash TV clone really.
Reply

Posted: Dec 21st 2006 6:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
My brother and I are always on the look out for co-op games, and although I think 10 bucks is a bit much for a game like this, I think I'll get it for him anyway. I don't really care about the Live problems; it doesn't matter to me since we live in the same house anyway.

I still think games on XBLA and (especially) the Virtual Console are too expensive. I'd easily pay $5 for a game like this, hell I wouldn't even think twice about it. But $10 is really pushing it. And Nintendo is pushing it a lot for $5 NES games...

Though ultimately it's better than Yahoo! Games charging $25 for a game like "Diner Dash": http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=dinerdash3
Reply

Posted: Dec 21st 2006 11:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
To all the people saying "OPEN YOUR NAT", I have to say that, I HAVE the same issues with online co-op in this game and my NAT is open. My Xbox is on DMZ, but I still can't get it to work. I too agree that the multiplayer is important enough to lower the score by 2 points. We shouldn't have this problems when we're paying for the service and the game (I do enjoy Live, this is the first issue I'm having with it). My major complaint is for how long it's taking to fix this!
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW