| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (63)

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 12:12AM Daxter1985 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow that looks...Real
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 12:15AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Should I b fapping?:/
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 12:33AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Im wondering how that will look on Xbox 360.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 12:50AM moofree said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Very shiny. Looks promising.

After Metroid Prime and Bioshock, This is #3 on the games of 2007 I'm waiting for.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 1:03AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
is this a ps3/360 game? or is it a 360 exclusive?
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 1:38AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's PC only.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 1:12AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"It's PC only."
^I thought they announced it for the 360 not to long ago..(Or heard something of that sorts)
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 1:20AM jaysins said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Wow, that was very impressive. At low res it looks real. It'd be interesting to see how the high resolution counterpart looks in comparison. I can feel my FPS dropping to where the game looks more like a slide show.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 10:34PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
MUWHAHAHAHAHA! YES Console Kiddies. This is PC ONLY! You won't be seeing graphics like these on your XBOX 360 or PS3.. at all. =D
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 1:55AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
that really blows. PC gaming is overrated. i really wish it was coming to 360
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 2:06AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I do too, I cant afford an 8800.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 2:15AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I thought graphics didnt make the game???

Also,what does this "after the break" thing on joystiq mean? I read that all the time and I guess i'm just not getting it.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 2:25AM karmaghost said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
1.) Joystiq, with all the hype surrounding this game, the graphics hype was the one you've been unconvinced with as of yet? Everything I've seen so far about this game has had something to do with the graphics or physics, with gameplay being an afterthought. Were you being sarcastic?

2.) "After the break" means clicking on the link you clicked on to get to the posts and, therefore, the rest of the content.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 2:45AM woooooooot said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"that really blows. PC gaming is overrated."

My god. It is not.

However, i don't see why it wouldn't be ported to other consoles eventually. This is EA we are talking about.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 2:53AM Serious Kriss said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
1) This dates back to an event that took place on January 31st : http://easymax.net/imagina/monaco/IMAGTP-Event/imagtp_eventus.php

2) This isn't Crysis footage, it's simply an application of the CryEngine2 to an architecture project.

3) Anyone who thinks Crysis is just graphics should just inform themselves. Seriously.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 4:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"I thought graphics diddent make the game"
-giga two

They dont, the experance and innovation of crysis will make the game play.No xbox 360 though...But the guys over at crytec said that somebody with a graphics card a couple of years old will be able to play it, just not at full. you'll need a 8800gtx or higher dx10 card. >belch< !

holy crap its a pc-gamer!

my specs
asus an8-sli deluxe
amd athalonX2 64 4600+ dual core
evga nvidia 8800 gtx
2 gig dual channel kingston
1-maxtor 120gig
1-maxtor 300gig

10,000rpm raptors,1 more 8800gtx, and 2 more gig ram coming soon! SLi beeeach!
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 3:13AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"However, i don't see why it wouldn't be ported to other consoles eventually. This is EA we are talking about."

EA!!!!!! NNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!

there goes any hope of this game knocking it out of the park like they think it will. or could this actually be an ORIGINAL, WELL DONE game by EA?

the apocolypse is near!!!
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 4:21AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's phat!

Anyone that likes that will like...

www.TNAOBB.blogspot.com

Catch it!
Reply

Posted: Feb 25th 2007 4:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well I just spooged myself. That was amazing.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 4:08AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
... They really think anyone has a computer that can run that?

My Radeon 8500LE would not know how to start on that one.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 5:03AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
How much does a 8800gtx or higher cost?
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 5:14AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I was under the impression EA were going to release Crysis on consoles, but do a 'Far Cry Instincts' type remake.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 8:31AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Don't even think the game will look like that. A 8800gtx can only run oblivion at about 40fps with the settings on full. And how long has that been out?

It kind of pisses me off how developers release screencaps and videos of games knowing full well hardly anyone is going to be able to play it like that.

Someone needs to tell these guys to make games for technology that people can actually go out and buy when the games is released. Not a year later.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 8:39AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh nooo i don`t think my PC will run this game:
* Intel celeron
* ATI 9250 pci bus
* 512 Memory Ram
* 40 Gib Hard Drive
* Windows XP Home Edition
!Mannn i`m Fry..........
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 8:44AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
# 20 a 8800 gtx cost you $600.00
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 9:19AM PoisonedAl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ Mode7. Yeah, that's a BRILLIANT idea! Force everyone to use the same old graphics whatever machine they have! I mean going into options changing the video settings is SO hard, lets ruin it for those with brand new rigs like me!

Dumbass.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 9:24AM PoisonedAl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh and remember kids, by the time the game comes out, the price of DX10 cards will be slightly less insane.

Crysis will be the game I'll probably install Vista for. (I have a copy, but nothing worked so I reinstalled XP even tho it can only see three of my four gigs of memory :p )
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 9:30AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@17, steve, buddy...

EA's PUBLISHING the game.

Crytec MADE it.

This isn't a shitty in-house EA Wing Commander game we're talking about here. This is quality, German-made FPS. I know I'll be buying it.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 9:34AM sand0789 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Is this game Far Cry with better graphics or the next big thing on PC?
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 9:47AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
GameTrailers is wrong though...

Both of those videos are not of the game Crysis but of IMAGTP's IMAGIN3D architecture and urban planning tool (Interactive Virtual Model), which uses CryENGINE 2. The new video, the Tramway one, is a unfinished WIP demo video which should not had gone public. The finished version of it should be out soon.

Also... according to the president of IMAGTP the demos are in DirectX 9.

http://www.imagtp.com
http://www.imagtp.com/media/euronews.html
http://incrysis.com/crysis/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=253&Itemid=2
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 9:45AM PoisonedAl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nice use of the English language there Mode7. We'll see if that post gets deleted. And yes, I did understand your post and it's as stupid as you are. They have to ensure the game works on older machines, which they do quite well (hell, even Oblivion will run reasonably well, if not very pretty, on rigs that are getting long in the tooth). As long as it'll run on older machines, why hold back on the maximum? All you'd do is date your game faster.

Now turn off your mum's PII and play outside. You bother me.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 9:54AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No, what I am saying, AI, is that the game you will be playing on your brand spanking new rig will not look as good as the screenshots and vids the devs use to promote the game. DO YOU UNDERSTAND???
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 10:04AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So the game wasn't running on a single 8800gtx at e3?
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 10:12AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't have that information, but since the 8800gtx wasn't out at the time I doubt it.

If you look at the video posted above the framerate seems to get quite choppy in places so I doubt the game will be playable on its highest settings using any single card for at least 6 months.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 10:28AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
#33 yes only a single 8800 gtx...
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 10:31AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Do you people think this game will be a Hallo Killer, is there a posibility....?
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 10:35AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That looks like real-time raytracing incorporated into the CryEngine 2.

How in the world did they do that kind of realistic lighting effects and graphics in real time without loss of performance? o.O

This is insane if DirectX 10 hardware can do this, or let alone the CryEngine 2.

But, damn, very soon we can't tell the difference between computer-rendered real-time imagery to the real thing. We're so damn close now.

*sells soul and body for a new DirectX 10 computer systerm* T_T
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 10:38AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
# 29 no it`s is not a Far cry is a brand new German quality game from CRYTEK, like a brand new BMW....
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 4:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, Halo and Crysis are on different systems, so there's really not going to be competition. Still, I 'd like to think that if this came out on 360 it'd own Halo 3.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 10:47AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Two bad the 360 and the PS3 can't even handle the CryEngine 2. LOL The next gen consoles are outdated already. Epic is even working on an Unreal 4 engine and they have already said the 360 and PS3 can't run it. Looks like we have to wait until next "next" gen..lol
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 10:59AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeahh console gamer will have to wait for Xbox720 and Playstation 4 to play this game, around the year 2013..good luck console gamer`s..........
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 1:12PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It looks really good, It's nice to see the quality i get from Vue 6 infinite in a real time render engine. i have a quite serious pc nad i have trouble rendering some of the crazy plant scenes i make in Vue. i can't imagine real time rendering that shadow scene from within the building. even my pc, built for 3d animation and modeling, is at the bare minimum.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 1:43PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think mine can

Intel Pentium 4 3.6Ghz Hyper Threading
Crucial 4GB DDR2 PC4200 533Mhz Dual Channel
nVidia GeForce 7900 GTX 512MB GDDR3 PCI-E
Maxtor 300GB SATA
Maxtor 80GB SATA
LiteOn 16X DVD-ROM
Mad Dog 16X DVD-RW Dual Layer
Microsoft Windows XP Media Center Edition 2005
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 2:29PM Negativecool said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm not sure I understand the whole cynicism issue towards Crysis's graphics. Graphically, hands down, it IS and will be the prettiest thing out there. That is the craziest attention to detail I have ever seen in a game, and the lighting is incredible. Jungles in any game have always looked too "PC game" to me. (All Vietnam shooters, etc. I'm looking at you) With trees and bushes here and there, and under them, green and brown colored ground to give the illusion of more foliage, dirt, and fallen leaves. What I see in Crysis IS the jungle. With the amount of trees and bushes you would expect from a real jungle. Nothing about tries to give the illusion of jungle, it IS a digital jungle rendered in real time!

I also don't understand the people who beat the drum of the almost cliché "who cares about graphics what about the INNOVATION and gameplay!?" It's like these people lay in wake to pounce on anyone astounded by pretty graphics and flash their seemingly intellectually superior view on what makes a game "good".
I mean, how much can you REALLY do for innovation in a FPS? The camera view is the eyes of your character, you run around, you shoot shit, and you save the day. Other than throw in some gimmicks to add to the gameplay, strategy, and mechanic what else is there? Frankly I find the special suit people wear in the game as gimmicky (although cool), while others will sing its praises as something that really adds to gameplay strategy.

In my opinion the graphical detail of Crysis ITSELF is highly innovative. It allows for so much more interactivity, on a level never seen before--at least never done this well. I could see myself walking around the maps for hours oogling over foliage/lighting/other details before ever seeking enemy to kill. (At some point I'd like to see if I would be able to get infinite bullets with a minigun and see if I could chop down the entire jungle, but that’s neither here nor there.)

I am excited right now, because I can’t wait for the day when graphical detail like that seen in Crysis becomes commonplace.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 2:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"that really blows. PC gaming is overrated. i really wish it was coming to 360"

My friend says the same thing, he too has crappy computer. Ever played a computer game on a gaming rig? There is a difference.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 3:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
People claiming that this game won't be playable without the latest $600 video card need to get a grip.

A CRYSIS DEVELOPER said the game runs on High-ish settings with an Athlon 64 3700+, 1GB Ram, and Radeon X1800XT. You can get all this for under $500. And that was about 3 months ago; they are still optimizing the game.

It's just funny how console fanboys who don't know jack about PC's are so quick to join the "waah you need a $5000 computer to play it PC gaming sux" bandwagon.
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 3:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is what i got:
-Intel Quad core
-Pre-order 2 ATI X2800XTX2 Quad Crossfire
-4 Gig Memory Ram DDR2
-Windows Vista Ultimate
-Power Supply 1000 Watts
-500 Gb Hard Drive
!UUUUUUUhhhhhhhhhhhh Baby this little Monster will Smoke................
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 5:14PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
ATI X2800XTX2 Quad Crossfire?
lame ass card tried to copy nvidias gx2 setup(that came out almost 2 years ago) and couldent pull it off til now? shows how far behind ati is, oh and for the Quad-vid card setup i can get better performance with 2 8800 gtx's than you can with 4 x2800xtx2!did i also mention that the x2800xtx2 is not even a dx10 card.wtf $600 for something thats already left in the dust.I have a friend with 2 7950 gx2s and he hates me and my 2 8800 gtxs...>belch
Reply

Posted: Feb 24th 2007 5:48PM docstrange said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's NOT CRYSYS! Like Mocib said in post #30:

THIS IS VIDEO FOOTAGE OF A TECH DEMO FOR THE GRAPHICS ENGINE, NOT IN GAME IMAGERY.

Check your sources, Joystiq, or I'm gonna start calling you IGN2.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Rhythm Heaven Fever review: Crazy into you

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 12:00PM

Remedy not done with Alan Wake

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 10:30AM

Engadget

TUAW

Massively

WoW