| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (22)

Posted: Jan 15th 2007 12:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Jack's just trying implement random ideas like FDR did with his New Deal 1. Unfortunately for Jack, no one wants to back him haha.
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2007 12:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Its actually a pretty sensical plan

But it'll never work... ($)
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2007 12:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How is it "sensical"? Did you read the article or just the blurb? What gives you the idea that even if he had the power to stop games legislation a pathological loon like Thompson would stick to it? He regularly attacks his own partners, what would make you think he wouldn't turn around and bite the industry at his earliest opportunity? Better to keep Jack as loony gadfly then legitimate opponent.
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2007 12:47PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thompson aside, the idea sounds pretty neat, save for the money the publishers would lose out on the sales. And where would games like GTA be today, be it not for the cool kids (emphasion on kids) playing the game?

*Flameshield: check. *
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2007 1:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why waste your effort rebutting anything coming from JT? He has no common sense and is obviously the pawn of some other organization's agenda (My money is on the marketing department for Take Two given Bully's sales figures).

All that needs to be said about his latest insane proposal is that it is textbook extortion.
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2007 7:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This isn't very practical and would be the equivalent of film studios not letting certain theaters get reels of their film if they sold tickets to minor. All it does is pass the buck even further back which is exactly the opposite of what's needed. What next, developers being forced to avoid certain publishers that deliver to said retailers?

Not to mention that the feasibility of relying on publishers to regulate this would be a nightmare when taking into account financial predictions/forecasts, shipment allocations and budgets, etc.

The responsibility needs to be passed to the parents, not further down the chain. Just my 2 cents.
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2007 2:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
the idea is great, and the fact that it comes from good ol jack is no deterrant. the implementation is where it would fail. youd need a new branch of government to enforce this. Alochol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Video Game division?
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2007 1:51PM WedgeTalon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Screw all the points that have been mentioned about the JACK system so far, what about ME?

Under the system, if, say, EBGames, had titles pulled, then I'm no longer able to buy my Grand Theft Auto 128 from them just because a handful of kids SOMEhow are able to go to the store and buy an M rated game with Mom and Dad's money, without them knowing. That's a number likely so small that it would typically be called a statistical error.

Think for a moment, M is supposed to be inappropriate for those *under* 17. Kids can drive a car by themselves at 16. That gives them one year where they're able to drive to the store (or a job, for that matter) without permission from parents. So can someone please tell me how all of these 10-year-olds are getting to the store without parental supervision? Biking? Maybe a very, Very small minority. Walking? I doubt it. Mom & Dad driving them and then not caring what the f* they do at the store? Yes.

[/rant]
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2007 2:06PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
DOWN WITH JACK THOMPSON ARTICLES! Please do not feed the trolls!
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2007 2:28PM teejaykay said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Though impractical, this is the best idea Thompson's ever had. But then again, that's not saying much, is it?
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2007 3:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The big problem I see with this plan is that any system of measuring success is completely arbitrary. What sort of success rate is considered exceptable? Is he honestly saying that if one single game is sold to a minor the whole store be cut off? or is it the whole chain of stores? If a walmart in florida screws up should washington stores suffer? This seems like a situation where if they tried to impliment a remotely reasonable version of this Jack would say "noooo, 99% isn't good enough, because that means 1% of our children are raging psychotic killers!" and then continue to be as loud and belligerent as usual.
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2007 5:13PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I like kicking a man when he's down, too.

This just looks like another "bandaid" approach to the problems in today's culture. You're not going to effect change by just going after games.

Let's say, as an IT Professional, I devise a "quick fix" solution to a symptom a computer is having. A week later, I have to reimplement this "quick fix". Is this impractical or what?
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2007 5:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is just another case of Thompson flexing his imaginary muscle. He has the power to make the legislation go away? Please. Only an egomaniac like him would think he has that much stroke. Besides, we all know he's a pathological liar and would go back on his word whenever it suits him. Everything this man does is motivated by his ego and desire for attention, one way or another.
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2007 5:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Or stroking his imaginary ego. He's eventually going to post on this one. The article is all about him and he posts to all of those.

- Warren Lewis
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2007 5:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is just another example of Jack being Jack, knowing JACK, and talking out of his [Jack]a**. The real sad thing is how the media jumped on it and referred to it as an Olive Branch. I'd expect nothing more from Jackie-boy, but I really wish the media would actually, I dunno, research their stories a bit more. Oh well.
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2007 5:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I forgot to add.

Thompson makes it seem like that if everyone does what he says HE WILL make all the legislation go away.

For starters he acts like he has all that power. The only thing I can see thet will keep them from trying ro pass legislation is fail trying to pass it and have their state cough up the dough to cover the industries legal fees. Then after that will they realise it's pointless and expensive and stop. Other than that Thompson can't do anything but run his mouth and make promises he cannot keep.

- Warren Lewis
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2007 7:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
At the above who think this idea has merit of any kind. Since you didn't read the whole article I'll remind you.

IT IS NOT THE STUDIO'S JOB TO MONITOR THE POINT OF SALE.

By Jack's (lack of) logic Ford is accountable for all auto accidents involving their cars. So Ford should pull all their cars from the market. Wild Turkey should pull their liquor from any store that an alcoholic has purchased their product from.

If you don't get it by now you never will.
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2007 11:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is just Jack laying the groundwork to bash the industry again. Of course they're not going to take him up on it, for a wide variety of reasons. But once they don't, he'll be able to convince suckers HE'S the reasonable one.
Reply

Posted: Jan 15th 2007 11:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Though I have little respect for Mr. McCauley or his various analyses, he's correct here. Cross-company regulation makes no sense, especially when the best form of censorship (self-censorship/self-protection) is already gladly carried out in the United States.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2007 5:01AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@GhaleonQ

Hmmm... which of my various analyses do you take issue with?

Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2007 12:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The one point that Dennis left out is that internal audit records can be requested by an attorney in the case of a civil suit. Implementing Jack's plan would be like handing him a blank check, and could be used as proof of fault during a trial. It's a Trojan horse plan by Jack, so that he wins no matter what. If the industry refuses, he can continue to paint them as a bad guy who only care about their own interest. If they comply, he can use their own records against them in his next exploitation case for his own personal profits.
Reply

Posted: Jan 16th 2007 5:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It would ba a win-win situation for Jack

- Warren Lewis
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW