| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (23)

Posted: Feb 15th 2007 10:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah, it is a game... it's the players that determine if the game's a sandbox-style or a side-scroller with a clear mission and very little variety.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2007 7:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
picture... turns me on?
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2007 7:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I always let girls win at sex. It's like playing checkers against a kid. It just makes them so happy.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2007 7:21PM Gombard said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow, me thinks poster # 3 needs to have a romance dance, any ladies care to help him out?
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2007 7:23PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
i gotta give a shout out to Dr. Eric Berne for his work "The Games That People Play". yo yo yo (shakes clenched fist in a round like from the Arsenio shows).
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2007 7:59PM MisterSmith said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh please, only nerds play video games, and nerds don't get laid.

Totally the wrong venue for this bit. ;) :p
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2007 8:02PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
We going to link where that picture came from?

I'm pretty sure it's in good form to do that.

If not, here ya go.

www.vgcats.com
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2007 8:02PM Mr Khan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
best...pic...ever
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2007 8:04PM MisterSmith said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
BTW, Stone Temple Pilot, if you do the registering thing directly above the text input box, your post will come up automatically after you enter it. No 3(+/-) hours for me (seconds would be more appropriate)
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2007 8:15PM AoE said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report

Interesting I guess? I like that joystiq is tackling more than just "new content on xbox live" and "insert negative sony news here." This is an interesting editorial in concept... but far too short to dig enough into the material to make it truly interesting. If you're going to attempt articles like this in the future (and please do!) don't hesitate to get wordy in the interest of imbuing the article with some depth... this reads like the teaser for a good article, where's the rest?

Also, granted my dictionary may be a bit outdated, but I suspect you meant line, not lign. ;)
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2007 8:54PM tucker973 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
AoE: If you're going to ride around on your high horse over there, maybe you should stop being such a [ed-let's be nice]. Bonnie has been writing this column for a LONG ass time. Idiot.

http://joystiq.com/tag/playingdirty
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2007 9:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Tucker: Get off your profanity pony (hehe! sorry, I couldn't resist) and realize that not everyone has time to read every article. He/She was just trying to give constructive criticism. And I agree. While I understand that a particularly long article is likely to simply be overlooked by many Joystiq readers, these really do need more length to adequately express some of the ideas brought up in Joystiq's editorials (not just Playing Dirty).
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2007 10:01PM AoE said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Tucker, thanks for the kind words buddy! What high-horse am I on exactly though? Too many big words? Let me see if I can boil my comments down to penny-words for you: I liked the idea of the article, but it was too short to really get into the subject matter. Go Joystiq for posting it, I'd like to see more articles like this, but with greater depth/length next time.

So, please explain the high-horse bit, and please also explain how the length of time Bonnie's been writing the column speaks to anything I said. Seriously, if you're going to call me names the editors feel the need to censor, you can take the time to explain yourself.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2007 10:09PM tucker973 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Actually, I was being derogatory because AoE clearly decided to jump on the 'random hating on joystiq' bandwagon. Sorry about the [insert random negative comment here], but if you're going to take the time to criticize someone's editorial content, then they should damn well make sure they know what they're talking about. Make the post longer? People will bitch that it's too long. Negative comment about the 360? OH NOES! JOYSTIQ IS ON SONY'S PAYROLL!!! Post about PS3s not selling? U R ALL XBOTS!!

Frankly, it's ridiculous. And when I see someone behaving like an idiot, I'm going to call them on it. "If you're going to attempt articles like this in the future..." Give me a damn break, have you ever even been to the site before, or do you have some kind of magical filter that blinds you to posts until you want to criticize them?
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2007 10:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
too bad most gamers only ever get to try singleplayer.
Reply

Posted: Feb 15th 2007 10:35PM AoE said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Tucker, calm down buddy, you'll give yourself a heart attack. This much rage over comments that aren't negative? I'm sorry for you man.

I didn't realize that my comments implied that Joystiq had never, in their history, had an editorial before. I was trying to say that they're just not at all common on the site. Do you disagree? When was the last time they posted an editorial that meditated on gaming like this? I'll bet it's been more than a week, and for the volume of articles posted, that's few and far between, wouldn't you say?

And where's the hate? Joystiq is one of my favorite sites. Should I start prefacing things with [humor] or [sarcasm] for your benefit?

You can be pissy all you want, at the end of the day though, I wasn't talking crap about the article or the site. Is your life so humorless that when I wrap words of encouragement and constructive criticism in a bit of sarcasm it goes sailing that far over your head? Really?!
Reply

Posted: Feb 16th 2007 1:10AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report

Sex* is a slow paced (at first) rythm game with way more moves than just 4 arrows and without such obvious prompts either.

There also isn't just one set of instruction but you have to figure out what the next bes move is using the available visual, auditory and force feedback clues.

That's why it would make a great rythm game/edutainment tool on the wii: move your body position with the analog stick, move your hands with the wiimote/nunchuck and select the way your fingers are (flat palm, claw, back of hand,...) and your hand moves (straight line, dotted line,...) with the buttons.

*and that definitely include foreplay.
Reply

Posted: Feb 16th 2007 1:49AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well if sex is a game then I'm LEEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOOYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY JJJJJJJJJJJJJEEEEEEEEEEEENKKKKKKKKKKKKINNNNNNNNNNNSSSSSSSSSSSSS

...

Oh, er, sorry, let me get you a towel.

...

What do you mean is that it? Wasn't that enough for you?

...

"Too fast"? "TOO FAST"?!

...

*sound of slam door slamming*

...

Hey, wait! GET BACK HERE! DO YOU KNOW HOW MUCH DKP THIS COST ME?!?! I STILL GOT 28 MINUTES ON THE METER!

(annnnnnnnnnnnnnd scene.)

[mmorgy.com: because we're this funny all the god damn time]
Reply

Posted: Feb 16th 2007 5:06AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Guys, gals and gamers out there...

Just remember that when your playing the sex game, your also playing with people's lives and emotions.

And getting a Sexually Transmitted Disease/Infection is a big ass "Game Over!" with no continues.
Reply

Posted: Feb 16th 2007 7:45AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
well that sure flew over my head D:
Reply

Posted: Feb 16th 2007 8:08AM MartyCota said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sexual intercourse is a gimmick and is niche. The majority of the animal kingdom does not participate in it to reproduce and it is mostly just short minigames (microgames for some people) It also attracts a wide audience and both girls and boys.

Probably why none of the Sony or M$ Fanboys are getting it!
Reply

Posted: Feb 16th 2007 12:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The original Super Mario Bros is one of my favorite games, not just because of the memories from playing it as a kid but more recently because of my wife performing a certain oral act while humming the theme song as I played it.

Sorry fellas, she's taken.
Reply

Posted: Feb 16th 2007 2:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@22 and i thought smoking a nice blunt while getting brain was pimp, getting it while playing mario and getting the theme song hummed, you sir put me to shame
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Portabliss: Time Ducks (iOS)

Posted on Feb 7th 2012 9:00PM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW