| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (12)

Posted: Jan 30th 2007 2:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's a damn shame that SiN didn't do well enough to justify a sequel. I think I got a lot of game out of my $20.

I loved being able to shoot those jet pack enemies on the roof and send them spiraling out of control.

Plus, Bianca Beauchamp. Rawr.

Posted: Jan 30th 2007 2:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's a shame, I enjoyed SIN: episode 1. (Well when they patched it... pre-patch it was harder than a T-rex's shit... Okay I stole that from someone).

Posted: Jan 30th 2007 2:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm glad I didn't support this $20 demo/vaporware.

I hope this is a message to every company that does episodic games. I knew this would fail since day 1. And some digital Scarlett Johansson wannabe is not going to sell me on a game.

Posted: Jan 30th 2007 3:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, sucks the main character wasn't master chief, eh HaloBreaker?

$20 for a good solid game is a deal to me... I got it for less cuz I downloaded it off steam.

Alot better than $50 for Halo 2. A subpar FPS.

Posted: Jan 30th 2007 3:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't like Halo at all. I've had this handle since Rocket Arena 1. Nice try at a burn though, I loved the original SiN and bought it over Half life.

Posted: Jan 30th 2007 4:35PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Halo 2 was awesome, I don't know what you're talking about. Now, getting back to the topic: although I have never played SIN, I plan on buying it. Also, unlike HaloBreaker, I'm not too "loyal" (see foolish) to bitch about something I've never played. Oh, and by the way, HaloBreaker, great job as a Microsoft fanboy, because SIN is for the PC. Dumbass. YOU FAIL.

Posted: Jan 30th 2007 4:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Episode content is a joke. I'll never buy 1/2 a game in hopes they will release the next 1/2 "soon".

It just gives devs more of a reason to put out a half done game and get some fast cash.

Posted: Jan 30th 2007 4:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh shi-
...I'm the dumbass now, aren't I?

My apologies, HaloBreaker, I did not read the second post of yours before I confirmed.

Posted: Jan 30th 2007 4:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sorry, that's me above, Defenestrator2.0, the stupid password system is crap. That's a handle I used once, over a year ago, making fun of someone else's name.

Posted: Jan 30th 2007 5:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Doesnt the picture look like Scarlet Johanssen?

Posted: Jan 30th 2007 6:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well at least the store version had the original sin in it so it was worth the 20 bucks to those who had never played the game.

Posted: Jan 31st 2007 9:25AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
sin ep1 made a profit, evn though it went overbudget. However it dodn't make enough money to totally fund Ep2. (however EP2 would have been much cheaper to produce as the assets were now mostly made).

IMHO returning to Sin "at a later date" is a dumb idea. By then the engine and assets will be outdated and it will take another huge investment to get going again. Its basicaly NOW OR NEVER for Sin Ep2.

(still, everyone at ritual seems a lot happier now they can get bck to making fun, innovative games instead of grinding out mass-produced FPS after FPS)

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW