Satoru Iwata: biggest Japanese industry cheese of '06?

It's nice that Iwata won, but any credibility the poll had is destroyed by the fact Kutaragi came second.

Ken Kutaragi should have won! He had the biggest effects on the industry last year with all his crazy ass talk that made everyone think twise about buying the Piece of Shit 3.

Well this makes sense considering Nintendo changed they way be play console games. After playing Wii Sports, I wondered how I ever liked Tekken Bowling (it was in Tekken Tag Tournament), also I wondered how I even liked Mario Tennis with a conventional controller, and not to mention other golf games.

Just votes and no explination?

2. Ken Kutaragi

- "For bringing the world 'The Forth Dimension'"

that's a nice black wii! Can we get some Iwata?!

You can still be big if you screw up big.

Nice to see my two favorite video games people made the list - at 4 and 5. If they had not ben born - no stealth genre, no Zelda or mario.

the ps3 is a a good bargin you get a computer and gaming system your too poor to buy 1 is all david 004!! get a real job and quit Mcdonalds then you can afford a true gaming machine! until then keep your garage sale toy 360 and wii.

Who the heck is Hironobu Sakaguchi?

@7

Head of Mistwalker, the Final Fantasy Father

"7. Who the heck is Hironobu Sakaguchi?"

Some n00b.

the ps3 is selling quite well in Japan. remember, there's no 360 to compete with.

Just because we don't like Kutaragi doesn't mean we need to question his placement on the list.

He's still influential, crazy or not, and the guy basically changed the course of gaming for the last 11 years.

Nobody remembers Nintendo charging us 70$ a cart for a game back in '95? Anyone? Bueller? Of course not. We're too busy being Wii fan boys to appreciate what each company brings to the table through competition.

wrong thread v1cious.

And by "quite well" you mean 4th overall behind both nintendo consoles.

But it is spanking the 360 there.

no i'm in the right thread. my point is i can see why they would stick up for Ken Katuragi. whether you like him or not, he made Sony a lot of money, especially on the ps2. also Nintendo's hardware is last gen, so despite sales, most Japanese developers will look to Sony for their next-gen projects. even it they're not exclusive, the japanese will only buy the Sony version, simply because they despise the 360. xenophobia ftw

Not to mention that Ken Kutaragi brought us what remains the top-selling home console in the world (the PS2), and three of the current top five positions on the Japanese hardware chart (where this list is from, after all).

I'd say that's some pretty good success. How many consoles have *you* managed to sell 100 million of? How many has Iwata? I'll tell you how many: none. Iwata wasn't head honcho early enough to claim the GBA, and the DS Lite's not yet hit 25 million worldwide. The Wii is just getting started. So the jury's still out, despite his early success (and seriously, congrats to him on that, and he deserves the #1 spot this year for it). Kutaragi, though, has directly overseen the production of two consoles that have both sold 100 million units. His 10 year lifespan prediction for the PS2 doesn't seem so crazy right now, does it?

Dislike Ken Kutaragi all you want. Make fun of his height. Make fun of the PS3. The fact is he's sold more than 200 million game consoles in his tenure, and his company is still at or near the top of every home console sales chart worldwide.

GO WII60!!! We got 2 guys from nintendo up there, now just for some microsoft guys... ken has no idea what he's doing and is responsible for the worst system of all time... worse than the 3DO... Sony probably won't last another 5 years before they'll have to be bought out by Microsoft just to stay afloat

Hironobu Sakaguchi (Mistwalker) -- 126 votes

Thats a vote for Microsoft. He's done more to sell Xbox360s in Japan than anyone else.

But has kuturagi done a whole lot other than spout bs in the last year? This isn't about what they;ve done in the last 10 years, it's about 2006. Ken hasn't done jack shit execpt for what all the other sony execs have done, hurt thair brand name and lie through their teeth.

@Jeff: Though I agree that Kutaragi is certainly among the most important and successful gaming figures, and certainly deserved the top spot on that list many many times, I really don't think it was a good year for him.

