Playing Dirty: Getting your game on while you get it on
Valentine's Day is, if nothing else, sexy. Call it about love, call it about chocolate, call it about little pink cards you hand out to your friends. It's really about sex. S-E-X. So there's no better time than the quiet, post-coital lull that settles in after Valentine's Day to take a step back from our passions and reflect: Is sex a game?
The question may seem like a strange one at first. Our culture trains us to think of sex as something romantic and meaningful, as "making love." But that doesn't mean it can't be like a game and still retain its sappy dignity. Johan Huizinga, author of Homo Ludens and the granddaddy of all "That is so a game!" theory, slapped the same label on lots of "respectable" human activities, like poetry, philosophy, even war. In fact, he said pretty much anything could be considered a game, or at least play, as long as it complied to a few basic guidelines.
First, it has to be voluntary. Second, it should exist outside the ordinary, in its own separate space, and have a clear beginning and end. It should also have rules, order, and involve repetition. True, Huizinga himself said that, "if we stick to the formal and functional characteristics of play... it is evident that few of them are really illustrative of the sexual act." But if we take a second look at sex using Huizinga's guidelines, we might be surprised to see how well things match up.
Sex definitely exists outside the flow of ordinary life. Even if it's an everyday thing for you, it has its own separate space, both literally (the home, the bedroom, the bed itself) and in terms of frame of mind. It also has a clear beginning and an end; most of us don't "sort of have sex," and we certainly don't have to wonder, as we sip our morning coffee, "Is sex over?" As for repetition, it exists in sex on all scales, from something as minute as pelvic thrusting to something as big as sex on the whole, which we take part in again and again.
Of course, the "voluntary" clause rules out all non-consensual sex. The really tricky guideline though is the one about rules and order. Our rules for sex are cultural. Like where, if I may be so blunt, is it okay to stick it? What body parts should I touch? It's all about who does what to whom in what way and when. But, come on, does sex really create order? That's where taboos come in, rules about what's forbidden. They keep people in lign with society's standards. Every time we participate in "normal sex," we're doing our little part too.
And so, as the day of hearts and candy and getting it on draws to a definitive close, the only question that remains is: Didn't any luck gamer with a culinary sweetie get baked a Valentine's Day game cake? Maybe Peach in the throes of lust, or Cloud in his birthday suit? Don't be shy; you can tell. After all, love may come and go, but a game cake is forever.
Bonnie Ruberg is a writer, researcher, and all around fangirl with a big crush on games. Find more of her work at Gamasutra, The Onion A. V. Club, or her blog, Heroine Sheik. She can be reached at
.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Patrick @ Feb 15th 2007 7:10PM
picture... turns me on?
Rubang B @ Feb 15th 2007 7:14PM
I always let girls win at sex. It's like playing checkers against a kid. It just makes them so happy.
Gombard @ Feb 15th 2007 7:21PM
Wow, me thinks poster # 3 needs to have a romance dance, any ladies care to help him out?
bubbacrosbysucks @ Feb 15th 2007 7:23PM
i gotta give a shout out to Dr. Eric Berne for his work "The Games That People Play". yo yo yo (shakes clenched fist in a round like from the Arsenio shows).
Blue_Falcon @ Feb 15th 2007 7:59PM
Oh please, only nerds play video games, and nerds don't get laid.
Totally the wrong venue for this bit. ;) :p
Mr Khan @ Feb 15th 2007 8:02PM
best...pic...ever
Loque @ Feb 15th 2007 8:02PM
We going to link where that picture came from?
I'm pretty sure it's in good form to do that.
If not, here ya go.
www.vgcats.com
Blue_Falcon @ Feb 15th 2007 8:04PM
BTW, Stone Temple Pilot, if you do the registering thing directly above the text input box, your post will come up automatically after you enter it. No 3(+/-) hours for me (seconds would be more appropriate)
AoE @ Feb 15th 2007 8:15PM
Interesting I guess? I like that joystiq is tackling more than just "new content on xbox live" and "insert negative sony news here." This is an interesting editorial in concept... but far too short to dig enough into the material to make it truly interesting. If you're going to attempt articles like this in the future (and please do!) don't hesitate to get wordy in the interest of imbuing the article with some depth... this reads like the teaser for a good article, where's the rest?
Also, granted my dictionary may be a bit outdated, but I suspect you meant line, not lign. ;)
Tucker @ Feb 15th 2007 8:54PM
AoE: If you're going to ride around on your high horse over there, maybe you should stop being such a [ed-let's be nice]. Bonnie has been writing this column for a LONG ass time. Idiot.
http://joystiq.com/tag/playingdirty
AssemblyLineHuman @ Feb 15th 2007 9:38PM
Tucker: Get off your profanity pony (hehe! sorry, I couldn't resist) and realize that not everyone has time to read every article. He/She was just trying to give constructive criticism. And I agree. While I understand that a particularly long article is likely to simply be overlooked by many Joystiq readers, these really do need more length to adequately express some of the ideas brought up in Joystiq's editorials (not just Playing Dirty).
