| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (15)

Posted: Jan 3rd 2007 7:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I thought I was the only one who wanted Alpha Centauri II :)
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2007 12:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Blech.

Let's hate games that tons of people liked, it'll make us look cool!

Dead Rising and Oblivion are great games - you're dropped the ball here.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2007 1:17PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You liked Just Cause but didn't like Oblivion. What's wrong with you?
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2007 1:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This list makes me scratch my head.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2007 1:24PM MosquitoControl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm just going to echo the "Just Cause but not Oblivion or Dead Rising?!" sentiment.

Just Cause was an awful game. Awful. Awful.
Oh, it was beautiful, but it was empty.

1) Combat was just holding down one button and occasionally flipping the autoaim button. Isn't autoaim a bit, err, "last-gen?"
2) Almost all the combat you did was just running at a base and hitting roadblocks.
3) Absolutely no physics on the vehicles, particularly the planes. I tended to clip trees with my wings while taking off, do a few 360 spins, then level out and resume flying as usual.
4) Rocks. Ug, the rocks. You'd be driving along then slam into a well-camouflaged boulder, ending your joyride before it begins, hindering your ability to enjoy the landscape.
5) Speaking of the landscape, you had trees, you had boulders, and that was it. Nothing to explore, nowhere to go.

Saints Row might have had the most generic setting out there, but it did combat so fantastically, had great driving, and a wide variety of mission styles. If you're going to pick one GTA clone on the 360, this would have to be it. It outclasses GTA in every way except for style and humor (where it failed miserably.)


Dead Rising was clunky, and the survivor AI blew... but you could do quite well without saving he survivors. Simple zombie killing was worth the price of admission.
Oblivion's AI wasn't near what it was hyped, but still amusing enough, even with its hysterical shortcomings. The game was too easy to break with magic, and broke itself quite often with disc-read errors, but was still pretty damn amusing when it worked.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2007 1:30PM Neebs said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I am saddened by the lack of Company of Heroes in anyone's list.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2007 1:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Dead Rising is a pretty fun game, and one of my all time favorites this year. I think is suffers from being more misunderstood than appreciated. Often the game, which is actually meticulously designed, is cited as having flaws, when it's actually purposely created that way. The most notable is the save system, which if you've played the game you'll come to realize is perfectly suited for the way this game works.

I can't praise Dead Rising enough for actually having a story. Most games these days just drop you in and pretty much say 'Ok, go! Kill anything that moves, that's all you need to know.'

The game becomes much deeper the longer you play. And I love a lot of the nice touches... when you change clothes those changes stick with you even during the cut scenes (nice job!). The openness of being able to play the game though the story, or simply perform side missions, or avoiding both of those and simply killing zombies is pretty cool. Another nice touch is the hidden items or unlockables. Anyone who has achieved the real mega man gun, will know the game changes to a whole other level.

And that's my favorite thing about Dead Rising. I've probably played this game over and over more than anything else. Part of that is because of perhaps the best achievement system I've ever encountered in a 360 game.

Viva Pinata is an odd game, in that it appears targeted towards younger childen, and is extremely cutesy and underwhelming to initially play, but if you allow youself to play for a while and dig into some of the deeper elements, it becomes somewhat addicting. It's basically about gardening, animal gathering, and breeding. Even those don't really sound that appealing, but it actually works.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2007 1:43PM loonyboi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
For the thousandth time, Firaxis/2K can't do a sequel to Alpha Centauri because we don't have the rights. :(

If you want a sequel, talk to EA.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2007 7:52PM JRock3x8 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
wow, I loved every single 360 game on your disappointing list - i think you have strange expectations for your video games.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2007 2:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
YOU F*CKING TARDS!!! IT IS AN OPINION!!! IF YOU DON"T LIKE IT, GOOD FOR MOTHERF*CKING YOU!!! HE WON'T CHANGE HIS OPINION, BECAUSE IT IS AN OPINION!!!

And for every commentator who didn't bitch and/or moan (there must be atleast one) Happy New Year.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2007 4:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Whoa. Are you okay?

Blogging is all about opinion. If you don't want an opinion, then why offer the ability to comment at all? It's not about attempting to changing someone's opinion, but rather offer your perspective on the topic at hand.

If you don't agree with someone's opinion, no need to call them "F*CKING TARDS." Naming calling never drives a point home anyway. It just makes people unlikely to take you seriously.

And that's my opinion.

Happy New Year.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2007 5:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
a2, though chances say you will probably never read this, I would like to say: Thank you. I am not talking to you. I have been left jaded by forums like this, and I have been a tad bit, well, foul, today, to say the least. You are right. Allow me to put in a calmer manner what I wanted to say. The commentators are obviously entitled to their opinions, yet, they cannot say them calmly. I know I did no better, and for that I'm sorry. Thank you very much.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2007 8:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
After having played WoW for almost a year, the concept of an MMORPG without people in it is incredably inviting.
Reply

Posted: Jan 1st 2007 9:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Damn. EA has the rights to Alpha Centauri? That's not good.

Well, maybe in Civ V, you can do the "sweep of time" thing you guys were suggesting and have the game continue once you land on Alpha Centauri...

You guys make that, and I'll even buy Simgolf 2.
Reply

Posted: Jan 14th 2007 2:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
civ4 is good but games are long even if you start on mideval times with fast mode on

online games are a pain to start up and get people in

but all in all its a good game

i personally like team games online in civ4 like 2v2 or 3v3 or 2v2v2
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

WRUP: All the Reckoning

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 11:45PM

Xbox Live Indie Gems: Nyan Cat Adventure

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 10:15PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW