| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (61)

Posted: Dec 20th 2006 5:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why change something that perfectly describe it's concept.

The problem doesn't come from the word "game", it comes from the people that forget what "game" truly means in our society.
Games were often considered as rituals (even in the religion way), games were used in a way to reinforce social cohesion, games were used as a way to teach youngster about the rules of life/society, games were used to improves and challenge both physical and cerebral condition.

Games have been around each and every human civilizations, having a fundamental rĂ´le.
It's only quite recently (2 centuries IMO) that this word lose the respect it deserved.

Posted: Dec 20th 2006 5:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Is there anyway to ban dave?
Seriously this is like the 4th story I've seen him tolling things up (even if he is kidding)

Posted: Dec 29th 2006 12:14AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i have the new name:
unbooks!

Posted: Dec 20th 2006 6:30PM MNeko said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Absolutely not. I'm proud that I play video games, even if individuals like Phil Harrison aren't proud to make them. Maybe the industry should work hard to change peoples' view of the term "video game", rather than thinking of a new one.

JR

Posted: Dec 20th 2006 6:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Like others have said, I think we just need to drop the "video" part. Just call them games -- it's a shorter name, and honestly, it's more accurate too. Sure, it won't change the public perception of games being for kids, but people don't always associate word games, board games, the Olympic games, etc. with children, so it seems very unlikely that the word "game" is the source of all our problems.

Quite honestly, I think the only way anyone can change this perception is by making more games aimed at an older age group. And no, I do NOT mean M rated games necessarily. Filling a game with blood and boobies doesn't make it mature, it makes it appealing to little boys. What we need are more games that cover subject matter that actually will appeal more to adults than to children. Subject matter that the average kid might even find boring. I think there is a market for that type of game -- potentially a very big market -- but few companies are willing to risk alienating the lucrative teenage male demographic.

Posted: Dec 20th 2006 6:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So this article leads us to believe the public considers things with "game" in the title to be geared more toward a younger audience?

Yeah, football games shouldn't appeal to any self respecting adult. And no adult who cares about their image would be caught dead at a baseball game, right?

I guess it IS a childish word, huh?

Posted: Jan 23rd 2007 3:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Poor confused americans.

It is, and has always been 'films' showing at the 'cinema'.

Only YOU guys, with your silver tongues that usher those dulcet tones, only you go to see 'movies' at the 'movies'. If only they had a 'couch' in there too, right?








God, how I loathe the word 'movies'.

Posted: Dec 20th 2006 10:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The problem is not the name - the millions of adult gamers 18-28 have proved that not to be a deterrent. The problem is the baby boomers being so unapologetically ignorant.

Posted: Dec 20th 2006 11:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
as i said on kotaku when they asked the same question, i have to say that the name that seems to fit with what it is would be "interactive electronic entertainment." clunky, but politically correct.

Posted: Dec 21st 2006 3:32AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
100 years ago, "movies" were considered a derogatory term that implied entertainment only suitable for children and the ignorant. The "-ie" at the end was a way of infantilizing the medium (in the same way that "Tom" gets turned into "Tommy" or "Tommie" when its in reference to a child). But we still use "movies" today, without the baggage. As more generations grow up with "videogames," the same will become true for this medium.

The problem is not the word--the problem is that young people are always more inclined to take up a new medium, while their older counterparts, already set in their ways, are less inclined to do so. When that happens, it becomes something "for kids."

I do prefer the one-word variation over "video game," though--it indicates a medium in its own right, not merely the digital variant of "games." Yes, "video" doesn't make sense, but neither do the etymological roots of many, many other words.

Posted: Dec 21st 2006 10:19AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The term "Video Game" is a legal creation to win a specific battle as to who the farther of the "video game" is (I forget just now) and what the first "video game" was (Ping-Pong). Its an abomination as Space Wars predates Ping Pong but was determined to be a Computer Game as the technology that made it was far more complex and not available in the home. However modern "Video Games" share far more in common with Space Wars than Ping Pong.

I realise this doesn't help matters, but its a personal irritation.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW