Activision today announced it has licensed Epic's Unreal Engine 3 for an upcoming "action" title. The deal would seem to end -- or at least put on hold -- Activision's frequent use of id Software's game engines; though a partnership will continue to exist, as Activision remains the publisher of Quake Wars. No further details were disclosed, but the possibilities have our spider-sense tingling...
Activision licenses Unreal Engine 3
14
Activision today announced it has licensed Epic's Unreal Engine 3 for an upcoming "action" title. The deal would seem to end -- or at least put on hold -- Activision's frequent use of id Software's game engines; though a partnership will continue to exist, as Activision remains the publisher of Quake Wars. No further details were disclosed, but the possibilities have our spider-sense tingling...
Reader Comments (14)
Posted: Feb 23rd 2007 3:05PM (Unverified) said
"No further details were disclosed, but the possibilities have our spider-sense tingling..."
So why would you anticipate a bad thing?
So why would you anticipate a bad thing?
Posted: Feb 23rd 2007 3:06PM (Unverified) said
!Yeah baby Gears of Duty 4...
Posted: Feb 23rd 2007 3:28PM (Unverified) said
@2
ROFLMAO
ROFLMAO
Posted: Feb 23rd 2007 3:54PM VampireHunterZ said
Is anyone keeping count of how many licensees Epic have?
Posted: Feb 23rd 2007 4:10PM (Unverified) said
I love the Unreal3 engine and all, but anyone worried that it could make every game end up looking 80% alike?
We need engine diversity. Serious, ID, Renderware, Crysis, Source... who else? Catch up with these guys and start licensing your engine! Just compete on price and features - not so difficult...
We need engine diversity. Serious, ID, Renderware, Crysis, Source... who else? Catch up with these guys and start licensing your engine! Just compete on price and features - not so difficult...
Posted: Feb 23rd 2007 4:18PM (Unverified) said
Hmmm let see:
1-Activision (..?)
2-Ubisoft (Fuel of War)
3-EA...?
4-Gearbox (Brothers in Arm Hell Highway)
5-from the developer`s of Bioshock
6-from the developer`s of Mass Effect
7-from the developer`s of Too Human
8-from the developer`s of hell gate London
9-...?
1-Activision (..?)
2-Ubisoft (Fuel of War)
3-EA...?
4-Gearbox (Brothers in Arm Hell Highway)
5-from the developer`s of Bioshock
6-from the developer`s of Mass Effect
7-from the developer`s of Too Human
8-from the developer`s of hell gate London
9-...?
Posted: Feb 23rd 2007 4:20PM (Unverified) said
Epic must be laughing all the way to the bank.
Posted: Feb 23rd 2007 4:42PM (Unverified) said
It's never too early to start bidding on Unreal Engine 4!
Posted: Feb 23rd 2007 5:42PM (Unverified) said
@5
The unreal engine seems to be highly customizable though, as much as the developer wants to take it. The new mmorpg, Vanguard, is run on the unreal 2 engine..that looks nothing like ut2k4. Aside from that, the engine is amazing. It looks good and plays great, evne on an old crappy computer. But ofcourse is able to look even better on a high end system
The unreal engine seems to be highly customizable though, as much as the developer wants to take it. The new mmorpg, Vanguard, is run on the unreal 2 engine..that looks nothing like ut2k4. Aside from that, the engine is amazing. It looks good and plays great, evne on an old crappy computer. But ofcourse is able to look even better on a high end system
Posted: Feb 23rd 2007 4:57PM (Unverified) said
hhmmm. well here is a problem. alot of companies like epic liscense their engine to make money. while the devs that dont want to make their own engine take the easy way out by just buying someone elses engine. then other companies like to hold on to their engines cause they are highly customized and they want to protect their hard work. so idk. i would definitally like to see games running on some new engines.
u can totally creat a new game but using a familiar engine makes it feel a little, too familiar. thus destroying any potential for genuine originality.
u can totally creat a new game but using a familiar engine makes it feel a little, too familiar. thus destroying any potential for genuine originality.
Posted: Feb 23rd 2007 5:47PM sand0789 said
I don't know that using the Epic engine will make games look and play the same as one another. All released UE3 games that I know of are shooters. I don't see them being any more similar to one another than they are to typical non-UE3 shooters. Gears and R6V look quite a bit different. Vegas has some color and Gears is absolutely saturated with colors. They play very different as well, though they both use cover and some 3rd person, with Gears being all third person.
I actually really, really like what I've seen come out on UE3 so far, so it is difficult for me to say more of it is bad. that may change after the 20th UE3 game though.
I am curious to see if you can make a good racing, platform, or other type of game using UE3.
I actually really, really like what I've seen come out on UE3 so far, so it is difficult for me to say more of it is bad. that may change after the 20th UE3 game though.
I am curious to see if you can make a good racing, platform, or other type of game using UE3.
Posted: Feb 23rd 2007 6:06PM Duscrom said
Oh Jake, there is a 3rd Unreal 3 engine game out.. that looks completely different.. and plays completely different.
RObo-Blitz...
So you guys still worried?
RObo-Blitz...
So you guys still worried?
Posted: Feb 23rd 2007 6:44PM NavParker said
Badly lighted, dwippy stock photos!
Posted: Feb 23rd 2007 11:56PM (Unverified) said
rainbow six vegas uses it.
Featured Stories
The politics of making games: Disconnect between 38 Studios and Rhode Island in quotes
Posted on May 24th 2012 6:45PM