AoE @ Feb 15th 2007 10:01PM
@Tucker, thanks for the kind words buddy! What high-horse am I on exactly though? Too many big words? Let me see if I can boil my comments down to penny-words for you: I liked the idea of the article, but it was too short to really get into the subject matter. Go Joystiq for posting it, I'd like to see more articles like this, but with greater depth/length next time.
So, please explain the high-horse bit, and please also explain how the length of time Bonnie's been writing the column speaks to anything I said. Seriously, if you're going to call me names the editors feel the need to censor, you can take the time to explain yourself.
Tucker @ Feb 15th 2007 10:09PM
Actually, I was being derogatory because AoE clearly decided to jump on the 'random hating on joystiq' bandwagon. Sorry about the [insert random negative comment here], but if you're going to take the time to criticize someone's editorial content, then they should damn well make sure they know what they're talking about. Make the post longer? People will bitch that it's too long. Negative comment about the 360? OH NOES! JOYSTIQ IS ON SONY'S PAYROLL!!! Post about PS3s not selling? U R ALL XBOTS!!
Frankly, it's ridiculous. And when I see someone behaving like an idiot, I'm going to call them on it. "If you're going to attempt articles like this in the future..." Give me a damn break, have you ever even been to the site before, or do you have some kind of magical filter that blinds you to posts until you want to criticize them?
kyle @ Feb 15th 2007 10:21PM
too bad most gamers only ever get to try singleplayer.
AoE @ Feb 15th 2007 10:35PM
@Tucker, calm down buddy, you'll give yourself a heart attack. This much rage over comments that aren't negative? I'm sorry for you man.
I didn't realize that my comments implied that Joystiq had never, in their history, had an editorial before. I was trying to say that they're just not at all common on the site. Do you disagree? When was the last time they posted an editorial that meditated on gaming like this? I'll bet it's been more than a week, and for the volume of articles posted, that's few and far between, wouldn't you say?
And where's the hate? Joystiq is one of my favorite sites. Should I start prefacing things with [humor] or [sarcasm] for your benefit?
You can be pissy all you want, at the end of the day though, I wasn't talking crap about the article or the site. Is your life so humorless that when I wrap words of encouragement and constructive criticism in a bit of sarcasm it goes sailing that far over your head? Really?!
BigDrahma @ Feb 15th 2007 10:39PM
Yeah, it is a game... it's the players that determine if the game's a sandbox-style or a side-scroller with a clear mission and very little variety.
Sri Lumpa @ Feb 16th 2007 1:10AM
Sex* is a slow paced (at first) rythm game with way more moves than just 4 arrows and without such obvious prompts either.
There also isn't just one set of instruction but you have to figure out what the next bes move is using the available visual, auditory and force feedback clues.
That's why it would make a great rythm game/edutainment tool on the wii: move your body position with the analog stick, move your hands with the wiimote/nunchuck and select the way your fingers are (flat palm, claw, back of hand,...) and your hand moves (straight line, dotted line,...) with the buttons.
*and that definitely include foreplay.
qDot @ Feb 16th 2007 1:49AM
Well if sex is a game then I'm LEEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOOYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY JJJJJJJJJJJJJEEEEEEEEEEEENKKKKKKKKKKKKINNNNNNNNNNNSSSSSSSSSSSSS
...
Oh, er, sorry, let me get you a towel.
...
What do you mean is that it? Wasn't that enough for you?
...
"Too fast"? "TOO FAST"?!
...
*sound of slam door slamming*
...
Hey, wait! GET BACK HERE! DO YOU KNOW HOW MUCH DKP THIS COST ME?!?! I STILL GOT 28 MINUTES ON THE METER!
(annnnnnnnnnnnnnd scene.)
[mmorgy.com: because we're this funny all the god damn time]
Kye @ Feb 16th 2007 5:06AM
Guys, gals and gamers out there...
Just remember that when your playing the sex game, your also playing with people's lives and emotions.
And getting a Sexually Transmitted Disease/Infection is a big ass "Game Over!" with no continues.
ALH @ Feb 16th 2007 7:45AM
well that sure flew over my head D:
Martin @ Feb 16th 2007 8:08AM
Sexual intercourse is a gimmick and is niche. The majority of the animal kingdom does not participate in it to reproduce and it is mostly just short minigames (microgames for some people) It also attracts a wide audience and both girls and boys.
Probably why none of the Sony or M$ Fanboys are getting it!
Hale Seighton @ Feb 16th 2007 12:31PM
The original Super Mario Bros is one of my favorite games, not just because of the memories from playing it as a kid but more recently because of my wife performing a certain oral act while humming the theme song as I played it.
Sorry fellas, she's taken.
pete @ Feb 16th 2007 2:32PM
@22 and i thought smoking a nice blunt while getting brain was pimp, getting it while playing mario and getting the theme song hummed, you sir put me to shame