I am certainly not one of the people who foretell Sony's certain doom, but we can all agree that the Playstation 3 went from the certain winner of the console wars by about 80 million consoles, to the likely loser in 2006.

Chances are, 10 years from now, this will be in a list of the Top 25 mistakes in gaming.

So, unless they judge by both good and bad influence, I don't think Kutaragi should be that close to Iwata. To exaggerate it just slightly, one saved his company from certain doom, the other one have doomed his.

Earlier success doesn't help against mistakes, as Gunpei Yokoi (the father of the Gameboy and the Virtual Boy) would know.

I only wish FFXII would come to 360, then I wouldn't need to buy a ps3.

"Just because we don't like Kutaragi doesn't mean we need to question his placement on the list.

He's still influential, crazy or not, and the guy basically changed the course of gaming for the last 11 years.

Nobody remembers Nintendo charging us 70$ a cart for a game back in '95? Anyone? Bueller? Of course not. We're too busy being Wii fan boys to appreciate what each company brings to the table through competition."

--------------------

I'll question his placement on the list. Sony is losing TONS on PS3. It's selling well but Sony has yet to make back what they've lost in developing it. The reputation of PS3 being a 'trojan horse' for Sony's proprietary formats.

Actually, I probably shouldn't question him, because I'm not supposed to question an architect about a defect that was intentionally made that way.

I should praise him on an innovation that he didn't copy from another competitor, who his co-executives call gimmicky. *shrugs*

Remember kids, the Playstation 3 is not a games system. It's like he thinks a large association with games will make his 'masterpiece' kiddy or gimmicky, when gamers are the majority of his buyers.

Nintendo charged $70 for cartridges because there's more hardware to them than CDs or DVDs, you can save games, some cartridges could be made to increase the system's processing power, that kind of stuff. Since then though Nintendo games have stayed $50 or below on a $250 system vs. $60 PS3 games for a $600 system. Nintendo's past vs. Sony's NOW. Which one should the customers be more worried about?

I don't know if people were expected to buy a 3DO to not be considered fanboys but it shouldn't be any different with PS3, except for the established brandname.

I still hold Gunpei Yokoi to a higher standard than Kutaragi. The man made Metroid and Kid Icarus (read: ACTUALLY MADE GAMES) instead of talking to us vaguely about "the 4th dimension".

-----------------------

"Dislike Ken Kutaragi all you want. Make fun of his height."

But where's the fun in that?
-----------------------

"Make fun of the PS3. The fact is he's sold more than 200 million game consoles in his tenure, and his company is still at or near the top of every home console sales chart worldwide."

I'm laughing at the above that somehow Kuturagi rested on those facts and decided there was justification for making a $600 console. That such prices would lead two of the industry leaders (Sony and MS) to make "lesser bundles for gamers". They're PC-izing the gaming market, that's what they're doing.

And observing that it's only "fanboys" that are wrong for making fun of such a folly.

Though I have nothing but admiration for MS now. They're pretty much spot-on now, with a well-rounded service AND console, PLENTY of support from THEMSELVES and 3rd-Parties, all they have to do is make things more affordable and win over Japan. Even the Wii I admit is not a well-rounded console (in choosing gameplay and interface as priority over graphics and power), but Nintendo had a reason for doing it and EXPLAINED IT CLEARLY over the last couple TGSes and E3s and conventions in between.

I still say that MS be honest and axe the Core Bundle.

The thing with Ken is that he's an ENGINEER (afaik, anyways) and it seems NO ONE was there to tell him that NO you can't expect to make a 600$ console and sell it as something else. I mean, seriously, it looks as if sony just let him loose and told him "do your shit".
He has been a good asset to SCE previously, but on the PS3, engineering dreams (POWER!!!) were given too much priority.

That's for Ken's defence.
Apart from that, I'm not geek enough to know all the names on that list, so I won't comment on who deserved what.